Sex Roles

, Volume 56, Issue 11–12, pp 729–739 | Cite as

Television Viewing and Rape Myth Acceptance among College Women

Original Article

Abstract

Prior research has shown that people who consume pornographic movies and magazines are more likely to accept rape myths. The results of the present study build on that research to link the acceptance of rape myths to general, daily television use among college women. Furthermore, our data show that college women who watch more television are more likely to believe that rape accusations are false. In addition, the data support a positive relationship between conservative political ideology and rape myth acceptance. However, the data do not support the cultivation hypothesis; that is, television use did not correlate with the overestimation of rape in society. The results suggest the need for additional research focused on the role that general television viewing may play in perpetuating rape-related misperceptions.

Keywords

Television viewing Rape perceptions Rape myth acceptance Cultivation Sexual assault 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors thank Laura Prividera, Kurt Neuwirth, the anonymous reviewers, and Joan Chrisler for comments on earlier drafts of this article.

References

  1. Allen, M., Emmers, T., Gebhardt, L., & Giery, M. A. (1995). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Communication, 45, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, C. A., Berkowitz, L., Donnerstein, E., Huesmann, L. R., Johnson, J. D., Linz, D., et al. (2003). The influence of media violence on youth. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 4, 81–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, G. B., Neuendorf, K. A., & Brentar, J. E. (1992). TV entertainment, news, and racial perceptions of college students. Journal of Communication, 42, 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1994). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 61–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Biek, M., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 547–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brady, E. C., Chrisler, J. C., Hosdale, D. C., Osowiecki, D. M., & Veal, T. A. (1991). Date rape: Expectations, avoidance strategies, and attitudes toward victims. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 427–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brinson, S. L. (1992). TV rape: Television’s communication of cultural attitudes toward rape. Women’s Studies in Communication, 12(2), 23–36.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 217–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Check, J. V. P., & Malamuth, N. M. (1983). Sex-role stereotyping and reactions to depictions of stranger versus acquaintance rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuklanz, L. M. (1998). The masculine ideal: Rape on prime-time television, 1976–1978. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 15, 423–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cuklanz, L. M. (1999). Rape on prime time: Television, masculinity, and sexual violence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dull, R. T., & Giacopassi, D. J. (1987). Demographic correlates of sexual and dating attitudes: A study of date rape. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Field, H. S. (1978). Attitudes toward rape: A comparative analysis of police, rapists, crisis counselors, and citizens. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 156–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, G. J. (1987). Hispanic and majority student attitudes toward forcible date rape as a function of differences in attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 17, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher, B., Cullen, F., & Turner, M. (2001). The sexual victimization of college women (DOJ Publication No. NCJ 182369). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/nij/182369.txt.Google Scholar
  16. Gerbner, G. (1969). Toward “cultural indicators”: The analysis of mass mediated message systems. AV Communication Review, 17, 137–148.Google Scholar
  17. Gerbner, G. (1998). Cultivation analysis: An overview. Mass Communication and Society, 1, 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerbner, G., & Gross, L. (1976). Living with television: The violence profile. Journal of Communication, 26, 173–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1994). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 91–122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Gilmartin-Zena, P. (1987). Attitudes toward rape: Student characteristics as predictors. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 15, 175–182.Google Scholar
  21. Gray, N. B., Palileo, G. J., & Johnson, G. D. (1993). Explaining rape victim blame: A test of attribution theory. Sociological Spectrum, 13, 377–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grayson, C. E., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Beliefs influence information processing strategies: Declarative and experiential information in risk assessment. Social Cognition, 17(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  23. Greenberg, B. S., & Busselle, R. W. (1996). Soap operas and sexual activity: A decade later. Journal of Communication, 46, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenberg, B. S., & Hofschire, L. (2000). The content and effects of sex on entertainment television. In D. Zillmann & P. Voderer (Eds.), Media entertainment: The psychology of its appeal (pp. 93–112). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  25. Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1981). Uniform messages and habitual viewing: Unnecessary assumptions in social reality effects. Human Communication Research, 7, 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hawkins, R., & Pingree, S. (1982). Television’s influence on social reality. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet, & J. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific progress and implications for the 80s: Volume II, technical reviews (pp. 224–247). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.Google Scholar
  27. Hawkins, R., Pingree, S., Hitchon, J., Gorham, B., Kannaovakun, P., Kahlor, L., et al. (2001). Predicting selection and activity in television genre viewing. Media Psychology, 3, 237–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Holbert, R. L., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Political implications of prime-time drama and sitcom use: Genres of representation and opinions concerning women’s rights. Journal of Communication, 53, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes, M. (1980). The fruits of cultivation analysis: A reexamination of some effects of television watching. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 287–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaukinen, C. E. (2004). The help-seeking strategies of female violent-crime victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 967–990.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, vol. 15 (pp. 192–238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  32. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Pienam.Google Scholar
  33. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lonsway, K. (1996). Preventing acquaintance rape through education: What do we know? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 229–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1994). Rape myths: In review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Malamuth, N. M. (1986). Predictors of naturalistic sexual aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 953–962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2001). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.Google Scholar
  38. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1981). The effects of mass media exposure on acceptance of violence against women: A field experiment. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 436–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1983). Sexual arousal to rape depictions: Individual differences. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 92, 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1984). Debriefing effectiveness following exposure to pornographic rape depictions. Journal of Sex Research, 20, 1–13.Google Scholar
  41. Malamuth, N. M., & Check, J. V. P. (1985). The effects of aggressive pornography on beliefs in rape myths: Individual differences. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Markova, I., & Power, K. (1992). Audience response to health messages about AIDS. In T. Edgar, M. A. Fitzpatrick, & V. Freimuth (Eds.), AIDS: A communication perspective (pp. 111–130). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Mayerson, S. E., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The effects of rape myth pornography on women’s attitudes and the mediating role of sex role stereotyping. Sex Roles, 17, 321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morgan, M. (1982). Television and adolescents’ sex-role stereotypes: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 947–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan, M., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Two decades of cultivation research: An appraisal and a meta-analysis. In B. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook, vol. 20 (pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Murphy, S. T., Monohan, J. L., & Miller, L. C. (1998). Inference under the influence: The impact of alcohol and inhibition conflict on women’s sexual decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 517–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagel, B., Matsuo, H., McIntyre, K. P., & Morrison, N. (2005). Attitudes towards victims of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 725–737.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. National Institute of Justice. (2004). Violence against women: Identifying risk factors (DOJ Publication No. NCJ 197019). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/197019.pdf.Google Scholar
  49. Nisbett, R. E., Borgida, E., Crandall, R., & Reed, H. (1982). Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 101–116). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Nurius, P. S., Norris, J., Dimeff, L. A., & Graham, T. L. (1996). Expectations regarding acquaintance sexual aggression among sorority and fraternity members. Sex Roles, 35, 427–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perse, E. M. (1994). Uses of erotica and acceptance or rape myths. Communication Research, 21, 488–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Potter, W. J. (1994). Cultivation theory and research: A methodological critique. Journalism Monographs, 147, 1–34.Google Scholar
  53. Potter, W. J., & Chang, I. C. (1990). Television exposure measures and the cultivation hypothesis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 34, 313–334.Google Scholar
  54. Romer, D., Hall-Jamieson, K., & Aday, S. (2003). Television news and the cultivation of fear of crime. Journal of Communication, 53, 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rozee, P., Bateman, P., & Gilmore, T. (1991). The personal perspective of acquaintance rape prevention: A three tier approach. In A. Parrott & L. Bechhofer (Eds.), Acquaintance rape: The hidden crime (pp. 337–354). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Rubin, A., Perse, E., & Taylor, D. (1988). A methodological examination of cultivation. Communication Research, 15, 107–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Russell, D. E. H. (1990). Rape in marriage. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  58. Shanahan, J., Morgan, M., & Madsen, N. (1997). Green or brown? Television and the cultivation of environmental concern. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 41, 305–323.Google Scholar
  59. Signorielli, N. (1989). Television and conceptions about sex-roles: Maintaining conventionality and the status quo. Sex Roles, 21, 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Signorielli, N. (1991). Adolescents and ambivalence towards marriage: A cultivation analysis. Youth & Society, 23, 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Signorielli, N. (2004). Aging on television: Messages relating to gender, race, and occupation in prime time. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48, 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Signorielli, N., Gerbner, G., & Morgan, M. (1995). Violence on television: The cultural indicators project. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 278–283.Google Scholar
  63. Signorielli, N., & Lears, M. (1992). Children, television, and conceptions about chores: Attitudes and behaviors. Sex Roles, 27, 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1996). Cultivation analysis—Research and practice. In M. B. Salwen & D. W. Stacks Jr. (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 111–126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Stockdale, J., Dockrell, J., & Wells, A. (1989). The self in relation to mass media representations of HIV and AIDS: Match or mismatch? Health Education Journal, 48, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the prevalence, incidence, and consequences of violence against women: Findings from the national violence against women survey (DOJ Publication No. NCJ183781). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice. Retrieved on February 9, 2006, from http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles1/nij/183781.txt.Google Scholar
  67. US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2003, September). Medical examination and treatment for victims of sexual assault: Evidence-based clinical practice and provider training (AHRQ Publication No. 03-R210). Rockville, MD. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from http://www.ahrq.gov/research/victsexual/.
  68. US Department of Justice. (2003). Criminal victimization 2002 (DOJ Publication No. NCJ 199994). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved February 9, 2006, from www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/cv02.pdf.
  69. Ward, S. K. (1994). Acquaintance and date rape: An annotated bibliography. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  70. Wyatt, G. E. (1990). The aftermath of child sexual abuse of African American women: The victim’s experience. Journal of Family Violence, 5, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wyatt, G. E. (1992). The sociocultural context of African American and White women’s rape. Journal of Social Issues, 48, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32, 10–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Advertising and Public RelationsUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.School of Journalism and CommunicationUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations