Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 5–6, pp 392–403 | Cite as

“Ain’t I a Woman?”: Towards an Intersectional Approach to Person Perception and Group-based Harms

  • Phillip Atiba Goff
  • Margaret A. Thomas
  • Matthew Christian Jackson
Original Article

Abstract

Our research examines whether intersecting racial and gender identities affect person perception. Predominantly White undergraduates (292) from a large northeastern U.S. university categorized and rated pictures (Study 1) and videos (Study 2) of Black and White men and women. We supported three hypotheses: 1) intersectionality affects person perception processes, leading to gender categorization errors for Black women; 2) “Blackness” and “maleness” are highly associated for Black male and female targets; and, 3) women are perceived as unattractive proportionally to their perceived masculinity, leading Black women to be rated as less attractive than other women. We suggest that intersectional approaches are required in order to fully understand person perception. Further, the Black/male association may lead to unique harms for Black women.

Keywords

Race Gender Intersectionality Person perception 

References

  1. Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice: A comprehensive and penetrating study of the origin and nature of prejudice. Garden City, NY: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Postman, L. (1947). The psychology of rumor. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  3. Ambadi, N., Bernieri, F. J., & Richeson, J. A. (2000). Toward a histology of social behavior: Judgement accuracy from thin slices of the behavioral stream. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 32, (pp. 201–271)). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  4. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1992). Thin slices of expressive behavior as predictors of interpersonal consequences: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In R. Wyer, & T. Srull (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (vol. Vol. 1, (pp. 1–36)). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  6. Brunswik, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments. Berkeley, CA: University of California.Google Scholar
  7. Byrd, A. D., & Tharps, L. L. (2002). Hair story: Untangling the roots of Black hair in America. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  8. Crenshaw, K. L. (1993). Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990). What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 61–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Devine, P. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devine, P. G., & Elliot, A. J. (1995). Are racial stereotypes really fading? The Princeton trilogy revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1139–1150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eberhardt, J. L., Dasgupta, N., & Banaszynski, T. (2003). Believing is seeing: the effects of racial labels and implicit beliefs on face perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 360–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Estes, S. (2005). I am a man!: Race, manhood, and the Civil Rights Movement. Durham, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
  14. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 23, (pp. 1–74)). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  16. Gilbert, D. E. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. E. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology (vol. 2, pp. 89–150, 4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Goff, P. A., Eberhardt, J. L., Williams, M. J., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). Not yet human: implicit knowledge, historical dehumanization, and contemporary consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 292–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M., & Davies, P. G. (2008). The space between us: stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 91–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golby, A. J., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Chiao, J., & Eberhardt, J. L. (2001). Differential responses in the fusiform region to same-race and other-race faces. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 845–850.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Groom, C., Sherman, J. W., Lu, L., Conrey, F. R., & Keijzer, B. S. C. (2005). Judging compound social categories: compound familiarity and compatibility as determinants of processing mode. Social Cognition, 23, 291–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman: Black women and feminism. New York: South End.Google Scholar
  22. Hull, G. T., Bell Scott, P., & Smith, B. (1982). But some of us are brave: All the women are White, all the Blacks are men: Black women’s studies. New York: Feminist.Google Scholar
  23. Hunter, M. L. (2005). Race, gender, and the politics of skin tone. New York: Rutledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hurston, Z. N. (1937). Their eyes were watching God. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  25. Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003). Race and gender on the brain: electrocortical measures of attention to the race and gender of multiply categorizable individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 616–626.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28, 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001). Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98, 15387–15392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loury, G. C. (2002). The anatomy of racial inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Minear, M., & Park, D. C. (2004). A lifespan database of adult facial stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 630–633.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., Funayama, E. S., Gatenby, J. C., Gore, J. C., et al. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 729–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Stanton, E. C., Anthony, S. B., & Gage, M. J. (Eds.) (1881). History of Woman Suffrage. New York: Fowler & Wells.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, M. A., & Vescio, T. K. (2008). Interpersonal intrigue: Optimally distinct others In press.Google Scholar
  34. White, D. G. (1985). Ar’n’t I a woman: Female slaves in the plantation South. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  35. Weitz, R., & Gordon, L. (1993). Images of Black women among Anglo college students. Sex Roles, 28, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Phillip Atiba Goff
    • 1
    • 3
  • Margaret A. Thomas
    • 2
  • Matthew Christian Jackson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.The Pennsylvania State UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations