Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 62, Issue 11–12, pp 810–821 | Cite as

Sex Roles in Health Storylines on Prime Time Television: A Content Analysis

  • Heather J. HetherEmail author
  • Sheila T. Murphy
Original Article

Abstract

This study examined the role of character gender in prime time television health portrayals. A content analysis of 1,291 health-related storylines from three spring seasons (2004–2006) of the ten most popular American television programs measured the frequency of male and female characters in prominent roles and how storylines differed with the sex of the ill or injured character. Our analyses revealed a significantly greater number of male characters. Moreover, storylines with a male ill or injured character were more serious in tone, more likely to take place in a medical setting, and had higher educational value. Proportionally, there were some similarities in storylines across the sexes, however, the absolute differences are striking and may have unfortunate effects on viewers.

Keywords

Content analysis Sex roles Health storylines Television Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Grace Huang and Vicki Beck of Hollywood, Health & Society, part of the Norman Lear Center at the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Southern California for their contributions to the Television Monitoring Project.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 121–153). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  6. Basil, M. D. (1996). Identification as a mediator of celebrity effects. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 40, 478–495.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, V., & Pollard, W. E. (2001). How do regular viewers of prime-time entertainment television shows respond to health information in the shows? Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, Atlanta. October.Google Scholar
  8. Bouman, M. (2002). Turtles and peacocks: Collaboration in entertainment education television. Communication Theory, 12, 225–244.Google Scholar
  9. Brodie, M., Foehr, U., Rideout, V., Baer, N., Miller, C., Flournoy, R., et al. (2001). Communicating health information through the entertainment media: a study of the television drama ER lends support to the notion that Americans pick up information while being entertained. Health Affairs, 20, 192–199.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, R. L., Elliott, M. N., Berry, S. H., Kanouse, D. E., & Hunter, S. B. (2003). Entertainment television as health sex educator: the impact of condom efficacy information in an episode of Friends. Pediatrics, 112, 1115–1121.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Feinstein, A. R., & Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543–549.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glik, D., Berkanovic, E., Stone, K., Ibarra, L., Jones, M. C., Rosen, B., et al. (1999). Health education goes Hollywood: Working with prime-time and daytime entertainment television for immunization promotion. Journal of Health Communication, 3, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Greenberg, B. S., Salmon, C. T., Patel, D., Beck, V., & Cole, G. (2004). Evolution of an E-E research agenda. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 191–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Hether, H. J., Huang, G., Beck, V., Murphy, S. T., & Valente, T. (2008). Entertainment-education in a media-saturated environment: Examining the impact of single and multiple exposures to breast cancer storylines on two popular medical dramas. Journal of Health Communication, 13, 808–823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Keller, S. N., & Brown, J. D. (2002). Media interventions to promote responsible sexual behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 67–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kennedy, M. G., O’Leary, A., Beck, V., Pollard, K., & Simpson, P. (2004). Increases in calls to the CDC National STD and AIDS hotline following AIDS-related episodes in a soap opera. The Journal of Communication, 54, 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kincaid, D. L. (2002). Drama, emotion and cultural convergence. Communication Theory, 12, 136–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawrence, S. C., & Bendixen, K. (1992). His and hers: Male and female anatomy in anatomy texts for US medical students, 1890–1989. Social Science & Medicine, 35, 925–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Papa, M. J., Singhal, A., Law, S., Pant, S., Sood, S., Rogers, E. M., et al. (2000). Entertainment-education and social change: an analysis of parasocial interaction, social learning, collective efficacy, and paradoxical communication. The Journal of Communication, 50, 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perrault, W. D., & Leigh, L. E. (1989). Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 135–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Piotrow, P., & de Fossard, E. (2004). Entertainment-education as a public health intervention. In In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 39–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  24. Pollard, W. E., & Beck, V. (2000). Audience analysis research for developing entertainment-education outreach: Soap opera audiences and health information. Paper presented at the American Public Health Association, Boston. November.Google Scholar
  25. Potter, W. J., & Levine-Donnerstein, D. (1999). Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 27, 258–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ratcliff, K. S. (2002). Women and health: Power, technology, inequality, and conflict in a gendered world. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  27. Rogers, E. M., Vaughan, P. W., Swalehe, R. A., Rao, N., Svenkerud, P., & Sood, S. (1999). Effects of an entertainment-education radio soap opera on family planning in Tanzania. Studies in Family Planning, 30, 193–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12, 8–22.Google Scholar
  29. Sharf, B. F., & Freimuth, V. S. (1993). The construction of illness on entertainment television: Coping with cancer on thirtysomething. Health Communication, 5, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharf, B. F., Freimuth, V. S., Greenspon, P., & Plotnick, C. (1996). Confronting cancer on thirtysomething: Audience response to health content on entertainment television. Health Communication, 5, 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (1999). Entertainment-education: A communication strategy for social change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Singhal, A., & Rogers, E. M. (2002). A theoretical agenda for entertainment-education. Communication Theory, 12, 117–135.Google Scholar
  33. Slater, M. (2002). Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. In M. Green, J. Strange & T. Brock (Eds.), Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundations (pp. 157–182). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12, 173–191.Google Scholar
  35. Sood, S. (2002). Audience involvement and entertainment education. Communication Theory, 12, 153–172.Google Scholar
  36. Viera, A. J., & Garrett, J. M. (2005). Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Family Medicine, 37, 360–363.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Whittier, D. K., Kennedy, M. G., St. Lawrence, J. S., Seeley, S., & Beck, V. (2005). Embedding health messages into entertainment television: Effect on gay men’s response to a syphilis outbreak. Journal of Health Communication, 10, 251–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilkin, H. A., Valente, T. W., Murphy, S. T., Cody, M. J., Huang, G. C., Beck, V., et al. (2007). The effects of a telenovela storyline on breast cancer knowledge and behaviors among Hispanic/Latino audiences. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 455–469.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Winsten, J. A., & DeJong, W. (2001). The designated driver campaign. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (3rd ed., pp. 290–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Valente, T. W., Murphy, S. T., Huang, G., Greene, J., Gusek, J., & Beck, V. (2007). Evaluating a minor storyline on ER about teen obesity, hypertension and 5 a day. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 551–566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Annenberg School for CommunicationUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations