Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 7–8, pp 476–481 | Cite as

The Evolution of Gendered Political Behavior: Contributions from Feminist Evolutionists

Original Article


This commentary discusses Rebecca Hannagan’s article “Gendered Political Behavior: A Darwinian Feminist Approach,” an interdisciplinary examination of how human female social and political behaviors are unique and have impacted the evolution of human societies. She reexamines the anthropological literature on egalitarian foraging societies to focus on female autonomy and leadership, and connects women’s evolved skills with their contemporary leadership experiences. As Hannagan’s work demonstrates, Darwinian feminists challenge sexist stereotypes from a variety of sub-disciplines that use evolutionary perspectives, build upon and expand the earlier ground-breaking work of other feminist evolutionists, and blaze new trails using the latest technology and models to gain further understanding of human behavior that will help promote greater equality and opportunities for women.


Darwinian feminism Feminist evolutionists Gendered political behavior Autonomy Leadership 


  1. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in drosophila. Heredity, 2, 349–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleir, R. (1984). Science and gender: A critique of biology and its theories on women. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  3. Borgerhoff Mulder, B., et al. (1997). The place of behavioral ecological anthropology in evolutionary social science. In P. Weingart, et al. (Ed.), Human by nature: Between biology and the social sciences. Muhwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  4. Burbank, V. (1994). Cross-cultural perspectives on aggression in women and girls: An introduction. Sex Roles, 30, 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buss, D. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies for human mating. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Buss, D. (1996). Evolutionary insights into feminism and the ‘battle of the sexes’. In D. Buss, & N. Malamuth (Eds.), Sex, power, conflict: Evolutionary and feminist perspectives (p. 296–318). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1985). The myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Gowaty, P. A. (1992). Evolutionary biology and feminism. Human Nature, 3, 217–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gowaty, P. A. (1997a). Introduction: Darwinian feminists and feminist evolutionists. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers, p. 1–17. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  11. Gowaty, P. A. (1997b). Sexual dialectics, sexual selection, and variation in mating behaviors. In P. A. Gowaty (Ed.), Feminism and evolutionary biology: Boundaries, intersections, and frontiers (p. 351–384). New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Gowaty, P. A., & Hubbell, S. P. (2005). Chance, time allocation, and the evolution of adaptively flexible sex role behavior. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 45, 931–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hrdy, S. B. (1981). The woman who never evolved. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist approaches to science (p. 119–146). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  15. Hrdy, S. B. (1997). Raising Darwin’s consciousness: Female sexuality and the prehominid origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 8, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  17. Hubbard, R. (1990). The politics of women’s biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers U. Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, and how. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  19. Larimer, C., Hannagan, R., & Smith, K. (2007). Balancing ambition and gender among decision makers. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 614, 56–73.Google Scholar
  20. Lawless, J., & Fox, R. (2005). It takes a candidate: Why women don’t run for office. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Liesen, L. (1995). Feminism and the politics of reproductive strategies. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 145–162.Google Scholar
  22. Liesen, L. (1998). The legacy of woman the gatherer: The emergence of evolutionary feminism. Evolutionary Anthropology, 6, 105–113.Google Scholar
  23. Liesen, L. (2007). Women, behavior, and evolution: understanding the debate between feminist evolutions and evolutionary psychologists. Politics and the Life Sciences, 26, 51–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Low, B. (2000). Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Pinker, S. (2003). The blank slate: Modern denial of human nature. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rhoads, S. E. (2004). Taking sex differences seriously. San Francisco: Encounter Books.Google Scholar
  27. Slocum, S. (1975). Woman the gatherer: Male bias in anthropology. In R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  28. Smuts, B. (1985). Sex and friendship in baboons. New York: Aldine.Google Scholar
  29. Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 6, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Snyder, B., & Gowaty, P. A. (2007). A reappraisal of Bateman’s classic study of intrasexual selection. Evolution, 61, 2457–2468.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stamps, J. (1995). Sociobiology: Its evolution and intellectual descendants. Politics and the Life Sciences, 14, 191–193.Google Scholar
  32. Tanner, N., & Zihlman, A. (1976). Women in evolution, part I: Innovation and selection in human origins. Signs, 1, 585–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Washburn, S., & Lancaster, S. (1968). The evolution of hunting. In R. Lee, & I. DeVore (Eds.), Man the hunter. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wright, R. (1994). Feminists, meet Mr. Darwin. New Republic, 28 November, 34–46.Google Scholar
  36. Zihlman, A. (1978). Women and evolution, part II: Subsistence and social organization among early hominids. Signs, 4, 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceLewis UniversityRomeovilleUSA

Personalised recommendations