Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective

Abstract

Intersectionality, the mutually constitutive relations among social identities, is a central tenet of feminist thinking and has transformed how gender is conceptualized in research. In this special issue, we focus on the intersectionality perspective in empirical research on gender. Our goal is to offer a “best practices” resource that provides models for when and how intersectionality can inform theory and be incorporated into empirical research on psychological questions at individual, interpersonal, and social structural levels. I briefly summarize the development of the intersectionality perspective, and then review how the realization of its promise has been diverted by preoccupation with intersectionality as a methodological challenge. I conclude with a discussion of why intersectionality is an urgent issue for researchers invested in promoting positive social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acker, J. (2006). Inequality regimes: gender, class, and race in organizations. Gender & Society, 20, 441–464.

  2. Anthias, F., & Yuval-Davis, N. (1983). Contextualising feminism: gender, ethnic and class divisions. Feminist Review, 15, 62–75.

  3. Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 80–114.

  4. Baca Zinn, M., & Thornton Dill, B. (1996). Theorizing difference from multiracial feminism. Feminist Studies, 22, 321–331.

  5. Bacchi, C. L. (1990). Same difference: Feminism and sexual difference. Boston, MA: Allen & Unwin.

  6. Barker, D. K. (2005). Beyond women and economics: rereading “Women’s Work.”. Signs, 30, 2189–2209.

  7. Bhatia, S. (2007). American karma. NY: New York University Press.

  8. Bograd, M. (1999). Strengthening domestic violence theories: intersections of race, class, sexual orientation, and gender. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 25, 275–289.

  9. Bowleg, L. (2008). When Black Lesbian Woman ≠ Black Lesbian Woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research. Sex Roles, this issue.

  10. Burman, E. (2005). Engendering culture in psychology. Theory & Psychology, 15, 527–548.

  11. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble. NY: Routledge.

  12. Camic, P. M., Rhodes, J. E., & Yardley, L. (Eds.) (2003). Qualitative research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. Washington, D. C.: American Psychological Association.

  13. Cole, E. (2008). Coalitions as a model for intersectionality: From practice to theory. Sex Roles, this issue.

  14. Collins, P. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

  15. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.

  16. Crenshaw, K. W. (1994/2005). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In M. A. Fineman, & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.), The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–118). New York: Routledge.

  17. Diamond L. & Butterworth, M. (2008). Questioning gender and sexual identity: Dynamic links over time. Sex Roles, this issue.

  18. Dill, B. T. (1983). Race, class and gender: prospects for an inclusive sisterhood. Feminist Studies, 9, 131–150.

  19. Dottolo, A. L. & Stewart, A. L. (2008). “Don’t ever forget now, you’re a Black man in America”: Intersections of race, class and gender in encounters with the police. Sex Roles, this issue.

  20. Eagly, A. H. (1998). On comparing women and men. In D. L. Anselmi, & A. L. Law (Eds.), Questions of gender. NY: McGraw Hill.

  21. Gamson, J., & Moon, D. (2004). The sociology of sexualities: queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 47–64.

  22. Goff, P. A., Thomas, M. A., & Jackson, M. C. (2008). “Ain’t I a woman?”: Towards an intersectional approach to person perception and group-based harms. Sex Roles, this issue.

  23. Greenwood, R. M., & Christian, A. (2008). What happens when we unpack the invisible knapsack? Intersectional political consciousness and inter-group appraisals. Sex Roles, this issue.

  24. Hare-Mustin, R. T., & Marecek, J. (1988). The meaning of difference: Gender theory, postmodernism, and psychology. The American Psychologist, 43, 455–464.

  25. Helms, J. E., Jernigan, M., & Mascher, J. (2005). The meaning of race in psychology and how to change it. The American Psychologist, 60, 27–36.

  26. Hull, G. T., Scott, P. B., Smith, B. (Eds.) (1982). All the women are white, all the blacks are men, but some of us are brave: black women’s studies. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist.

  27. Hurtado, A. & Sinha, M. (2008). More than men: Latino feminist masculinities and intersectionality. Sex Roles, this issue.

  28. Kennedy, H. (2005). Subjective intersections in the face of the machine: gender, race, class and PCs in the home. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 471–487.

  29. Knapp, G. (2005). Race, class, gender: reclaiming baggage in fast travelling theories. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12, 249–265.

  30. Lorber, J. (1994). Paradoxes of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  31. Mahalingam, R. (2006). Cultural psychology of immigrants: An introduction. In R. Mahalingam (Ed.), Cultural psychology of immigrants (pp. 1–14). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

  32. Mahalingam, R., Balan, S., & Haritatos, J. (2008). Engendering immigrant psychology: An intersectionality perspective. Sex Roles, this issue.

  33. Marchel, C., & Owens, S. (2007). Qualitative research in psychology: could William James get a job? History of Psychology, 10, 301–324.

  34. Mattis J., Grayman, N., Cowie, S., Winston, C., Watson, C., & Jackson, D. (2008). Intersectional identities and the politics of altruistic care in a low-income, urban community. Sex Roles, this issue.

  35. McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30, 1771–1800.

  36. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. Watertown, MA: Persephone.

  37. Morawski, J. (1994). Practicing feminisms, reconstructing psychology: notes on a liminal science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

  38. Mullings, L. (1997). On our own terms: race, class, and gender in the lives of African American women. NY: Routledge.

  39. Mullings, L., & Schulz, A. J. (2006). Intersectionality and health. In A. J. Schulz (Ed.), Gender, race, class, and health: intersectional approaches (pp. 3–17). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

  40. Nakano Glenn, E. (1999). The social construction and institutionalization of gender and race: An integrative framework. In M. M. Feree, J. Lorber, & B. B. Hess (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 3–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  41. Purdie-Vaughns, V. & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The ideological sources and social consequences of the non-prototypicality of intersectional subordinates. Sex Roles, this issue.

  42. Reid, P. T. (1993). Poor women in psychological research: shut up and shut out. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 17, 133–150.

  43. Reid, P. T. (2000). Multicultural psychology: bringing together gender and ethnicity. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8, 103–114.

  44. Richards, G. (2002). The psychology of psychology: a historically grounded sketch. Theory & Psychology, 12, 7–36.

  45. Riger, S. (2000). Transforming psychology: gender in theory and practice. NY: Oxford University Press.

  46. Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: theory wrestling with activism. Gender & Society, 18, 429–450.

  47. Settles, I. H. (2006). Use of an intersectional framework to understand Black women’s racial and gender identities. Sex Roles, 54, 589–601.

  48. Shields, S. A. (1998). Illusions of progress and “insurgent science.”. Feminism & Psychology, 8, 99–104.

  49. Shields, S. A. (2002). Speaking from the heart: gender and the social meaning of emotion. NY: Cambridge University Press.

  50. Shields, S. A., & Bhatia, S. (in press). Darwin on race, gender, and culture. American Psychologist.

  51. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  52. Spelman, E. (1988). Inessential woman. Boston: Beacon.

  53. Stewart, A. J., & Dottolo, A. L. (2006). Feminist psychology. Signs, 31, 493–509.

  54. Stoppard, J. M., & McMullen, L. M. (Eds.) (2003). Situating sadness: women and depression in social context. NY: NYU.

  55. Townsend, T. G. (2008). Protecting our daughters: Intersection of race, class and gender in African American mothers’ socialization of their daughters’ heterosexuality. Sex Roles, this issue.

  56. Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: no wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationship between methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Women Quarterly, 8, 9–32.

  57. Walker, A. (2003). Methods, theory and the practice of feminist research: a response to Janet Chafetz. Journal of Family Studies, 25, 990–994.

  58. Warner, L. R. (2008). A best practices guide to intersectional approaches in psychological research. Sex Roles, this issue.

  59. Weber, L. (2004). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender, and sexuality. In S. N. Hesse-Biber, & M. L. Yaiser (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on social research (pp. 121–139). NY: Oxford University Press.

  60. Weisstein, N. (1968). Psychology constructs the female. Retrieved January, 2008, from http://www.cwluherstory.org/psychology-constructs-the-female.html.

  61. Weisstein, N. (1993). Power, resistance, and science: a call for a revitalized feminist psychology. Feminism & Psychology, 3, 239–245.

  62. White, A. M. (2008). Ain’t I a feminist?: African American men speak out on fatherhood, friendship, forgiveness, and freedom. Albany, NY: SUNY.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to Sex Roles editor, Irene Frieze, for her enthusiasm and support for this special issue. I thank Matthew Zawadzki and Leah Warner for their insightful comments on a draft of this introduction.

Author information

Correspondence to Stephanie A. Shields.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shields, S.A. Gender: An Intersectionality Perspective. Sex Roles 59, 301–311 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9501-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Feminist psychology
  • Social identity
  • Intersectionality theory
  • Hybridity
  • Feminist theory