Sex Roles

, Volume 58, Issue 5–6, pp 423–434 | Cite as

Effects of Attire, Alcohol, and Gender on Perceptions of Date Rape

  • Trent W. MaurerEmail author
  • David W. Robinson
Original Article


This investigation explored three categories of college students’ perceptions of sexual assault: perceptions of similarity to vignette characters, perceptions of vignette characters’ sexual intent, and victim-blaming behaviors, using a convenience sample of 652 U.S. undergraduates and an on-line factorial survey containing a two-part heterosexual date rape vignette. This investigation predicted that vignette character attire, character alcohol use, and participant gender would each significantly influence perceptions in all three categories. Strong associations appeared between all three experimental variables and perceptions, with characters that wore suggestive attire or became intoxicated perceived as less similar and having greater sexual intent than characters that wore neutral attire or abstained. Few differences in actual victim-blaming appeared, likely because of the elimination of hindsight bias.


Date rape Victim perception Factorial vignette 



This work was funded by a Student–Faculty Collaborative Research Grant from Georgia Southern University. The authors would like to thank Megan Donecker, ShaTara Jackson, Crystal Martin, and Dr. Lori Amy for their help on this project. The authors would also like to thank the editor and two reviewers for their feedback and suggestions. Portions of this paper were previously presented at the 2006 National Conference on Undergraduate Research, Asheville, NC, and the 2006 National Conference of the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.


  1. Abbey, A., Cozzarelli, C., McLaughlin, K., & Harnish, R. J. (1987). The effects of clothing and dyad sex composition on perceptions of sexual intent: Do women and men evaluate these cues differently? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 108–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cameron, C. A., & Stritzke, W. G. K. (2003). Alcohol and acquaintance rape in Australia: Testing the presupposition model of attributions about responsibility and blame. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 983–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cassidy, L., & Hurell, R. M. (1995). The influence of victim’s attire on adolescents’ judgments of date rape. Adolescence, 30, 319–323.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cowan, G. (2000). Women’s hostility toward women and rape and sexual harassment myths. Violence Against Women, 6, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. George, W. H., Gournic, S. J., & McAfee, M. P. (1988). Perceptions of postdrinking female sexuality: Effects of gender, beverage choice, and drink payment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1295–1317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hannon, T., Kuntz, T., Van Laar, S., Williams, J., & Hall, D. S. (1996). College students’ judgments regarding sexual aggression during a date. Sex Roles, 35, 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Howells, K., Shaw, F., Greasley, M., Robertson, J., Gloster, D., & Metcalfe, N. (1984). Perceptions of rape in a British sample: Effects of relationship, victim status, sex, and attitudes to women. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Janoff-Bulman, R., Timko, C., & Carli, L. L. (1985). Cognitive biases in blaming the victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 161–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Johnson, K. K. P. (1995). Attributions about date rape: Impact of clothing, sex, money spent, date type, and perceived similarity. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 23, 292–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson, K. K. P., Hegland, J. E., & Schofield, N. A. (1999). Survivors of rape: Functions and implications of dress in a context of coercive power. In K. K. P. Johnson, & S. J. Lennon (Eds.) Appearance and power pp. 11–32. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, K. K. P., & Lee, M. (2000). Effects of clothing and behavior on perceptions concerning an alleged date rape. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 28, 331–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  13. Krahe, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Muehlenhard, C., & MacNaughton, J. (1988). Women’s beliefs about women who “lead men on”. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 7, 65–79.Google Scholar
  17. Osman, S. L., & Davis, C. M. (1999). Predicting perceptions of date rape based on individual beliefs and female alcohol consumption. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 701–709.Google Scholar
  18. Proite, R., Dannells, M., & Benton, S. L. (1993). Gender, sex role stereotypes, and the attribution of responsibility for date and acquaintance rape. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 411–417.Google Scholar
  19. Roach-Higgins, M. E., & Eicher, J. B. (1992). Dress and identity. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 10, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schuller, R. A., & Stewart, A. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 535–551.Google Scholar
  21. Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sinclair, H. C., & Bourne Jr., L. E. (1998). Cycle of blame or just world: Effects of legal verdicts on gender patterns in rape-myth acceptance and victim empathy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 575–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Stormo, K. J., Lang, A. R., & Stritzke, W. G. K. (1997). Attributions about acquaintance rape: The role of alcohol and individual differences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 279–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whatley, M. A. (2005). The effect of participant sex, victim dress, and traditional attitudes on causal judgments for marital rape victims. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Workman, J. E., & Freeburg, E. W. (1999). An examination of date rape, victim dress, and perceiver variables within the context of attribution theory. Sex Roles, 41, 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Workman, J. E., & Orr, R. L. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 276–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yarmey, A. D. (1985). Older and younger adults’ attributions of responsibility toward rape victims and rapists. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 17, 327–338.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hospitality, Tourism, and Family & Consumer SciencesGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Literature & PhilosophyGeorgia Southern UniversityStatesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations