Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 61, Issue 9–10, pp 607–620 | Cite as

When Do Men and Women Make Attributions to Gender Discrimination? The Role of Discrimination Source

  • Gretchen B. SechristEmail author
  • Courtney Delmar
Original Article

Abstract

Two experiments examined the effects of discrimination source on men’s and women’s willingness to make attributions to a sexist experimenter or sexist rules. Students (161 male; 171 females) at a US university were exposed to a discriminatory person, discriminatory rule, or no discrimination. “Experiment 1” demonstrated individuals were less likely to make attributions to a sexist person than an unfair rule, and women were especially reluctant to indicate a person was responsible for their discrimination even when a person was the source. “Experiment 2” showed participants were less likely to indicate an experimenter, and even a rule, was sexist when there was a cost to the perpetrator (i.e., advisor would be notified of the perpetrator’s actions) for making such attributions.

Keywords

Discrimination Sexism Prejudice Attributions Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We thank all of the undergraduate research assistants who spent many hours working on this project. In addition, we thank Kimberly Daubman and T. Joel Wade for providing insightful comments on an earlier version of the article.

References

  1. Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mother: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chodorow, N. J. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: the importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. DeSouza, E. R., Pryor, J. B., & Hutz, C. S. (1998). Reactions to sexual harassment charges between North Americans and Brazilians. Sex Roles, 39, 913–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodd, E. H., Giuliano, T. A., Boutell, J. M., & Moran, B. E. (2001). Respected or rejected: Perceptions of women who confront sexist remarks. Sex Roles, 45, 567–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzgerald, L., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (1990). Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jourard, S. (1976). Some lethal aspects of the male sex role. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  15. Kaiser, C., & Miller, C. (2001). Stop complaining!: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kritzier, H. M., Vidmar, N., & Bogart, W. A. (1991). To confront or not to confront: Measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances. Law & Society Review, 25, 877–887.Google Scholar
  17. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  18. Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., Onglatco, M., & Ogutu, M. (1995). Women’s perceptions of social-sexual behavior: A cross-cultural replication. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Olson, J. E., Frieze, I. H., Wall, S., Zdaniuk, B., Ferligoj, A., et al. (2007). Beliefs in equality for women and men as related to economic factors in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States. Sex Roles, 56, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma-consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 405–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Mood as information in making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 524–531.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2004). When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 111–122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Shaffer, M. A., Joplin, J. R. W., Bell, M. P., Lau, T., & Oguz, C. (2000). Gender discrimination and job-related outcomes: A cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 395–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shelton, J. N., & Stewart, R. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Swim, J. K. (1999). Sensitivity to sexism and perceptions of reports about sexist events. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 251–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., DeCoster, J., Van Allen, K. L., & Ottenbreit, A. (2003). Ask, answer, and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 277–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (1998). Prejudice: The target’s perspective. Santa Barbara, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Swim, J. K., Aikin, K., Hall, W., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swim, J. K., Scott, E. D., Sechrist, G. B., Campbell, B., & Stangor, C. (2003). The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 944–959.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Swim, J. K., Becker, J., Lee, E., & Pruitt, E. R. (2009). Sexism reloaded: Worldwide evidence for its endorsement, expression and emergence in multiple contexts. In H. Landrine & N. Russo (Eds.), Bringing diversity to feminist psychology. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, vol. 7 (pp. 233–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity at Buffalo, The State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations