Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Male and Female Victims of Male Bullies: Social Status Differences by Gender and Informant Source

Abstract

We examine two sources of variation in victims’ social adjustment: (a) the informant who identifies a child as victim (i.e., peer, self, or both), and (b) victim gender. Peer and self nominations were provided by 508 fourth and fifth graders from the Midwest U.S. Girls were more likely than boys to be victimized, and victims were evenly distributed among informant source. Self-nominated female victims had lower social status and were involved in more antipathies than their peer-nominated counterparts. Among boys, self-and-peer reported victims had the lowest social status. Having friends was associated with positive social adjustment. Implications are discussed for at-risk victim subgroups: girls whose self-reports of victimization are not validated by others, and boys whose victimization is publicly acknowledged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abecassis, M., Hartup, W. W., Haselager, G. J. T., Scholte, R., & van Lieshout, C. F. M. (2002). Mutual antipathies and their significance in middle childhood and early adolescence. Child Development, 73, 1543–1556.

  2. Adler, P., & Adler, P. (1998). Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  3. American Association of University Women Educational Foundation (2001). Hostile hallways: Bullying, teasing, and sexual harassment in school. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.

  4. Barudy, J. (1999). Maltrato Infantil. Prevención y Reparación [Child Mistreatment: Prevention and Reparation]. Santiago: Editorial Galdoc.

  5. Berger, C. (2009). Es la agresividad adaptativa? Evidencias de su función social en adolescentes chilenos [Is aggression adaptive? Evidence of its social function among Chilean adolescents]. In C. Berger & C. Lisboa (Eds.), Agresión en contextos educativos: Reportes de la realidad latinoamericana [Aggression within educational contexts: Reports from Latin America]. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria (in press).

  6. Berger, C., Karimpour, R., & Rodkin, P. (2008). Bullies and victims at school: Perspectives and strategies for primary prevention. In T. Miller (Ed.), School violence and primary prevention pp. 287–314. New York: Springer-Verlag.

  7. Bierman, K. (2004). Peer rejection: Developmental processes and intervention strategies. New York: Guilford.

  8. Boulton, M. J. (1999). Concurrent and longitudinal relations between children’s playground behavior and social preference, victimization, and bullying. Child Development, 70, 944–954.

  9. Bukowski, W., & Sippola, L. (2005). Friendship and development: Putting the most human relationship in its place. In L. Jensen, & R. Larson (Eds.), New horizons in developmental theory and research pp. 91–98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  10. Bukowski, W., Sippola, L., & Newcomb, A. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-gender peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147–154.

  11. Card, N. A., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2007). Victimization within mutually antipathetic peer relationships. Social Development, 16, 479–496.

  12. Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229.

  13. Carver, P., Yunger, J., & Perry, D. (2003). Gender identity and adjustment in middle childhood. Sex Roles, 94, 95–109.

  14. Chang, L. (2004). The role of classroom norms in contextualizing the relations of children’s social behaviors to peer acceptance. Developmental Psychology, 40, 691–702.

  15. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Borch, C. (2006). Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: A growth curve modeling analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 935–959.

  16. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Bukowski, W. (2000). Recent advances in the measurement of acceptance and rejection in the peer system. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  17. Cillessen, A. H. N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: Developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.

  18. Coie, J., Dodge, K., & Copotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental Psychology, 18, 557–570.

  19. Dijkstra, J., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2007). Same-gender and cross-gender peer acceptance and peer rejection and their relation to bullying and helping among preadolescents: Comparing predictions from gender-homophily and goal-framing approaches. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1377–1389.

  20. Duncan, N. (1999). Sexual bullying: Gender conflict and pupil culture in secondary schools. New York: Routledge.

  21. Eder, D., Evans, C. C., & Parker, S. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

  22. Ellis, W., & Zarbatany, L. (2007). Peer group status as a moderator of group influence on children’s deviant, aggressive, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 78, 1240–1254.

  23. Espelage, D., Holt, M., & Henkel, R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220.

  24. Espelage, D., Mebane, S., & Swearer, S. (2004). Gender differences in bullying: Moving beyond mean level differences. In D. Espelage, & S. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention pp. 15–35. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  25. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  26. Fine, G. A. (1987). With the boys: Little league baseball and preadolescent culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  27. Garandeau, C., & Cillessen, A. (2006). From indirect to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 641–654.

  28. Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (1990). Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  29. Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2006). The role of masculinity in children’s bullying. Sex Roles, 54, 585–588.

  30. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., Borghi, F., & Franzoni, L. (2008). The role of bystanders in students' perception of bullying and sense of safety. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 617–638.

  31. Graham, S., Bellmore, A., & Juvonen, J. (2003). Peer victimization in middle school: When self- and peer views diverge. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 117–138.

  32. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (1998). Self-blame and peer victimization in middle school: An attributional analysis. Developmental Psychology, 34, 587–599.

  33. Graham, S., & Juvonen, J. (2002). Ethnicity, peer harassment, and adjustment in middle school: An exploratory study. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 22, 173–199.

  34. Hartup, W. (1996). The company they keep: Friendships and their developmental significance. Child Development, 67, 1–13.

  35. Hartup, W. (2003). Toward understanding mutual antipathies in childhood and adolescence. In E. V. E. Hodges, & N. Card (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relationships pp. 90–110. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  36. Hodges, E., Malone, M., & Perry, D. (1997). Individual risk and social risk as interacting determinants of victimization in the peer group. Developmental Psychology, 33, 1032–1039.

  37. Hodges, E., & Perry, D. (1999). Personal and interpersonal antecedents and consequences of victimization by peers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 677–685.

  38. Jiang, X. L., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2005). Stability of continuous measures of sociometric status: A meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 25, 1–25.

  39. Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized pp. 105–124. New York: Guilford.

  40. Kindlon, D., & Thompson, M. (1999). Raising Cain: Protecting the emotional life of boys. New York: Ballantine.

  41. Ladd, G. W., & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2002). Identifying victims of peer aggression from early to middle childhood: Analysis of cross-informant data for concordance, estimation of relational adjustment, prevalence of victimization, and characteristics of identified victims. Psychological Assessment, 14, 74–96.

  42. LaFontana, K., & Cillessen, A. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multi-method assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635–647.

  43. Leff, S., Kupersmidt, J., Patterson, C., & Power, T. (1999). Factors influencing teacher identification of peer bullies and victims. School Psychology Review, 28, 505–517.

  44. Maccoby, E. E. (1998). The two sexes: Growing up apart, coming together. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  45. McMaster, L. E., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., & Craig, W. M. (2002). Peer to peer sexual harassment in early adolescence: A developmental perspective. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 91–105.

  46. Newcomb, A., & Bukowski, W. (1984). A longitudinal study of the utility of social preference and social impact sociometric classification schemes. Child Development, 55, 1434–1447.

  47. Ojanen, T., Grönroos, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2005). An interpersonal circumplex model of children’s social goals: Links with peer-reported behavior and sociometric status. Developmental Psychology, 41, 699–710.

  48. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere Press.

  49. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Oxford: Blackwell.

  50. Olweus, D. (2009). Understanding and researching bullying: Some critical issues. In S. Jimerson, S. Swearer, & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), International Handbook of School Bullying (in press).

  51. Orenstein, P. (1994). SchoolGirls: Young women, self-esteem, and the confidence gap. New York: Anchor.

  52. Pellegrini, A. D. (2002). Bullying and victimization in middle school: A dominance relations perspective. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163.

  53. Rigby, K., & Johnson, B. (2006). Expressed readiness of Australian schoolchildren to act as bystanders in support of children who are being bullied. Educational Psychology, 26, 425–440.

  54. Rodkin, P. C., & Berger, C. (2008). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetries by victim gender. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32, 488–501.

  55. Rodkin, P. C., Farmer, T. W., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2006). They’re cool: Social status and peer group supports for aggressive boys and girls. Social Development, 15, 175–204.

  56. Rodkin, P. C., & Fischer, K. (2003). Sexual harassment and the cultures of childhood: Developmental, domestic violence, and legal perspectives. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 177–196.

  57. Rodkin, P., & Hodges, E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.

  58. Rodkin, P. C., Pearl, R., Farmer, T. W., & Van Acker, R. (2003). Enemies in the gendered societies of middle childhood: Prevalence, stability, associations with social status, and aggression. In E. V. E. Hodges, & N. Card (Eds.), Enemies and the darker side of peer relationships pp. 73–88. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

  59. Rose, A., & Rudolph, K. (2006). A review of gender differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131.

  60. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviors associated with bullying in schools. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258.

  61. Schäfer, M., Korn, S., Brodbeck, F., Wolke, D., & Schulz, H. (2005). Bullying roles in changing contexts: The stability of victim and bully roles from primary to secondary school. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29, 323–335.

  62. Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., Petermann, F., & Jugert, G. (2006). Physical, verbal, and relational forms of bullying among German students: Age trends, gender differences, and correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 32, 261–275.

  63. Schwartz, D., Hopmeyer, A., Nakamoto, J., & McKay, T. (2006). Popularity, social acceptance, and aggression in adolescent peer groups: Links with academic performance and school attendance. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1116–1127.

  64. Schwartz, D., Proctor, L. J., & Chien, D. H. (2001). The aggressive victim of bullying: Emotional and behavioral dysregulation as a pathway to victimization by peers. In J. Juvonen, & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school: The plight of the vulnerable and victimized pp. 145–174. New York: Guilford.

  65. Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P. (2008). Everyday victimization of adolescent girls by boys: Sexual harassment, bullying or aggression? Sex Roles, 58, 477–489.

  66. Solberg, M. E., & Olweus, D. (2003). Prevalence estimation of school bullying with the Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 239–268.

  67. Sroufe, A., Bennett, C., Englund, M., Urban, J., & Shulman, S. (1993). The significance of gender boundaries in preadolescence: Contemporary correlates and antecedents of boundary violation and maintenance. Child Development, 64, 455–466.

  68. Stein, N. (1995). Sexual harassment in schools: The public performance of gendered violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 145–162.

  69. Troop-Gordon, W., & Ladd, G. (2005). Trajectories of peer victimization and perceptions of the self and schoolmates: Precursors to internalizing and externalizing problems. Child Development, 76, 1072–1091.

  70. Underwood, M., Scott, B., Galperin, M., Bjornstad, G., & Genderton, A. (2004). An observational study of social exclusion under varied conditions: Gender and developmental differences. Child Development, 75, 1538–1555.

  71. Unnever, J., & Cornell, D. (2004). Middle school victims of bullying: Who reports being bullied? Aggressive Behavior, 30, 373–388.

  72. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Oldehinkel, A., De Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2005). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41, 672–682.

  73. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Zijlstra, B., De Winter, A., Verhulst, F., & Ormel, J. (2007). The dyadic nature of bullying and victimization: Testing a dual-perspective theory. Child Development, 78, 1843–1854.

  74. Young, E., & Raffaele Mendez, L. (2003). The mental health professional’s role in understanding, preventing, and responding to student sexual harassment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 7–23.

  75. Yunger, J., Carver, P., & Perry, D. (2004). Does gender identity influence children’s psychological well-being? Developmental Psychology, 40, 572–582.

Download references

Acknowledgment

This research was supported by grants to the second author from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03 HD48491-01) and the Spencer Foundation (Small Grant #20050079). The authors thank the children, teachers, and school principals who participated in and contributed to this project.

Author information

Correspondence to Christian Berger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berger, C., Rodkin, P.C. Male and Female Victims of Male Bullies: Social Status Differences by Gender and Informant Source. Sex Roles 61, 72–84 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9605-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Victimization
  • Social status
  • Gender differences
  • Informant source