Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 5–6, pp 404–417 | Cite as

What Happens When We Unpack the Invisible Knapsack? Intersectional Political Consciousness and Inter-group Appraisals

  • Ronni Michelle Greenwood
  • Aidan Christian
Original Article

Abstract

How does consciousness of the intersection of white privilege with gender discrimination affect white women’s appraisals of Muslim women? White, female, non-Muslim undergraduates at a Scottish university (n = 37) were primed with either singular or intersectional group consciousness via a measure of political attitudes before they completed an ostensibly unrelated study about impression formation. As predicted, participants primed with intersectional consciousness reported more accepting attitudes toward covering practices and formed more positive impressions of the Muslim woman, but this effect was moderated by participants’ political orientation. Results support an intersectional approach to conceptualizing political consciousness and suggest that the content of political consciousness is key to understanding appraisals of and responses to difference.

Keywords

Intersectionality Political consciousness Impression formation 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Eamonn Glancy for assistance with data collection. They would also like to thank two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  2. Albrecht, L., & Brewer, R. M. (1990). Bridges of power: Women’s multicultural alliances.Google Scholar
  3. Asthana, A., & Hinsliff, G. (2004). Equality chief branded as ‘right wing’. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,6903,1185376,00.html.
  4. Collins, P. H. (2000). Black Feminist Thought (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Crenshaw, K. W. (1994). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women. In M.A. Fineman & R. Mykitiuk (Eds.) The public nature of private violence (pp. 93–120). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, M. (1982). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dill, B. T. (1983). Race, class and gender: Prospects for an all inclusive sisterhood. Feminist Studies, 9, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Galinsky, A. D. (2002). Creating and reducing intergroup conflict: The role of perspective taking in affecting out-group evaluations. In H. Sondak, M. A. Neale, & E. A. Mannix (Eds.) Research in managing groups and teams, Vol. 4: Toward a phenomenology of groups and group membership (pp. 85–113). Stamford: CT: JAI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glover, P. C. (2006). Muslim apartheid: Getting behind the veil. Retrieved March 18, 2008, from http://catholicinsight.com/online/culture/article_691.shtml
  10. Greenwood, R. M. (2008). Intersectional political consciousness: Appreciation for intragroup differences and solidarity in diverse groups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gurin, P., Miller, A. H., & Gurin, G. (1980). Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(1), 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gurin, P., & Townsend, A. (1986). Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 139–148.Google Scholar
  13. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Iyer, A., Leach, C. W., & Crosby, F. J. (2003). White guilt and racial compensation: The benefits and limits of self-focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 117–129.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1996). Intergroup norms and intergroup discrimination: Distinctive self-categorization and social identity effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1222–1233.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A. S. R. (1997). Strength of identification and intergroup differentiation: The influence of group norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 603–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnston, P. (2008). Multiculturalism is breeding intolerance. Retrieved 18 March, 2008 from, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2008/01/07/do0702.xml
  19. McIntosh, P. (1990). White privilege: Unpacking the invisible knapsack. Independent School, 49, 31–36.Google Scholar
  20. Moraga, C., & Anzaldúa, G. (1983). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of color. New York: Kitchen Table: Women of Color Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, S. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Powell, A. A., Branscombe, N. R., & Schmitt, M. T. (2005). Inequality as ingroup privilege or outgroup disadvantage: The impact of group focus on collective guilt and interracial attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 508–521.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saucier, D. A., & Miller, C. T. (2003). The persuasiveness of racial arguments as a subtle measure of racism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1303–1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmitt, M., & Maes, J. (1998). Perceived injustice in unified Germany and mental health. Social Justice Research, 11, 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmitt, M., & Maes, J. (2002). Stereotypic ingroup bias as self-defense against relative deprivation: Evidence from a longitudinal study of the German unification process. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Schmitt, M., Maes, J., & Reichle, B. (2001). Responsibility and attitudes towards the disadvantaged. In H.W. Bierhoff & A.E. Auhagen (Eds.) Responsibility—The many faces of a social phenomenon (pp. 167–178). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. C. (1972). Short, homogeneous version of the Marlow–Crowne Social Desirability Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28, 191–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of group differentiation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.) Differentiation between social groups (pp. 77–98). New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  29. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA.: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  30. Turner, J. C. (1999). Current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears, & B. Doosje (Eds.) Social identity: Context, commitment, content. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford, U.K.: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyDundee UniversityDundeeScotland
  2. 2.Psychology DepartmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations