Sex Roles

, Volume 61, Issue 3–4, pp 178–191 | Cite as

The Effects of Contact on Sexual Prejudice: A Meta-Analysis

  • Sara J. Smith
  • Amber M. Axelton
  • Donald A. Saucier
Original Article

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to examine the relationship between contact and sexual prejudice. A quantitative synthesis with 83 effect sizes from 41 articles, using mostly samples from the United States, showed a significant negative relationship between contact and sexual prejudice. Among six possible moderators tested (type of sexual prejudice scale used, correlational versus experimental studies, attitudes toward lesbians versus gay men, publication year, quality of study, and where study was conducted), three were shown to significantly moderate the relationship between contact and sexual prejudice. The relationship between contact and sexual prejudice varied as a function of the type of sexual prejudice measure used, the target group toward which the prejudicial attitudes were assessed, and where the study was conducted.

Keywords

Meta-analysis Intergroup contact Gay Lesbian Sexual prejudice 

References

  1. Aboud, F. E. (2003). The formation of in-group favoritism and out-group prejudice in young children: are they distinct attitudes? Developmental Psychology, 39, 48–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, H. E., Wright, L. W., & Lohr, B. A. (1996). Is homophobia associated with homosexual arousal? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 105, 440–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Perseus Books. 1979.Google Scholar
  4. *Anderssen, N. (2002). Does contact with lesbians and gays lead to friendlier attitudes? A two year longitudinal study. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 124–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. *Basow, S. A., & Johnson, K. (2000). Predictors of homophobia in female college students. Sex Roles, 42, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. *Berkman, C. S., & Zinberg, G. (1997). Homophobia and heterosexism in social workers. Social Work, 42, 319–332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. *Bowen, A. M., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward lesbians, gay, and bisexual college students: the contribution of pluralistic ignorance, dynamic social impact, and contact theories. Journal of American College Health, 50, 91–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. *Cotton-Huston, A. L., & Waite, B. M. (2000). Anti-homosexual attitudes in college students: predictors and classroom interventions. Journal of Homosexuality, 38, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *D’Augelli, A. R., & Rose, M. L. (1990). Homophobia in a university community: attitudes and experiences of heterosexual freshman. Journal of College Student Development, 31, 484–491.Google Scholar
  10. Dásgupta, N. (2004). Implicit ingroup favoritism, outgroup favoritism, and their behavioral manifestations. Social Justice Research, 17, 143–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. *Ellis, A. L., & Vasseur, R. B. (1993). Prior interpersonal contact with and attitudes towards gays and lesbians in an interviewing context. Journal of Homosexuality, 25, 31–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. *Estrada, A. X., & Weiss, D. J. (1999). Attitudes of military personnel toward homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 37, 83–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaertner, S. L., Mann, J. A., Dovidio, J. F., Murrell, A. J., & Pomare, M. (1990). How does cooperation reduce intergroup bias? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 692–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. *Gentry, C. S. (1987). Social distance regarding male and female homosexuals. Journal of Social Psychology, 127, 199–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. *Glassner, B., & Owen, C. (1976). Variations in attitudes toward homosexuality. Cornell Journal of Social Relations, 11, 161–176.Google Scholar
  16. *Grack, C., & Richman, C. L. (1996). Reducing general and specific heterosexism through cooperative contact. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 8, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. *Haddock, G., Zanna, M. P., & Esses, V. M. (1993). Assessing the structure of prejudicial attitudes: the case of attitudes toward homosexuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1105–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. *Hansen, G. L. (1982). Measuring the prejudice against homosexuality (homosexism) among college students: a new scale. The Journal of Social Psychology, 117, 233–236.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Herek, G. M. (1984). Beyond “homophobia”: a social psychological perspective on attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Herek, G. M. (1986). On heterosexual masculinity: some physical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. American Behavioral Scientist, 29, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. *Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals' attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: correlates and gender differences. Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477.Google Scholar
  22. Herek, G. M. (1991). Stigma, prejudice, and violence against lesbians and gay men. In J. Gonsiorek & J. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy, (pp. 60–80). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. Herek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in lesbian and gay psychology Vol. 1, (pp. 206-228). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. *Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. The Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274.Google Scholar
  25. *Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, P. J. (1996). “Some of my best friends”: intergroup contact, concealable stigma, and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbians. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 412–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herek, G. M., & Capitanio, J. P. (1997). AIDS stigma and contact with persons with AIDS: the effects of personal and vicarious contact. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. *Herek, G. M., & Glunt, K. E. (1993). Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men: results from a national survey. The Journal of Sex Research, 30, 239–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (1986). Contact is not enough: An intergroup perspective on the contact hypothesis. In M. Hewstone & R. Brown (Eds.), Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. *Hinrichs, D. W., & Rosenberg, P. J. (2002). Attitudes toward gay, lesbian, and bisexual persons among heterosexual liberal arts college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 61–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. *Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M. (2003). Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 48, 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hudson, W. W., & Ricketts, W. A. (1980). A strategy for the measurement of homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality, 5, 357–372.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, B. T. (1993). DSTAT: software for the meta-analytic review of research literature reviews (version 1.11) [computer program]. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  33. Kite, M. E. (1984). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexuals: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Homosexuality, 10, 69–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, D. (1986). Attitudes toward homosexuality: assessment and behavioral consequences. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 7, 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: a meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1998). Do heterosexual women and men differ in their attitudes towards homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men and bisexuals. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. *Lance, L. M. (1987). The effects of interaction with gay persons on attitudes toward homosexuality. Human Relations, 40, 329–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. *Lance, L. M. (1992). Changes in homophobic views as related to interaction with gay persons: a study in the reduction of tensions. International Journal of Group Tensions, 22, 291–299.Google Scholar
  39. *Lance, L. M. (1994). Do reductions in homophobia from heterosexual interactions with gay persons continue? A study of social contact theory of intergroup tensions. International Journal of Group Tensions, 24, 423–434.Google Scholar
  40. *Liang, C. T. H., & Alimo, C. (2005). The impact of white heterosexual students’ interactions on attitudes toward lesbian, gay and bisexual people: a longitudinal study. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Linville, P. W., & Jones, E. E. (1980). Polarized appraisals of out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 689–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. *Millham, J., San Miguel, C. L., & Kellogg, R. A. (1976). Factor analytic conceptualization of attitudes toward male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 2, 3–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. *Mohipp, C., & Morry, M. M. (2004). The relationship of symbolic beliefs and prior contact to heterosexuals’ attitudes toward gay men and lesbian women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 36, 36–44.Google Scholar
  44. *Mohr, J. J., & Rochlen, A. B. (1999). Measuring attitudes regarding bisexuality in lesbian, gay male, and heterosexual populations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Morin, S. F. (1974). Educational programs as a means of changing attitudes toward gay people. Homosexual Counseling Journal, 1, 160–165.Google Scholar
  46. Morin, S. F., & Garfinkle, E. M. (1978). Male homophobia. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 29–42.Google Scholar
  47. National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. (2005). Retrieved November 15, 2005, from http://www.ngltf.org.
  48. Newman, S. B. (1989). The relative importance of gender role attitudes to male and female attitudes toward lesbians. Sex Roles, 21, 451–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. *Pagtolun-An, I. G., & Clair, J. M. (1986). An experimental study of attitudes toward homosexuals. Deviant Behavior, 7, 121–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact: theory, research and new perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Plant, A. E., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 790–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Pleck, J. H., O’Donnell, L., O’Donnell, C., & Snarey, J. (1988). AIDS-phobia, contact with AIDS, and AIDS-related job stress in hospital workers. Journal of Homosexuality, 15, 41–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. *Riggle, E. D. B., Ellis, A. L., & Crawford, A. M. (1996). The impact of “media contact” on attitudes toward gay men. Journal of Homosexuality, 31, 55–69.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Riordan, S., & Ruggiero, J. (1980). Producing equal-status interracial interaction: replication. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 131–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. *Sakalli, N. (2002a). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. *Sakalli, N. (2002b). Pictures of male homosexuals in the heads of Turkish college students: the effects of sex difference and social contact on stereotyping. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 111–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. *Sakalli, N., & Uğurlu, O. (2001). Effects of social contact with homosexuals on heterosexual Turkish university students’ attitudes towards homosexuality. Journal of Homosexuality, 42, 53–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. *Sakalli, N., & Uğurlu, O. (2002). The effects of social contact with a lesbian person on the attitude change toward homosexuality in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 44, 111–119.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saucier, D. A., & Cawman, A. J. (2004). Civil unions in Vermont: political attitudes, religious fundamentalism, and sexual prejudice. Journal of Homosexuality, 48, 1–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. *Scarberry, N. C., Ratcliff, C. D., Lord, C. G., Lanicek, D. L., & Desforges, D. M. (1997). Effects of individuating information on the generalization part of Allport’s contact hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1291–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. *Schope, R. D., & Eliason, M. J. (2000). Thinking versus acting: assessing the relationship between heterosexual attitudes and behaviors toward homosexuals. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 11, 69–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sherif, M. (1956). Experiments in group conflict. Scientific American, 193, 420–429.Google Scholar
  64. Shulte, J. L., & Battle, J. (2004). The relative importance of ethnicity and religion in predicting attitudes towards gays and lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 47, 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. *Simon, A. (1995). Some correlates of individuals’ attitudes toward lesbians. Journal of Homosexuality, 29, 89–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 703–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. *Simoni, J. M. (1996). Pathways to prejudice: predicting students’ heterosexist attitudes with demographics, self-esteem, and contact with lesbians and gay men. Journal of College Student Development, 37, 68–78.Google Scholar
  68. Stark, P. L. (1991). Traditional gender role beliefs and individual outcomes: an exploratory analysis. Sex Roles, 24, 639–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Walderhaugh, A., Wiig, H. T., Pedersen, T. H., Stavseng, A. J., & Holthe-Berg, H. (2000). Ja til homofil biskop [yes to gay bishop]. Blikk, June, 2–4.Google Scholar
  70. *Weis, C. B., & Dain, R. N. (1979). Ego development and sex attitudes in heterosexual and homosexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 8, 341–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. *Whitley, B. E. (1990). The relationship of heterosexuals’ attributions for the causes of homosexuality to attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Whitley, B. E., & Ǽgisdóttir, S. (2000). The gender belief system, authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, and heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Sex Roles, 42, 947–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whitley, B., & Lee, S. E. (2000). The relationship of authoritarianism and related constructs to attitudes toward homosexuality. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 144–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wilkinson, W. W. (2004). Religiosity, authoritarianism, and homophobia: a multidimensional approach. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 14, 55–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yüzgün, A. (1993). Homosexuality and police terror in Turkey. Journal of Homosexuality, 35, 1–21.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara J. Smith
    • 1
  • Amber M. Axelton
    • 1
  • Donald A. Saucier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations