Sex Roles

, Volume 57, Issue 9–10, pp 775–786 | Cite as

Masculinity Ideology, Male Identity, and Romantic Relationship Quality Among Heterosexual and Gay Men

  • Jay C. WadeEmail author
  • Eric Donis
Original Article


This research assessed factors that may affect men’s romantic relationships. One hundred men (50 heterosexual and 50 gay) in the Northeast US completed measures that assessed masculinity ideology, male identity, and relationship quality. We examined whether the quality of heterosexual men’s romantic relationships differ from that of romantic relationships among gay men, and whether masculinity ideology and male identity are related to the quality of heterosexual and same-sex romantic relationships. Results indicated no differences between heterosexual and gay men in the perceived quality of romantic relationships. However, in both gay and heterosexual men, traditional masculinity ideology and a male identity characterized by a lack of psychological relatedness to other men were associated with lower quality romantic relationships.


Masculinity ideology Male identity Gay men Relationship quality 


  1. Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997). Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burn, S. M., & Ward, A. Z. (2005). Men’s conformity to traditional masculinity and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 254–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, J. L., & Snow, B. M. (1992). Gender role conflict and family environment as predictors of men’s marital satisfaction. Journal of Family Psychology, 6, 84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cohen, S., & Willis, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. David, D., & Brannon, R. (1976). The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Di-Dio, L., Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., & Aube, J. (1996). Linking personal values to gender. Sex Roles, 34, 621–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elizur, Y., & Mintzer, A. (2003). Gay males’ intimate relationship quality: The roles of attachment security, gay identity, social support, and income. Personal Relationships, 10, 411–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Englar-Carlson, M., & Stevens, M. A. (Eds.) (2006). In the room with men: A casebook of therapeutic change. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity youth and crisis. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  12. Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzpatrick, M. K., Salgado, D. M., Suvak, M. K., King, L. A., & King, D. W. (2004). Associations of gender and gender-role ideology with behavioral and attitudinal features of intimate partner aggression. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 5, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin, C. (1984). The changing definition of masculinity. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  15. Garthoeffner, J. L., Henry, C. S., & Robinson, L. C. (1993). The modified interpersonal relationships scale: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 73, 995–1004.Google Scholar
  16. Harris, I. M. (1995). Messages men hear. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  17. Huston, M., & Schwartz, P. (2002). Gendered dynamics in the romantic relationships of lesbians and gay men. In A. E. Hunter & C. Forden (Eds.), Readings in the psychology of gender: Exploring our differences and commonalities (pp. 167–178). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  18. Kurdek, L. A. (1994). The nature and correlates of relationship quality in gay, lesbian, and heterosexual cohabiting couples. In B. Greene & G. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 133–155). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Kurdek, L. A. (2004). Are gay and lesbian cohabiting couples really different from heterosexual married couples? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 66, 880–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kurdek, L. A. (2005). What do we know about gay and lesbian couples. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 251–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986a). Relationship quality of partners in heterosexual married, heterosexual cohabiting, and gay and lesbian relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 711–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. P. (1986b). Interaction of sex role self-concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 365–370.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Levant, R. F. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 3, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Levant, R. F., Hirsch, L., Celentano, E., Cozza, T., Hill, S., MacEachern, M., et al. (1992). The male role: An investigation of norms and stereotypes. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 325–337.Google Scholar
  25. Levant, R. F., & Richmond, K. (2004). A review of research on masculinity ideologies using the Male Role Norms Inventory. Paper presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.Google Scholar
  26. Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2) (pp. 268–294). New York: Free.Google Scholar
  27. Lippa, R. A., & Tan, F. D. (2001). Does culture moderate the relationship between sexual orientation and gender-related personality traits? Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 35, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu, W. (2002). Exploring the lives of Asian American men: Racial identity, male role norms, gender role conflict, and prejudicial attitudes. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 3, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markstrom, H. M., & Kalmanir, H. M. (2001). Linkages between the psychosocial stages of identity and intimacy and the ego strengths of fidelity and love. Identity, 1, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCreary, D. R. (1990). Multidimensionality and the measurement of gender role attributes: A comment on Archer. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 265–272.Google Scholar
  31. Means-Christensen, A. J. (2003). Assessing nontraditional couples: Validity of the Marital Satisfaction Inventory—Revised with gay, lesbian, and cohabiting heterosexual couples. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29, 69–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mohr, J. J., & Fassinger, R. E. (2006). Sexual orientation identity and romantic relationship quality in same-sex couples. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 1085–1099.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. O’Neil, J. M. (1981). Male sex role conflicts, sexism, and masculinity: Psychological implications for men, women, and the counseling psychologist. The Counseling Psychologist, 9, 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. O’Neil, J. M., Good, G. E., & Holmes, S. (1995). Fifteen years of theory and research on men’s gender role conflict: New paradigms for empirical research. In R. Levant & W. Pollack (Eds.), The new psychology of men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. O’Neil, J. M., Helms, B., Gable, R., David, L., & Wrightsman, L. (1986). Gender-role conflict scale: College men’s fear of femininity. Sex Roles, 14, 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peplau, L. A. (1993). Lesbian and gay relationships. In L. D. Garnets & D. C. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male experiences (pp. 395–419). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Pleck, J. H. (1995). The gender role strain paradigm: An update. In R. F. Levant & W. S. Pollack (Eds.), A new psychology of men(pp. 11–32). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1993). Masculinity ideology: Its impact on adolescent males’ heterosexual relationships. Journal of Social Issues, 49, 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rochlen, A. B., & Mahalik, J. R. (2004). Women’s perceptions of male partners’ gender role conflict as predictors of psychological well-being and relationship satisfaction. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5, 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rook, K. S., & Pietromonaco, P. (1987). Close relationships: Ties that heal or ties that bind? Advances in Personal Relationships, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  41. Schlein, S., Guerney, B. G., Jr., & Stover, L. (1990). The interpersonal relationships scale. In J. Touliatos, B. F. Perlmutter, & M. A. Straus (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Schuster, T. L., Kessler, R. C., & Aseltine, R. H. (1990). Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423–437.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sharpe, M. J., Heppner, P. P., & Dixon, W. A. (1995). Gender role conflict, instrumentality, expressiveness, and well-being in adult men. Sex Roles, 33, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siavelis, R. L., & Lamke, L. K. (1992). Instrumentalness and expressiveness: Predictors of heterosexual relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 26, 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Spanier, G. B., & Lewis, R. A. (1980). Marital quality: A review of the Seventies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42, 825–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sprecher, S., & Hendrick, S. S. (2004). Self-disclosure in intimate relationships: Associations with individual and relationship characteristics over time. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 857–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Steiner-Pappalardo, N. L., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2002). The femininity effect: Relationship quality, sex, gender, attachment, and significant-other concepts. Personal Relationships, 9, 313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor, S. E. (1995). Health psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  51. Truman, D. M., Tokar, D. M., & Fischer, A. R. (1996). Dimensions of masculinity: Relations to date rape supportive attitudes and sexual aggression in dating situations. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74, 555–562.Google Scholar
  52. Wade, J. C. (1998). Male reference group identity dependence: A theory of male identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 349–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wade, J. C. (2001). Professional men’s attitudes toward race and gender equity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 10(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wade, J. C., & Brittan-Powell, C. S. (2000). Male reference group identity dependence: Support for construct validity. Sex Roles, 43, 323–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wade, J. C., & Brittan-Powell, C. S. (2001). Men’s attitudes toward race and gender equity: The importance of masculinity ideology, gender related traits, and reference group identity dependence. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 2, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wade, J. C., & Gelso, C. J. (1998). Reference group identity dependence scale: A measure of male identity. The Counseling Psychologist, 26, 384–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watson, D., Hubbard, B., & Wiese, D. (2000). General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: Evidence from self- and partner-ratings. Journal of Personality, 68, 413–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wester, S. R., Pionke, D. R., & Vogel, D. L. (2005). Male gender role conflict, gay men, and same-sex romantic relationships. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 195–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Willis, T. A. (1985). Supportive functions of relationships. In S. Cohen & L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 61–82). New York: Academic.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentFordham UniversityBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations