Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 5–6, pp 301–311 | Cite as

Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective

Original Article

Abstract

Intersectionality, the mutually constitutive relations among social identities, is a central tenet of feminist thinking and has transformed how gender is conceptualized in research. In this special issue, we focus on the intersectionality perspective in empirical research on gender. Our goal is to offer a “best practices” resource that provides models for when and how intersectionality can inform theory and be incorporated into empirical research on psychological questions at individual, interpersonal, and social structural levels. I briefly summarize the development of the intersectionality perspective, and then review how the realization of its promise has been diverted by preoccupation with intersectionality as a methodological challenge. I conclude with a discussion of why intersectionality is an urgent issue for researchers invested in promoting positive social change.

Keywords

Feminist psychology Social identity Intersectionality theory Hybridity Feminist theory 

References

  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualising feminism: gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bacchi, C. L. (1990). Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  6. Barker, D. K. (2005). Beyond women and economics: rereading “Women’s Work.”. Signs, 30, 2189–2209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhatia, S. (2007). American karma. NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275–289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black Lesbian Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  10. Burman, E. (2005). Engendering culture in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 15, 527–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.) (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  13. Cole, E. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Crenshaw, K. W. (1994/2005). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman, & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Diamond L. & Butterworth, M. (2008). Questioning gender and sexual identity: Dynamic links over time. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  18. Dill, B. T. (1983). Race, class and gender: prospects for an inclusive sisterhood. Feminist Studies, 9, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dottolo, A. L. & Stewart, A. L. (2008). “Don’t ever forget now, you’re a Black man in America”: Intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  20. Eagly, A. H. (1998). On comparing women and men. In D. L. Anselmi, & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender. NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  21. Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  23. Greenwood, R. M., & Christian, A. (2008). What happens when we unpack the invisible knapsack? Intersectional political consciousness and inter-group appraisals. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  24. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. The American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it. The American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., Smith, B. (Eds.) (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: black women’s studies. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist.Google Scholar
  27. Hurtado, A. & Sinha, M. (2008). More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  28. Kennedy, H. (2005). Subjective intersections in the face of the machine: gender, race, class and PCs in the home. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Knapp, G. (2005). Race, class, gender: reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mahalingam, R. (2006). Cultural psychology of immigrants: An introduction. In R. Mahalingam (Ed.), Cultural psychology of immigrants (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Mahalingam, R., Balan, S., & Haritatos, J. (2008). Engendering immigrant psychology: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  33. Marchel, C., & Owens, S. (2007). Qualitative research in psychology: could William James get a job? History of Psychology, 10, 301–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattis J., Grayman, N., Cowie, S., Winston, C., Watson, C., & Jackson, D. (2008). Intersectional identities and the politics of altruistic care in a low-income, urban community. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  35. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone.Google Scholar
  37. Morawski, J. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  38. Mullings, L. (1997). On our own terms: race, class, and gender in the lives of African American women. NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Mullings, L., & Schulz, A. J. (2006). Intersectionality and health. In A. J. Schulz (Ed.), Gender, race, class, and health: intersectional approaches (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Feree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The ideological sources and social consequences of the non-prototypicality of intersectional subordinates. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  42. Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Reid, P. T. (2000). Multicultural psychology: bringing together gender and ethnicity. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: a historically grounded sketch. Theory & Psychology, 12, 7–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Riger, S. (2000). Transforming psychology: gender in theory and practice. NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shields, S. A. (1998). Illusions of progress and “insurgent science.”. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: gender and the social meaning of emotion. NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shields, S. A., & Bhatia, S. (in press). Darwin on race, gender, and culture. American Psychologist.Google Scholar
  51. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  53. Stewart, A. J., & Dottolo, A. L. (2006). Feminist psychology. Signs, 31, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stoppard, J. M., & McMullen, L. M. (Eds.) (2003). Situating sadness: women and depression in social context. NY: NYU.Google Scholar
  55. Townsend, T. G. (2008). Protecting our daughters: Intersection of race, class and gender in African American mothers’ socialization of their daughters’ heterosexuality. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  56. Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: no wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker, A. (2003). Methods, theory and the practice of feminist research: a response to Janet Chafetz. Journal of Family Studies, 25, 990–994.Google Scholar
  58. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, this issue.Google Scholar
  59. Weber, L. (2004). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & M. L. Yaiser (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 121–139). NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Weisstein, N. (1968). Psychology constructs the female. Retrieved January, 2008, from http://www.cwluherstory.org/psychology-constructs-the-female.html.
  61. Weisstein, N. (1993). Power, resistance, and science: a call for a revitalized feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 239–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, A. M. (2008). Ain’t I a feminist?: African American men speak out on fatherhood, friendship, forgiveness, and freedom. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations