Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 7–8, pp 545–554 | Cite as

The Romance of Self-objectification: Does Priming Romantic Relationships Induce States of Self-objectification Among Women?

Original Article

Abstract

Objectification theory suggests that women internalize an observer’s perspective on the body (self objectification; Fredrickson and Roberts, Psychol Women Q 22:173–206, 1997); however, certain contexts and thoughts may make self-objectification more likely. Because the pursuit of relationships is tied to attractiveness, the present study examines whether women have an automatic link between self-objectification and romantic relationships. Using a US undergraduate sample, women (N = 86) of different relationship statuses were either exposed to relationship-related or neutral words in a lexical decision making task. Following relationship priming, single women showed greater self-objectification and women in relationships showed less self-objectification. These findings are discussed in terms of self-objectification theory and the importance of attractiveness and beauty in the pursuit of relationships.

Keywords

Women Objectification Priming Romantic relationships Body image 

References

  1. Aubrey, J. S. (2006). Effects of sexually objectifying media on self-objectification and body surveillance in undergraduates: Results of a 2-year panel study. Journal of Communication, 56, 366–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (2000). The mind in the middle: A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In H. T. Reiss, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 253–285). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In S. L. Bartky (Ed.), Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of oppression (pp. 63–83). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bartky, S. L. (2003). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women’s bodies (pp. 25–45). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blakemore, J. E. O., Lawton, C. A., & Vartanian, L. R. (2005). I can’t wait to get married: Gender differences in drive to marry. Sex Roles, 53, 327–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate selection: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash, T. F. (1995). Developmental teasing about physical appearance: Retrospective descriptions and relationships with body image. Social Behavior and Personality, 23, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
  10. Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downs, D., James, S., & Cowan, G. (2006). Body objectification, self-esteem, and relationship satisfaction: A comparison of exotic dancers and college women. Sex Roles, 54, 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T. A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frith, H., & Gleeson, K. (2004). Clothing and embodiment: Men managing body image and appearance. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gaesser, G. (1996). Big fat lies: The truth about your weight and your health. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  17. Galacian, M. L. (2004). Sex, love, and romance in the mass media: Analysis and criticism of unrealistic portrayals and their influence. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. Halpern, C. T., King, R. B., Oslak, S. G., & Udry, J. R. (2005). Body mass index, dieting, romance, and sexual activity in adolescent girls: Relationships over time. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15, 535–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrell, Z. A. T., Fredrickson, B. L., Pomerleau, C. S., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2006). The role of trait self-objectification in smoking among college women. Sex Roles, 54, 735–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holland, D. C. (1993). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, S. (2007). Promoting easy sex without genuine intimacy: Maxim and Cosmopolitan cover lines and cover images. In M. Galician, & D. L. Merskin (Eds.), Critical thinking about sex, love, and romance in the mass media (pp. 55–74). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Jones, D. C., Vigfusdottir, T. H., & Lee, Y. (2004). Body image and the appearance culture among adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19, 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lamb, C. S., Jackson, L. A., Cassidy, P. B., & Priest, D. J. (1993). Body figure preferences of men and women: A comparison of two generations. Sex Roles, 28, 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Long, B. H. (1988). Heterosexual involvement of unmarried under-graduate females in relation to self-evaluations. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 18, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Meyer, D. E., & Schevaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Park, L. E. (2007). Appearance-based rejection sensitivity: Implications for mental and physical health, affect, and motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 490–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peirce, K. (1990). A feminist theoretical perspective on the socialization of teenage girls through Seventeen magazine. Sex Roles, 23, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Regan, P. C., & Berscheid, E. (1995). Gender differences in beliefs about the causes of male and female desire. Personal Relationships, 2, 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, T. A., & Gettman, J. Y. (2004). Mere exposure: Gender differences in the negative effects of priming a state of self-objectification. Sex Roles, 51, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rudman, L. A., & Heppen, J. B. (2003). Implicit romantic fantasies and women’s interest in personal power: A glass slipper effect? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1357–1370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sanchez, D. T., & Kiefer, A. K. (2007). Body concerns in and out of the bedroom: Implications for sexual pleasure and problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 808–820.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sanchez, D. T., & Kwang, T. (2007). When relationships become her: Revisiting body concerns from a relationship contingency perspective. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanchez, D. T., Kiefer, A. K., & Ybarra, O. (2006). Sexual submissiveness in women: Costs for autonomy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 512–524.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sanchez, D. T., Good, J., Kwang, T., & Saltzman, E. (2008). When finding a mate becomes urgent: Why relationship contingency predicts men’s and women’s body shame. Social Psychology, 39, 90–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schlenker, J. A., Caron, S. L., & Halteman, W. A. (1998). A feminist analysis of Seventeen magazine: Content analysis from 1945 to 1995. Sex Roles, 38, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime user’s guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.Google Scholar
  39. Silverstein, B., Perdue, L., Peterson, B., & Kelly, E. (1986). The role of the mass media in promoting a thin standard of bodily attractiveness for women. Sex Roles, 14, 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, J. E., Waldorf, V. A., & Trembath, D. L. (1990). ‘Single White male looking for thin, very attractive...’. Sex Roles, 23, 675–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stockdale, M. S. (1996). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Perspectives, frontiers, and response strategies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Strelan, P., & Hargreaves, D. (2005). Women who objectify other women: The vicious circle of objectification? Sex Roles, 52, 707–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thompson, J. K. (1996). Body image, eating disorders, and obesity: An integrative guide for assessment and treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  44. Tiggemann, M., & Lynch, J. E. (2001). Body image across the life span in adult women: The role of self-objectification. Developmental Psychology, 37, 243–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tiggemann, M., & Kuring, J. K. (2004). The role of body objectification in disordered eating and depressed mood. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 299–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tolman, D. L., Impett, E. A., Tracy, A. J., & Michael, A. (2006). Looking good, sounding good: Femininity ideology and adolescent girls’ mental health. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiederman, M. W., & Hurst, S. R. (1998). Body size, physical attractiveness, and body image among young adult women: Relationships to sexual experience and sexual esteem. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 272–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA

Personalised recommendations