A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants
Letters of recommendation are central to the hiring process. However, gender stereotypes could bias how recommenders describe female compared to male applicants. In the current study, text analysis software was used to examine 886 letters of recommendation written on behalf of 235 male and 42 female applicants for either a chemistry or biochemistry faculty position at a large U.S. research university. Results revealed more similarities than differences in letters written for male and female candidates. However, recommenders used significantly more standout adjectives to describe male as compared to female candidates. Letters containing more standout words also included more ability words and fewer grindstone words. Research is needed to explore how differences in language use affect perceivers’ evaluations of female candidates.
KeywordsGender schemas Sexism Implicit biases Hiring decisions Chemistry
- Biernat, M., & Eidelman, S. (2007). Translating subjective language in letters of recommendation: The case of the sexist professor. European Journal of Social Psychology (in press).Google Scholar
- Heilman, M. E. (1995). Sex stereotypes and their effects in the workplace: What we know and what we don’t know. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 3–26.Google Scholar
- Mehl, M. R. (2005). Quantitative text analysis. In M. Eid & E. Diener (Eds.), Handbook of multimethod measurement in psychology (pp. 141–156). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Nelson, D. (2005). A national analysis of diversity in science and engineering faculties at research universities. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from http://cheminfo.chem.ou.edu.
- Pennebaker, J. W., Francis, M. E., & Booth, R. J. (2001). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC2001. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2007). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
- Valian, V. (1998). Why so slow? The advancement of women. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar