An Opposing Process Model of Benevolent Sexism
- 619 Downloads
An Opposing Process Model outlining the pathways through which individual differences in Benevolent Sexism (BS) simultaneously enhance and attenuate support for gender equality of income and employment opportunity is presented. Results from a New Zealand electoral sample (N = 336) indicated that BS predicted Hostile Sexism (HS), and thus indirectly opposition toward gender-related policies (a hierarchy-enhancing effect). For women, BS also directly predicted attitudes toward gender equality in the opposing, supportive direction (a hierarchy-attenuating effect). Analyses of a 9-month longitudinal sample of undergraduate women substantiated these results (Study II; N = 170). In stable societies, the dual opposing effects of BS seem to form a system where hierarchy-enhancing and hierarchy-attenuating processes tend toward homeostasis or equilibrium within the population.
KeywordsAmbivalent sexism Social policy System justification Moderated mediation Homeostatic system Equilibrium
Portions of the data in Study 1 were collected as part of Ryan Perry’s honors thesis. We thank Tiane Lee, Irene Frieze and Nickola Overall for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript.
- Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1–27.Google Scholar
- Labour on Women’s Issues. (2005). Summary of policy proposed by The Labour Party of New Zealand in 2005.Google Scholar
- O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 32, 396–402.Google Scholar
- Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 185–227.Google Scholar
- Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Statistics New Zealand. (2006). 2006 census of populations and dwellings. Wellington: Statistics New Zealand.Google Scholar