The Interpersonal Power of Feminism: Is Feminism Good for Romantic Relationships?
- 2.7k Downloads
Past research suggests that women and men alike perceive feminism and romance to be in conflict (Rudman and Fairchild, Psychol Women Q, 31:125–136, 2007). A survey of US undergraduates (N = 242) and an online survey of older US adults (N = 289) examined the accuracy of this perception. Using self-reported feminism and perceived partners’ feminism as predictors of relationship health, results revealed that having a feminist partner was linked to healthier relationships for women. Additionally, men with feminist partners reported greater relationship stability and sexual satisfaction in the online survey. Finally, there was no support for negative feminist stereotypes (i.e., that feminists are single, lesbians, or unattractive). In concert, the findings reveal that beliefs regarding the incompatibility of feminism and romance are inaccurate.
KeywordsFeminism Close relationships Feminist stereotypes Intergroup relations Gender attitudes
This research was partially supported by Grants BCS-0109997 and BCS-0417335 from the National Science Foundation.
- Bell, D., & Klein, R. (1996). Radically speaking: Feminism reclaimed. Victoria, Australia: Spinifex.Google Scholar
- Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. NY: Academic.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- De Beauvoir, S. (1952). The second sex. NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
- Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Faludi, S. (1991). The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
- Firestone, S. (1970). The dialectic of sex: The case for a feminist revolution. NY: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Stevens, L. E. (1993). What’s so special about sex? Gender stereotyping and discrimination. In S. Oskamp, & M. Costanzo (Eds.) Gender issues in contemporary society (pp. 173–196). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Holland, D. C. (1992). How cultural systems become desire: A case study of American romance. In R. G. D’Andrade, & C. Strauss (Eds.) Human motives and cultural models (pp. 61–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Holland, D. C., & Eisenhart, M. A. (1990). Educated in romance: Women, achievement, and college culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Levy, A. (2005). Female chauvinist pigs: Women and the rise of raunch culture. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Millet, K. (1970). Sexual politics. NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Misciagno, P. S. (1997). Rethinking feminist identification: The case for de facto feminism. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research: Explanation and prediction (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rhinhart, & Winston.Google Scholar
- Rich, E. (2005). Young women, feminist identities and neo-liberalism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28, 495–508.Google Scholar
- Sigel, R. (1996). Ambition and accommodation: How women view gender relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Swim, J. K., Ferguson, M. J., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Avoiding stigma by association: Subtle prejudice against lesbians in the form of social distancing. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 61–68.Google Scholar
- Taylor, J. K. (1992). Reclaiming the mainstream: Individualist feminism rediscovered. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
- Valian, V. (1999). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar