Sex Roles

, Volume 58, Issue 7–8, pp 490–500 | Cite as

Social Influences on Judgments of Rape Victims: The Role of the Negative and Positive Social Reactions of Others

  • Amy L. BrownEmail author
  • Maria Testa
Original Article


An experimental study examined whether judgments about a rape victim can be influenced by the social reactions of others, and whether this effect would be moderated by the type of rape (stranger or date rape) or by the gender of the participants. One hundred and ten U.S. college students (90% white; 59% female) responded to rape vignettes in which the type of rape and the social reactions received by the victim (negative, positive, or neutral) were manipulated. People exposed to negative social reactions made less positive judgments. Men and people who read about a date rape also made less positive judgments, but neither variable interacted with type of reactions to impact judgments.


Rape Social support Social influence Social perception Victimization 



This research was conducted while Amy Brown was a graduate student at Miami University in Oxford, OH. This research was presented at the 8th annual conference of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology in Memphis, TN. We would like to thank Terri Messman-Moore and members of her research lab at Miami University for assistance conducting this research.


  1. Abrams, D., Viki, G. T., Masser, B., & Bohner, G. (2003). Perceptions of stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent and hostile sexism in victim blame and rape proclivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 111–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, I., & Lyons, A. (2005). The effect of victims’ social support on attributions of blame in female and male rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1400–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Batson, C. D., Polycarpou, M. P., Harmon-Jones, E., Imhoff, H. J., Mitchener, E. C., Bednar, L. L., et al. (1997). Empathy and attitudes: Can feeling for a member of a stigmatized group improve feelings toward the group as a whole? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 105–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, S. T., Kuriloff, P. J., & Lottes, I. (1994). Understanding attributions of blame in stranger and date rape situations: An examination of gender, race, identification, and students’ social perceptions of rape victims. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 1719–1734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buddie, A. M., Brown, A. L., Bakker, A. I., & Miller, A. G. (2003). It’s terrible that she’s traumatized, but she shouldn’t have led him on: Ambivalent attitudes toward rape victims. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.) Advances in psychology research, vol. 21 (pp. 141–155). Huntington, NY: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. Buddie, A. M., & Miller, A. G. (2001). Beyond rape myths: A more complex view of perceptions of rape victims. Sex Roles, 45, 139–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, R., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., Wasco, S. M., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Social reactions to rape victims: Healing and hurtful effects on psychological and physical health outcomes. Violence and Victims, 16, 287–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Carlston, D. E., & Skowronski, J. J. (2005). Thinking: Evidence for the different associative and attributional bases of spontaneous trait transference and spontaneous trait inference. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 884–898.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cialdini, R. B. (2001). Influence: Science and practice (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology, vol. 2 ((pp. 151–192)4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Coates, D., Wortman, C. B., & Abbey, A. (1979). Reactions to victims. In I. H. Frieze, D. Bar-Tal, & J. S. Carrol (Eds.) New approaches to social problems (pp. 21–52). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Dovidio, J. F., Major, B., & Crocker, J. (2000). Stigma: Introduction and overview. In T. F. Heatherton, R. E. Kleck, M. R. Hebl, & J. G. Hull (Eds.) The social psychology of stigma (pp. 1–9). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  14. Filipas, H. H., & Ullman, S. E. (2001). Social reactions to sexual assault victims from various support sources. Violence and Victims, 16, 673–692.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, B. S., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2000). The sexual victimization of college women. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.Google Scholar
  16. Frese, B., Moya, M., & Megías, J. L. (2004). Social perception of rape: How rape myth acceptance modulates the influence of situational factors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 143–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gilbert, D. T. (1998). Ordinary personology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 ((pp. 89–149)4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  18. Kopper, B. A. (1996). Gender, gender identity, rape myth acceptance, and time of initial resistance on the perception of acquaintance rape blame and avoidability. Sex Roles, 34, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krahé, B. (1992). Coping with rape: A social psychological perspective. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.) Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 477–496). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Norris, J., & Cubbins, L. A. (1992). Dating, drinking, and rape: Effects of victim’s and assailant’s alcohol consumption on judgments of their behavior and traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pollard, P. (1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 307–326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shotland, R. L., & Goodstein, L. (1983). Just because she doesn’t want it doesn’t mean it’s rape: An experimentally based causal model of the perception of rape in a dating situation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 220–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ullman, S. E. (1999). Social support and recovery from sexual assault: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4, 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ullman, S. E. (2000). Psychometric characteristics of the Social Reactions Questionnaire: A measure of reactions to sexual assault victims. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Vrij, A., & Firmin, H. R. (2001). Beautiful thus innocent? The impact of defendants’ and victims’ physical attractiveness and participants’ rape beliefs on impression formation in alleged rape cases. International Review of Victimology, 8, 245–255.Google Scholar
  28. Workman, J. E., & Freeburg, E. W. (1999). An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute on AddictionsUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New YorkBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations