Sex Roles

, Volume 61, Issue 1–2, pp 72–84

Male and Female Victims of Male Bullies: Social Status Differences by Gender and Informant Source

Original Article

Abstract

We examine two sources of variation in victims’ social adjustment: (a) the informant who identifies a child as victim (i.e., peer, self, or both), and (b) victim gender. Peer and self nominations were provided by 508 fourth and fifth graders from the Midwest U.S. Girls were more likely than boys to be victimized, and victims were evenly distributed among informant source. Self-nominated female victims had lower social status and were involved in more antipathies than their peer-nominated counterparts. Among boys, self-and-peer reported victims had the lowest social status. Having friends was associated with positive social adjustment. Implications are discussed for at-risk victim subgroups: girls whose self-reports of victimization are not validated by others, and boys whose victimization is publicly acknowledged.

Keywords

Victimization Social status Gender differences Informant source 

References

  1. Abecassis, M., Hartup, W. W., Haselager, G. J. T., Scholte, R., & van Lieshout, C. F. M. (2002). Mutual antipathies and their significance in middle childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 1543–1556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar
  4. Barudy, J. (1999). Maltrato Infantil. Prevención y Reparación [Child Mistreatment: Prevention and Reparation]. Santiago: Editorial Galdoc.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, C. (2009). Es la agresividad adaptativa? Evidencias de su función social en adolescentes chilenos [Is aggression adaptive? Evidence of its social function among Chilean adolescents]. In C. Berger & C. Lisboa (Eds.), Agresión en contextos educativos: Reportes de la realidad latinoamericana [Aggression within educational contexts: Reports from Latin America]. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Berger, C., Karimpour, R., & Rodkin, P. (2008). Bullies and victims at school: Perspectives and strategies for primary prevention. In T. Miller (Ed.), School violence and primary prevention pp. 287–314. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Bierman, K. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  8. Boulton, M. J. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal relations between children’s playground behavior and social preference, victimization, and bullying. Child Development, 70, 944–954.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bukowski, W., & Sippola, L. (2005). Friendship and development: Putting the most human relationship in its place. In L. Jensen, & R. Larson (Eds.), New horizons in developmental theory and research pp. 91–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Bukowski, W., Sippola, L., & Newcomb, A. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-gender peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carver, P., Yunger, J., & Perry, D. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 94, 95–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. (2000). Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Copotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dijkstra, J., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: Comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1377–1389.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, N. (1999). Sexual bullying: Gender conflict and pupil culture in secondary schools. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1240–1254.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Espelage, D., Holt, M., & Henkel, R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Espelage, D., Mebane, S., & Swearer, S. (2004). Gender differences in bullying: Moving beyond mean level differences. In D. Espelage, & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention pp. 15–35. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Fine, G. A. (1987). With the boys: Little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  27. Garandeau, C., & Cillessen, A. (2006). From indirect to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (1990). Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2006). The role of masculinity in children’s bullying. Sex Roles, 54, 585–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, S., Bellmore, A., & Juvonen, J. (2003). Peer victimization in middle school: When self- and peer views diverge. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587–599.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2002). Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hartup, W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hartup, W. (2003). Toward understanding mutual antipathies in childhood and adolescence. In E. V. E. Hodges, & N. Card (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relationships pp. 90–110. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Hodges, E., Malone, M., & Perry, D. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hodges, E., & Perry, D. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jiang, X. L., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized pp. 105–124. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  40. Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  41. Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14, 74–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. LaFontana, K., & Cillessen, A. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leff, S., Kupersmidt, J., Patterson, C., & Power, T. (1999). Factors influencing teacher identification of peer bullies and victims. School Psychology Review, 28, 505–517.Google Scholar
  44. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. McMaster, L. E., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. M. (2002). Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: A developmental perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 91–105.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newcomb, A., & Bukowski, W. (1984). A longitudinal study of the utility of social preference and social impact sociometric classification schemes. Child Development, 55, 1434–1447.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699–710.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.Google Scholar
  49. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  50. Olweus, D. (2009). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), International Handbook of School Bullying (in press).Google Scholar
  51. Orenstein, P. (1994). SchoolGirls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  52. Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying and victimization in middle school: A dominance relations perspective. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 488–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175–204.Google Scholar
  56. Rodkin, P. C., & Fischer, K. (2003). Sexual harassment and the cultures of childhood: Developmental, domestic violence, and legal perspectives. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 177–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rodkin, P., & Hodges, E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.Google Scholar
  58. Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., Farmer, T. W., & Van Acker, R. (2003). Enemies in the gendered societies of middle childhood: Prevalence, stability, associations with social status, and aggression. In E. V. E. Hodges, & N. Card (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relationships pp. 73–88. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  59. Rose, A., & Rudolph, K. (2006). A review of gender differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schäfer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 323–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer, A., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1116–1127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized pp. 145–174. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  65. Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P. (2008). Everyday victimization of adolescent girls by boys: Sexual harassment, bullying or aggression? Sex Roles, 58, 477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sroufe, A., Bennett, C., Englund, M., Urban, J., & Shulman, S. (1993). The significance of gender boundaries in preadolescence: Contemporary correlates and antecedents of boundary violation and maintenance. Child Development, 64, 455–466.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stein, N. (1995). Sexual harassment in schools: The public performance of gendered violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 145–162.Google Scholar
  69. Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development, 76, 1072–1091.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Underwood, M., Scott, B., Galperin, M., Bjornstad, G., & Genderton, A. (2004). An observational study of social exclusion under varied conditions: Gender and developmental differences. Child Development, 75, 1538–1555.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Unnever, J., & Cornell, D. (2004). Middle school victims of bullying: Who reports being bullied? Aggressive Behavior, 30, 373–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A., De Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B., De Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843–1854.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Young, E., & Raffaele Mendez, L. (2003). The mental health professional’s role in understanding, preventing, and responding to student sexual harassment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yunger, J., Carver, P., & Perry, D. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Alberto HurtadoFacultad de PsicologíaSantiagoChile
  2. 2.Department of Educational PsychologyCollege of Education, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations