Sex Roles

, Volume 60, Issue 3–4, pp 160–173 | Cite as

Sexual Self-Esteem in American and British College Women: Relations with Self-Objectification and Eating Problems

Original Article

Abstract

The present study extended Objectification Theory (Fredrickson and Roberts, Psychol Women Q 21:173–206, 1997) to test the role of sexual self-esteem in models of disordered eating. Measures of self-objectification, sexual well-being, and disordered eating were completed by American (N = 104) and British (N = 111) college women. In Study 1, higher self-objectification was associated with lower sexual self-esteem, which, in turn, mediated the relationship between self-objectification and disordered eating in American women. In Study 2, path analyses indicated that self-objectification led to sexual self-esteem and body shame, which led to disordered eating in British women. This pattern of results was replicated, albeit weaker, when sexual self-competence replaced sexual self-esteem in the model. Discussion considers the significance of self-objectification and sexual self-esteem for women’s well-being.

Keywords

Self-objectification Sexual self-esteem Sexual self-competence Disordered eating 

References

  1. Ackard, D. M., Kearney-Cooke, A., & Peterson, C. B. (2000). Effect of body image and self-image on women’s sexual behaviours. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 422–429.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adkins, E. C., & Keel, P. K. (2005). Does “excessive” or “compulsive” best describe exercise as a symptom of bulmia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 38, 24–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychological Association, Task Force on the Sexualization of Girls, (2007). Report of the APA Task Force on the sexualization of girls. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization_report_summary.pdf
  4. Andersen, B. L., & Cyranowski, J. M. (1994). Women’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1079–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Althof, S. E., Rosen, R. C., Derogatis, L., Corty, E., Quirk, F., & Symonds, T. (2005). Outcome measurement in female sexual dysfunction clinical trials: review and recommendations. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 31, 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartky, S. (1990). Femininity and domination. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. British Medical Association, (2000). Eating disorders, body image, and the media. Retrieved June 10, 2008, from http://www.bma.org.uk/ap.nsf/Content/Eatingdisorders?OpenDocument&Highlight = 2,body,image
  9. Bryman, A., & Cramer, D. (1990). Quantitative data analysis for social scientists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Busby, L., & Leichty, G. (1993). Feminism and advertising in traditional and nontraditional women’s magazines, 1950s–1980s. The Journalism Quarterly, 70, 247–264.Google Scholar
  11. Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calogero, R. M., Boroughs, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2007). The impact of Western beauty ideals on the lives of women and men: A sociocultural perspective. In V. Swami, & A. Furnham (Eds.), Body beautiful: Evolutionary and sociocultural perspectives (pp. 259–298). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Calogero, R. M., Davis, W. N., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). The role of self-objectification in the experience of women with eating disorders. Sex Roles, 52, 43–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cash, T. F. (2002). Women’s body images. In G. M. Wingood, & R. J. DiClemente (Eds.), Handbook of women’s sexual and reproductive health: Issues in women health (pp. 175–194). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Charles, N., & Kerr, M. (1986). Food for feminist thought. The Sociological Review, 34, 537–572 ah, NJ.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Costanzo, P. R. (1992). External socialization and the development of adaptive individuation and social connection. In D. N. Ruble, P. R. Costanzo, & M. E. Oliveri (Eds.), The social psychology of mental health (pp. 55–80). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  19. Dittmar, H. (2005). Vulnerability factors and processes linking sociocultural pressures and body dissatisfaction: introduction to special issue: body image. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 1003–1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dittmar, H., & Howard, S. (2004). Professional hazards?: the impact of models’ body size on advertising effectiveness and women’s body-focused anxiety in professions that do and do not emphasize the cultural ideal of thinness. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 477–497.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dove, N. L., & Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Cognitive distraction and women’s sexual functioning. Sex Roles, 52, 463–475.Google Scholar
  22. Ellison, C. R. (2000). Women’s sexualities: Generations of women share intimate secrets of sexual self-acceptance. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.Google Scholar
  23. Evans, L., & Wertheim, E. H. (1998). Intimacy patterns and relationship satisfaction of women with eating problems and the mediating effects of depression, trait anxiety, and social anxiety. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 44, 355–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fairburn, C. G., Cooper, Z., Doll, H. A., & Welch, S. L. (1999). Risk factors for anorexia nervosa: three integrated case-control comparisons. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 468–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fortenberry, J. D., Sayegh, M. A., & Orr, D. P. (2005). The association of sexual self-concept with oral–genital sex among adolescent women. The Journal of Adolescent Health, 36, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: towards understanding women’s lived experience and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garner, D. M. (1991). EDI-2: Eating disorder inventory professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  29. Garrow, J. S., & Webster, J. (1985). Quetelet’s index (w/h2) as a measure of fatness. International Journal of Obesity, 9, 147–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaynor, P. A., & Underwood, J. K. (1995). Conceptualizing and measuring sexual self-esteem. In S. T. Fiske, & P. E. Shrout (Eds.), Personality research, methods, and theory (pp. 333–347). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  31. Grogan, S. (2006). Body image and health: contemporary perspectives. Journal of Health Psychology, 11, 523–530.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grogan, S., & Wainwright, N. (1996). Growing up in the culture of slenderness: girls’ experiences of body dissatisfaction. Womens Studies International Forum, 19, 665–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harned, M. S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). Understanding a link between sexual harassment and eating disorder symptoms: a mediational analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 1170–1181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harper, B., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The effect of thin ideal images on women’s self-objectification, mood, and body image. Sex Roles, 58, 649–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hendrick, C., & Hendrick, S. (1983). Liking, loving, and relating. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  36. Huebner, D. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1999). Gender differences in memory perspectives: evidence for self-objectification in women. Sex Roles, 41, 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnston-Robledo, I., Wares, S., Fricker, J., & Pasek, L. (2007). Indecent exposure: self-objectification and young women’s attitudes toward breastfeeding. Sex Roles, 56, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kashak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experience. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Katz, J., & Farrow, S. (2000). Discrepant self-views and young women’s sexual and emotional adjustment. Sex Roles, 42, 781–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kozee, H. B., Tylka, T. L., Augustus-Horvath, C. L., & Denchik, A. (2007). Development and psychometric evaluation of the interpersonal sexual objectification scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Krassas, N. R., Blauwkamp, J. M., & Wesselink, P. (2003). “Master your Johnson”: sexual rhetoric in Maxim and stuff magazines. Sexuality & Culture, 7, 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lavie, M., & Willig, C. (2005). “I don’t feel like melting butter”: an interpretative phenomenological analysis of the experience if ‘inorgasmia’. Psychology & Health, 20, 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Linder, K. (2004). Images of women in general interest and fashion advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles, 51, 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test the significance of the mediated effect. Psychological Methods, 7, 83–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Global self-esteem: its relation to specific facets of self-concept and their importance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1224–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayers, K. S., Heller, D. K., & Heller, J. A. (2003). Damaged sexual self-esteem: a kind of disability. Sexuality and Disability, 21, 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McCarthy, M. (1990). The thin ideal, depression and eating disorders in women. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 205–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The objectified body consciousness scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McLaren, L., Kuh, D., Hardy, R., & Gauvin, L. (2004). Positive and negative body-related comments and their relationship with body dissatisfaction in middle-aged women. Psychology & Health, 19, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mercurio, A. E., & Landry, L. J. (2008). Self-objectification and well-being: the impact of self-objectification on women’s overall sense of self-worth and life satisfaction. Sex Roles, 58, 458–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moradi, B., Dirks, D., & Matteson, A. V. (2005). Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: a test and extension of objectification theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2000). The experience of sexual harassment among grade-school students: early socialization of female subordination? Sex Roles, 43, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Offer, D. (1969). The psychological world of the teenager: A study of normal adolescent boys. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  55. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Orbach, S. (1993). Hunger strike: The anorectics struggle as a metaphor for our age. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  57. O’Sullivan, L. F., Meyer-Bahlburg, H. F. L., & McKeague, I. W. (2006). The development of the sexual self-concept inventory for early adolescent girls. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research (3rd ed.). Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  59. Peter, J., & Valkenberg, P. M. (2007). Adolescents’ exposure to a sexualized media environment and their notions of women as sex objects. Sex Roles, 56, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Peterson, R. D., Grippo, K. P., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (2008). Empowerment and powerlessness: a closer look at the relationship between feminism, body image, and eating disturbance. Sex Roles, 58, 639–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pitts, C., & Waller, G. (1993). Self-denigratory beliefs following sexual abuse: association with the symptomatology of bulimic disorders. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 13, 407–410.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P. (2002). Causes of eating disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 187–213.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.Google Scholar
  64. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2007). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved October 24, 2007, from http://www.people.ku.edu/∼preacher/sobel/sobel.htm
  65. Raciti, M., & Hendrick, S. S. (1992). Relationships between eating disorder characteristics and love and sex attitudes. Sex Roles, 27, 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reichert, T., & Carpernter, C. (2004). An update on sex in magazine advertising: 1983 to 2003. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 81, 823–837.Google Scholar
  67. Roberts, T. A. (2004). Female trouble: the menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 22–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rodriguez, S., Mata, J. L., Lameiras, M., Fernandez, M. C., & Vila, J. (2007). Dyscontrol evoked by erotic and food images in women with bulimia nervosa. European Eating Disorders Review, 15, 231–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenberg, M. (1986). Conceiving the self. Malabar, FL: Krieger.Google Scholar
  70. Rosenthal, D., Moore, S., & Flynn, I. (1991). Adolescent self-efficacy, self-esteem and sexual risk-taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 1, 77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sanchez, D. T., & Kiefer, A. K. (2007). When the relationship becomes her: revisiting women’s body consciousness from a relationship contingency perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schoemaker, C., van Strien, T., & van der Staak, C. (1994). Validation of the eating disorder inventory in a nonclinical population using transformed and untransformed scores. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 15, 387–393.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Seal, A., Minichiello, V., & Omodei, M. (1997). Young women’s sexual risk taking behaviour: re-visiting the influences of sexual self-efficacy and sexual self-esteem. International Journal of STD & AIDS, 8, 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Shulman, J. L., & Horne, S. G. (2003). The use of self-pleasure: masturbation and body image among African American and European American women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 262–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 26, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Snell, W. E., & Papini, D. R. (1989). The sexuality scale: an instrument to measure sexual self-esteem, sexual depression, and sexual preoccupation. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 256–263.Google Scholar
  77. Steer, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2008). The role of self-objectification in women’s sexual functioning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Smolak, L. (2001). Eating disorders: Innovative directions in research and practice. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. The Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tangney, J. P., Miller, R. S., Flicker, L., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Are shame, guilt, and embarrassment distinct emotions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1256–1269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thompson, J. K., Heinberg, L. J., Altabe, M. N., & Tantleff-Dunn, S. (1999). Exacting beauty: Theory, assessment and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tiefer, L. (2001). A new view of women’s sexual problems: why new? Why now? Journal of Sex Research, 38, 89–96.Google Scholar
  83. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: the role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Troop, N. A. (1998). Eating disorders as coping strategies: a critique. European Eating Disorders Review, 6, 229–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tylka, T. L., & Hill, M. S. (2004). Objectification theory as it relates to disordered eating among college women. Sex Roles, 51, 719–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Ussher, J. (1989). The psychology of the female body. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  89. Ward, L. M., & Friedman, K. (2006). Using TV as a guide: associations between television viewing and adolescents’ sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 16, 133–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ward, L. M., Merriwether, A., & Caruthers, A. (2006). Breasts are for men: media, masculinity ideologies, and men’s beliefs about women’s bodies. Sex Roles, 55, 703–714.Google Scholar
  91. Weaver, A. D., & Byers, S. (2006). The relationships among body image, body mass index, exercise, and sexual functioning in heterosexual women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 333–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Welch, G., Hall, A., & Walkey, F. (1988). The factor structure of the eating disorders inventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 51–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wiederman, M. W. (1996). Women, sex, and food: a review of research on eating disorders and sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 301–311.Google Scholar
  94. Wiederman, M. W. (2000). Women’s body image self-consciousness during physical intimacy with a partner. Journal of Sex Research, 37, 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wiederman, M. W. (2002). Body image and sexual functioning. In T. F. Cash, & T. Pruzinsky (Eds.), Body image: A handbook of theory, research, and clinical practice (pp. 287–294). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  96. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1993). The measurement of sexual esteem: investigation of Snell and Papini’s (1989) sexuality scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wiederman, M. W., Pryor, T., & Morgan, C. D. (1996). The sexual experience of women diagnosed with anorexia nervosa or bulimia nervosa. The International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19, 109–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Yamamiya, Y., Cash, T. F., & Thompson, J. K. (2006). Sexual experiences among college women: the differential effects of general versus contextual body images on sexuality. Sex Roles, 55, 421–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Zeanah, P. D., & Schwarz, J. C. (1996). Reliability and validity of the sexual self-esteem inventory for women. Assessment, 3, 1–15.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Keynes CollegeUniversity of KentCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, PCD 4118University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations