Sex Roles

, Volume 58, Issue 3–4, pp 208–221

The Importance of Community Context for Young Women’s Occupational Aspirations

Original Article

Abstract

The effects of community context on occupational aspirations are examined in a national sample of young women in high school in the USA in 1979 (n = 2,210). Multilevel statistical models indicate that young women living in counties with a lower divorce rate, a lower percentage of women working, and more people employed in the wholesale and retail industrial sector tended to be less likely to aspire to paid work than young women living in areas with a higher divorce rate, a higher percentage of women working, and fewer people employed in the wholesale and retail industrial sector. Community context does not affect the level of young women’s occupational aspirations as predicted by prior scholarship.

Keywords

Occupational aspirations Community context Women’s careers Hierarchical linear modeling 

References

  1. Armstrong, H., & Taylor, J. (1993). Regional economics. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  2. Astin, H. S. (1984). The meaning of work in women’s lives: A sociopsychological model of career choice and work behavior. The Counseling Psychologist, 12, 117–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barling, J. (1990). Employment, stress, and family functioning. London: Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  4. Bartik, T. J. (1996). The distributional effects of local labor demand and industrial mix: Estimates using individual panel data. Journal of Urban Economics, 40, 150–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beggs, J. J., & Villemez, W. J. (2001). Regional labor markets. In I. Berg & A. L. Kalleberg (Eds.), Sourcebook of labor markets: Evolving structures and processes (pp. 503–529). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  6. Belsley, D., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential observations and sources of collinearity. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Blake, J. (1989). Family size and achievement. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Boatwright, K. J., Egidio, R. K., Vibbert, S., Leafers, J., Paschiera, G., Spang, E., et al. (2003). Psychological predictors of college women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of College Student Development, 44, 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewster, K., & Padavic, I. (2000). Change in gender ideology, 1977–1996: The contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brueckner, J. K., Thisse, J.-F., & Zenou, Y. (2002). Local labor markets, job matching, and urban location. International Economic Review, 43, 155–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burkhauser, R. V., Duncan, G. J., Hauser, R., & Bernsten, R. (1990). Economic burdens of marital disruptions: A comparison of the United States and the Federal Republic of Germany. Review of Income and Wealth, 36, 425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Center for Human Resource Research (2002). NLSY79 codebook. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  14. Chalk, L. M., Meara, N. M., Day, J. D., & Davis, K. L. (2005). Occupational possible selves: Fears and aspirations of college women. Journal of Career Assessment, 13, 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cook, T. D., Church, M. B., Ajanaku, S., Shadish, W. R., Jr., Kim, J.-R., & Cohen, R. (1996). The development of occupational aspirations and expectations among inner-city boys. Child Development, 67, 3368–3385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Correll, S. J. (2004). Constraints into preferences: Gender, status, and emerging career aspirations. American Sociological Review, 69, 93–113.Google Scholar
  18. DiPrete, T. A., & Forristal, J. D. (1994). Multilevel models: Methods and substance. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downey, D. B. (2001). Number of siblings and intellectual development. American Psychologist, 56, 497–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan, G., & Hoffman, S. (1985). A reconsideration of the economic consequences of marital dissolution. Demography, 22, 485–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duncan, G., & Hoffman, S. (1988). What are the economic consequences of divorce? Demography, 25, 641–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. England, P., & Kilbourne, B. (1988). Occupational measures from the dictionary of occupational titles for 1980 census detailed occupations [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
  23. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can Education be Equalised? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–63). Oxford, UK: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gándara, P. (1995). Over the ivy walls: The educational mobility of low-income Chicanos. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gottfredson, L. S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gottfredson, L. S. (1996). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription and compromise. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career Choice and Development (pp. 179–232). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Gottfredson, L. S., & Lapan, R. T. (1997). Assessing the gender-based circumscription of occupational aspirations. Journal of Career Assessment, 5, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hofferth, S. L. (1980). Long term labor market effects of vocational education on young women. Education, sex equality and occupational stereotyping (pp. 115–136). Washington, DC: National Commission for Employment Policy.Google Scholar
  29. Hughes, G., & McCormick, B. (1994). Did migration in the 1980’s narrow the North–South divide? Economica, 61, 509–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, M. K., & Mortimer, J. T. (2000). Work–family orientations and attainments in the early life course. In T. L. Parcel & D. B. Cornfield (Eds.), Work and family: Research informing policy (pp. 215–248). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Johnson, M. K., Oesterle, S., & Mortimer, J. T. (2001). Adolescents’ anticipations of work–family conflict in a changing societal context. Advances in Life Course Research, 6, 223–261.Google Scholar
  32. Jones, J. A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1989). Women’s occupations and local labor markets: 1950 to 1980. Social Forces, 67, 666–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (2000). Contextual supports and barriers to career choice: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47, 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lerner, J. V. (1994). Working women and their families. California: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Lorence, J. (1992). Service sector growth and metropolitan occupational sex segregation. Work and Occupations, 19, 128–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lugaila, T. (1997). Marital status and living arrangements. (pp. 20–506). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office (Update Series).Google Scholar
  38. Markham, W., Macken, P. O., Bonjean, C. M., & Corder, J. (1983). A note on sex, geographic mobility, and career advancement. Social Forces, 61, 1138–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Markham, W., & Pleck, J. (1986). Sex and willingness to move for occupational advancement. Sociological Quarterly, 27, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McManus, P. A., & DiPrete, T. A. (2001). Losers and winners: The financial consequences of separation and divorce for men. American Sociological Review, 66, 246–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mortimer, J. T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Holmes, M., & Shanahan, M. J. (2002). The process of occupational decision making: Patterns during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 439–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Novack, L. L., & Novack, D. R. (1996). Being female in the eighties and nineties: Conflicts between new opportunities and traditional expectations among white, middle class, heterosexual college women. Sex Roles, 35, 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peterson, T., & Morgan, L. (1995). Separate and unequal: Occupation–establishment sex segregation and the sex wage gap. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 329–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Powell, B., & Steelman, L. C. (1989). The Liability of having brothers: Paying for college and the sex composition of the family. Sociology of Education, 62, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rainey, L. M., & Borders, L. D. (1997). Influential factors in career orientation and career aspiration of early adolescent girls. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44, 160–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Reynolds, J., & Pemberton, J. (2001). Rising college expectations among youth in the United States: A comparison of the 1979 and 1997 NLSY. The Journal of Human Resources, 36, 703–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reynolds, J., Stewart, M., Sischo, L., & MacDonald, R. (2006). Have adolescents become too ambitious? High school seniors’ educational and occupational plans, 1976 to 2000. Social Problems, 53, 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ridgeway, C. L., & Correll, S. J. (2004). Unpacking the gender system: A theoretical perspective on gender beliefs and social relations. Gender & Society, 18, 510–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosenfeld, R. (1978). Women’s intergenerational occupational mobility. American Sociological Review, 43, 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schoon, I. (2001). Teenage job aspirations and career attainment in adulthood: A 17-year follow-up study of teenagers who aspired to become scientists, health professionals, or engineers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schoon, I., & Parsons, S. (2002). Teenage aspirations for future careers and occupational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 262–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schulenberg, J., Vondracek, F. W., & Crouter, A. C. (1984). The influence of the family on vocational development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 10, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1975). Education, occupation, and earnings: Achievement in the early career. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  56. Shapiro, D., & Crowley, J. E. (1982). Aspirations and expectations of youth in the United States, part 2: employment activity. Youth and Society, 14, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shu, X., & Marini, M. M. (1998). Gender-related change in occupational aspirations. Sociology of Education, 71, 44–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Spain, D., & Bianchi, S. M. (1996). Balancing act: Motherhood, marriage, and employment among American women. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  60. Stringer, D., & Duncan, E. (1985). Nontraditional occupations: A study of women who have made the choice. Vocational Guidance Quarterly, 33, 241–248.Google Scholar
  61. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2000. American Sociological Review, 71, 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Topel, R. H. (1986). Local labor markets. Journal of Political Economy, 94, S111–S143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. U.S. Census Bureau (2007). Industry by sex and median earnings in the past 12 months (In 2004 inflation-adjusted dollars) for the civilian employed population 16 years and over. Retrieved 13 April 2007 from http://www.factfinder.census.gov..
  64. Weeden, K., & Sorensen, J. B. (2004). A framework for analyzing industrial and occupational sex segregation in the United States. In M. Charles & D. B. Grusky (Eds.), Occupational ghettos: The worldwide segregation of women and men (pp. 245–296). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Weeks, M. O., Wise, G. W., & Duncan, C. (1984). The relationship between sex-role attitudes and career orientations of high school females and their mothers. Adolescence, 75, 595–607.Google Scholar
  66. Williams, L. S. (2002). The prophecy of place: A labor market study of young women and education. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61, 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1997). Modeling the sex-typing of occupational choice. Sociological Methods and Research, 26, 233–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yount, K. (1986). A theory of productive activity: The relationships among self-concept, gender, sex role stereotypes, and work-emergent traits. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 10, 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zuckerman, D. M. (1981). Family background, sex-role attitudes, and life goals of technical college and university students. Sex Roles, 7, 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of Texas at ArlingtonArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations