Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 3–4, pp 274–281 | Cite as

Where are the Gender Differences? Male Priming Boosts Spatial Skills in Women

Original Article

Abstract

The effects of gender stereotype activation by priming on performance in a spatial task were investigated among a mixed adult sample (including students) of 161 men and women (mean age = 31.90) from Austria (Europe). They were assigned to one of four experimental groups according to gender and stereotype activation condition. After a male or female gender stereotype activating task, participants worked on a test assessing mental rotation (three-dimensional cube test, Gittler 1990). A significant main effect of priming on the performance in the mental rotation task emerged. Cohen’s d showed a pronounced gender difference emerging only in the female priming condition (d = .59), whereas it disappeared in the male priming condition (d = .01).

Keywords

Gender priming Gender differences Spatial skills Mental rotation Test fairness 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Melanie Fiegl, Michaela Kacvincka, Sandra Peyerl, Nicole Pritz and Sandra Raffetseder for their help with the data collection and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.

References

  1. Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1996). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Best, D. L. (2001). Gender concepts: convergence in cross-cultural research and methodologies. Cross-cultural research. The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 35, 23–43.Google Scholar
  4. Birenbaum, M., Kelley, A. E., & Levi-Keren, M. (1994). Stimulus features and sex differences in mental rotation test performance. Intelligence, 19, 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bornholt, L. J., Goodnow, J. J., & Cooney, G. H. (1994). Influences of gender stereotypes on adolescents’ perceptions of their own achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 675–692.Google Scholar
  6. Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  8. Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: an interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Désert, M., & Leyens, J.-P. (2006). Social comparison across cultures I: Gender stereotypes in high and low power distance cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 303–317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J. A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). San Diego. CA.: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dittmann, J., & Scheuer, A. (2007). Berufstätigkeit von Müttern bleibt kontrovers [Occupation of mothers remains controversial]. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren, 38, 1–5.Google Scholar
  14. Durik, A. M., Hyde, J. S., Marks, A. C., Roy, A. L., Anaya, D., & Schultz, G. (2006). Ethnicity and gender stereotypes of emotion. Sex Roles, 54, 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale/NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, K., & Lindholm, T. (2007). Making gender matter: the role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women’s and men’s math performance in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 329–338.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission (2006). She figures 2006, women and science, statistics and indicators: European Communities.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission (2007). Database—social and economic domain: decision-making in the largest publicly quoted companies.Google Scholar
  20. Fay, E. (1996). Tests unter der Lupe. Aktuelle Leistungstests-kritisch betrachtet [A closer examination of current performance tests from a critical point of view] (Band 1. Testrezension 3DW (S. 21–27). Heidelberg: Asanger.Google Scholar
  21. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flaherty, M. (2005). Gender differences in mental rotation ability in three cultures: Ireland, Ecuador and Japan. Psychologia, 48, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frieze, I. H., Ferligoj, A., Kogovsek, T., Rener, T., Horvat, J., & Sarlija, N. (2003). Gender-role attitudes in university students in the United States, Slovenia and Croatia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Furnham, A., Fong, G., & Martin, F. (1999). Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multifaceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Geary, D. C., & DeSoto, M. C. (2001). Sex differences in spatial abilities among adults from the United States and China: implications for evolutionary theory. Evolution and Cognition, 7, 172–177.Google Scholar
  27. Gibbons, L. J., Stiles, D. A., & Shkodriani, G. M. (1991). Adolescents’ attitudes toward family and gender roles: an international comparison. Sex Roles, 25, 625–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gittler, G. (1990). Dreidimensionaler Würfeltest (3DW) [Three-dimensional cube test]. Beltz: Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  29. Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P., & Collet, C. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health and Sciences Education, 12, 1573–1677.Google Scholar
  30. Guimond, S., Branscombe, N. R., Brunot, S., Buunk, A. P., Chatard, A., Desert, M., et al. (2007). Culture, gender, and the self: variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1118–1134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Hamilton, C. J. (1995). Beyond sex differences in visuo-spatial processing. The impact of gender trait possession. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 1–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris, A. C. (1994). Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: a replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 31, 241–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: perception or rationalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.Google Scholar
  37. Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of gender differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Luehring, J., & Altman, J. D. (2000). Factors contributing to sex differences in the mental rotation task. Psi Chi, 5, 39–35.Google Scholar
  42. Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the mental rotations test is not due to performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 26, 444–448.Google Scholar
  43. McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Newcombe, N., & Bandura, M. M. (1983). Effect of age at puberty on spatial ability in girls: a question of mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 19, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Olson, J. E., Frieze, I. H., Wall, S., Zdaniuk, B., Ferligoj, A., Kogovsek, T., et al. (2007). Beliefs in equality for women and men as related to economic factors in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States. Sex Roles, 56, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Oosthuizen, S. (1991). Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 51–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petrusic, W. M., Varro, L., & Jamieson, D. G. (1978). Mental rotation validation of two spatial ability tests. Psychological Research, 40, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2000). Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rasanen, L. (1991). Girls and the learning of physical concepts. Finnish Journal of Education, 22, 185–194.Google Scholar
  51. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielsen & Lydiche.Google Scholar
  52. Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits. Brain and Cognition, 21, 71–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanders, B., & Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation and spatial ability in college students. Developmental Psychology, 22, 199–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scali, M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43, 359–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., & Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender. Instructional and stimulus influence on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J. A., Fujita, K., & Gray, H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: the impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vandenberg, S. G. (1971). Mental rotation test. University of Colorado: Boulder.Google Scholar
  62. Voyer, D., Rodgers, M. A., & McCormick, P. A. (2004). Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the mental rotation task. Memory and Cognition, 23, 72–82.Google Scholar
  63. Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Weiss, E. M., Kemmler, G., Deisenhammer, E. A., Fleischhacker, W. W., & Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 863–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wheeler, S. C., Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Think unto others: the self-destructive impact of negative stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 173–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  68. Windischberger, C., Lamm, C., Bauer, H., & Moser, E. (2003). Human motor cortex activity during mental rotation. NeuroImage, 20, 225–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology, Division for Psychological AssessmentHumboldt University BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Division for Differential and Gender PsychologyUniversity of HeidelbergHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations