Sex Roles

, Volume 57, Issue 7–8, pp 569–578

Do Third-Person Perceptions of Media Influence Contribute to Pluralistic Ignorance on the Norm of Ideal Female Thinness?

  • Sung-Yeon Park
  • Gi Woong Yun
  • Jacqueline Hitchon McSweeney
  • Albert C. Gunther
Original Article

Abstract

This study investigated the pluralistic ignorance on the norm of ideal female thinness and also the presumed influence of thin idealized media images as the cause of the misperception. A survey of 111 female and 109 male US undergraduate students revealed that both women and men overestimated the thinness of body type preferred by others. In addition, men reported that others would be more affected by the media than self while women considered themselves to be as vulnerable as others. Subsequent regression analyses demonstrated that the difference in the perceived media influence on self and others was a significant predictor of the norm of ideal female thinness. Similar misperceptions were also found between men and women in dating relationships.

Keywords

Third-person effect Pluralistic ignorance Body image Eating disorders Dating relationships 

References

  1. Bailey, R. C., & Chorosevic, P. (1980). Congruency and accuracy of body build perceptions in dating couples. Social Behavior and Personality, 8, 113–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey, R. C., & Mettetal, G. (1977). Perceived intelligence in marital partners. Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 137–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey, R. C., & Price, J. P. (1978). Perceived physical attractiveness in married partners of long and short duration. Journal of Psychology, 99, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Botta, R. A. (1999). Television images and adolescent girls’ body image disturbance. Journal of Communication, 49, 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen, A. M., & Bourgeois, M. J. (2001). Attitudes toward lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students: The contribution of pluralistic ignorance, dynamic social impact, and contact theories. Journal of American College Health, 50, 91–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosius, H., Engel, D. (1996). The cause of third-person effects: Unrealistic optimism, impersonal impact, or generalized negative attitudes toward media influence? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 8, 142–162.Google Scholar
  7. Christen, C. T., Kannaovakun, P., & Gunther, A. C. (2002). Hostile media perceptions: Partisan assessments of press and public during the 1997 UPS strike. Political Communication, 19, 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark, L., & Tiggemann, M. (2007). Sociocultural influences and body image in 9- to 12-year-old girls: The role of appearance schemas. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 76–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, L. L., & Shotland, R. L. (1996). Timing of first sexual intercourse in a relationship: Expectations, experiences, and perceptions of others. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohn, L. D., & Adler, N. E. (1992). Female and male perceptions of ideal body shapes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohn, I. D., Adler, N. E., Irwin, C. E. J., Millstein, S. G., Kegeles, S. M., & Stone, G. (1987). Body-figure preferences in male and female adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 96, 276–279.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cusumano, D. L., & Thompson, J. K. (1997). Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: Exposure, awareness, and internalization. Sex Roles, 37, 701–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. David, P., & Johnson, M. A. (1998). The role of self in third-person effects about body image. Journal of Communication, 48, 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. David, P., Morrison, G., Johnson, M. A., & Ross, F. (2002). Body image, race, and fashion models: Social distance and social identification in third-person effects. Communication Research, 29, 270–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Davis, L. L. (1985). Perceived somatotypes, body-cathexis, and attitudes toward clothing among college females. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 61, 1199–1205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Duck, J. M., & Mullin, B. (1995). The perceived impact of the mass media: Reconsidering the third person effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fallon, A. E., & Rozin, P. (1985). Sex differences in perceptions of desirable body shape. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 94, 102–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gunther, A. C. (1991). What we think others think: Cause and consequence in the third-person effect. Communication Research, 18, 355–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunther, A. C., & Chia, S. C. (2001). Predicting pluralistic ignorance: The hostile media perception and its consequences. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78, 688–701.Google Scholar
  20. Gunther, A. C., & Christen, C. T. (2002). Projection or persuasive press? Contrary effects of personal opinion and perceived news coverage on estimates of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 52, 177–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harrison, K. (2000). The body electric: Thin ideal media and eating disorders in adolescents. Journal of Communication, 50, 119–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harrison, K., & Cantor, J. (1997). The relationship between media consumption and eating disorders. Journal of Communication, 47, 40–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harrison, K., Taylor, L. D., & Marske, A. L. (2006). Women’s and men’s eating behavior following exposure to ideal-body images and text. Communication Research, 33, 507–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henderson-King, D., Henderson-King, E., & Hoffman, L. (2001). Media images and women’s self-evaluation: Social context and importance of attractiveness as moderators. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 1407–1416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henriksen, L., & Flora, J. A. (1999). Third-person perception and children: Perceived impact of pro- and anti-smoking ads. Communication Research, 26, 643–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jacoby, L., & Cash, T. F. (1994). In pursuit of the perfect appearance: Discrepancies among self-ideal percepts of multiple physical attributes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambert, T. A., Kahn, A. S., & Apple, K. J. (2003). Pluralistic ignorance and hooking up. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 129–133.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Levine, M. P., & Harrison, K. (2004). Media’s role in the perpetuation and prevention of negative body image and disordered eating. In J. K. Thompson (Ed.), Handbook of eating disorders and obesity (pp. 695–717). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Milkie, M. (1999). Social comparisons, reflected appraisals, and mass media: The impact of pervasive beauty images on Black and White girls’ self-concepts. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 190–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Miller, D. T., & McFarland, C. (1987). Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 298–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24, 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paxton, S. J., Wertheim, E. H., Gibbons, K., Szmukler, G. I., Hillier, L., & Petrovich, J. L. (1991). Body image satisfaction, dieting beliefs, and weight loss behaviors in adolescent girls and boys. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 20, 361–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perloff, R. M. (1989). Ego-involvement and the third person effect of televised news coverage. Communication Research, 16, 236–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perloff, R. M. (1993). Third-person effect research 1983–1992: A review and synthesis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Perse, E. M. (2001). Media effects and society. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.Google Scholar
  36. Pike K. M., & Rodin, J. (1991). Mothers, daughters, and disordered eating. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100, 198–204.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 243–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ricciardelli, L. A., & McCabe, M. P. (2001). Children’s body image concerns and eating disturbance: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 21, 325–344.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Rozin, P., & Fallon, A. E. (1988). Body image, attitudes to weight and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: A comparison of men and women in two generations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 342–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Schroeder, C. M., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 2150–2180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shamir, J., & Shamir, M. (1997). Pluralistic ignorance across issues and over time: Information cues and biases. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 227–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smolak, L. (1999). Elementary school curricula for the primary prevention of eating problems. In N. Piran, M. P. Levine, & C. Steiner-Adair (Eds.), Preventing eating disorders: A handbook of interventions and special challenges (pp. 85–104). Philadelphia: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  43. Spillman, D. M., & Everington, C. (1989). Somatotypes revisited: Have the media changed our perception of the female body image? Psychological Reports, 64, 887–890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Taylor, D. G. (1982). Pluralistic ignorance and the spiral of silence: A formal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 46, 311–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vallone, R., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. (1985). The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 49, 577–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vohs, K. D., Heatherton, T. F., & Herrin, M. (2001). Disordered eating and the transition to college: A prospective study. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 29, 280–288.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wertheim, E. H., Mee, V., & Paxton, S. J. (1999). Relationships among adolescent girls’ eating behaviors and their parents’ weight-related attitudes and behaviors. Sex Roles, 41, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilcox, K., & Laird, J. D. (2000), The impact of media images of super-slender women on women’s self-esteem: Identification, social comparison, and self-perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yanovitzky, I., & Stryker, J. (2001). Mass media, social Norms, and health promotion efforts: A longitudinal study of media effects on youth binge drinking. Communication Research, 28, 208–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sung-Yeon Park
    • 1
  • Gi Woong Yun
    • 1
  • Jacqueline Hitchon McSweeney
    • 2
  • Albert C. Gunther
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of TelecommunicationsSchool of Communication Studies, Bowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Life Sciences CommunicationUniversity of Wisconsin—MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations