Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 56, Issue 9–10, pp 651–659 | Cite as

Good-bye, Mr. Chips: Male Teacher Shortages and Boys’ Reading Achievement

  • Laura Sokal
  • Herb Katz
  • Les Chaszewski
  • Cecilia Wojcik
Original Article

Abstract

One hundred seventy-five third- and fourth-grade boys who were identified as struggling readers participated in a 10-week intervention to determine the effect of the reading teachers’ sex on boys’ reading performance, self-perceptions as readers, and view of reading as a masculine, feminine, or gender-neutral activity. Findings indicated no main effects on reading performance, yet main effects of teacher’s sex on two sub-scales of reader self-perception emerged. Evidence of interactions showed that boys responded differentially to the intervention—they responded better to female teachers. Further analysis revealed that the boys’ responses varied as much as a response to individual male teachers as to the teacher’s sex.

Keywords

Reading Male teachers Gender 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We wish to acknowledge those people who contributed to this research: the classroom teachers and resource teachers, the student research assistants at the University of Winnipeg, and the boys and their families. We appreciate your dedication to this work.

References

  1. A good man is hard to find (2004, March 12). Fewer than one in three teachers male. Sydney: Daily Telegraph.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  3. Alberta Education (1986). Alberta diagnostic reading program. Edmonton, Alberta: Alberta Education.Google Scholar
  4. Allan, J. (1993). Male elementary teachers: Experiences and perspectives. In C. Williams (Ed.), Doing “woman’s work”: Men in non-traditional occupations (pp. 113–127). CA: Sage, Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  5. Baron, J. (1996). Sexism attitudes toward reading in the adult learner population (Report No. CS 012 410). Union, New Jersey: Kean College of New Jersey. (ERIC Reproduction Document No. ED393092)Google Scholar
  6. Basow, S. (1992). Gender stereotypes and roles. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  7. BBC News (2005, October 13). Call for male primary teachers. Accessed at http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/mpapps/pagetools/print/news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education.
  8. Brophy, J. E. (1985). Interactions of male and female students with male and female teachers. In L. Wilkinson & C. Marrett (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interactions (pp. 115–142). Cambridge, MA: Academic.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, D., & Christianson, R. (2003). Mixing and matching: The effect on student performance of teaching assistants of the same gender. Political Science and Politics, 36, 781–786.Google Scholar
  10. Carrington, B., & Skelton, C. (2003). Re-thinking role models: Equal opportunities in teacher recruitment in England and Wales. Journal of Educational Policy, 12, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrington, B., Tymms, P., & Merrell, C. (2005, August). Role models, school improvement and the ‘gender gap’—Do men bring out the best in boys and women the best in girls? Paper presented at the European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction conference. Cyprus: University of Nicosia.Google Scholar
  12. Connell, R. (1996). Teaching the boys: New research on masculinity, and gender strategies for schools. Teachers College Record, 98, 206–236.Google Scholar
  13. Coulter, R., & McNay, M. (1993). Exploring men’s experiences as elementary school teachers. Canadian Journal of Education, 18, 398–413.Google Scholar
  14. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (2001). Measuring up: the performance of Canada’s youth in reading, mathematics and science. The Oganization for Economic Co-operation and Development Programme for International Student Assessment study. Toronto: Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.Google Scholar
  15. Cummings, N. (1994). Eleventh graders view gender differences in reading and math. Journal of Reading, 38, 196–199.Google Scholar
  16. Dee, T. (2006). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. [National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper # 11660]. Available at http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/tdee1/Research/w11660revised.pdf.
  17. Delamont, S. (1990). Sex roles and the school. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Ehrenberg, R., Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1995). Do teachers’ race, gender and ethnicity matter? Evidence from the National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48, 547–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eng, J. (2004). Male elementary teachers: Where are they? Educational Insights, 8(3). Available: http://www.ccfi.educ.ubc.ca/publication/insights/v08n03/articles/eng.html.
  20. Freeman, C. (2004). Trends in educational equity of girls and women: 2004 [NCES 2005-016). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  21. Froude, L. (2002, March 8). Study defies the ‘boys need men’ credo. Times Educational Supplement, 4471, 3–9.Google Scholar
  22. Gambell, T., & Hunter, D. (2000). Surveying gender differences in Canadian school literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 689–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Golombok, S., & Fivush, R. (1994). Gender development. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Government of the UK (2000). The standards site: Gender and achievement [on-line]. Available: http://www.standards.dfee.gov.uk/genderandachievement/data_1.2.9.html.
  25. Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research: (pp. 403–422). Maywah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Henck, W., & Melnick, S. (1995). The Reader Self-Perception Scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470–482.Google Scholar
  27. Hermine, F. (1998). Gender differences in attitude toward reading in a sample of the Jewish community (Report no. CS 013 099). Union, New Jersey: Kean University. (ERIC Reproduction Document No. ED417378).Google Scholar
  28. Hetzner, A. (2003, March 17). As fewer men teach, educators bemoan loss of make models. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Available: http://nl.newsbank.com/nl-search/we/Archives?p_action=list&p_topdoc=5.
  29. Hoffert, S., & Sandberg, J. F. (2001). How American children spend their time. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Katz, H., & Sokal, L. (2003). Masculine literacy: One size does not fit all. Reading Manitoba, 24(1), 4–8.Google Scholar
  31. Klecker, B. (1997, November). Male elementary school teachers’ ratings of job satisfaction by years of teaching experience. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-south Educational Research Association, Memphis, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  32. Lewis, E., Butcher, J., & Donnan, P. (1999). Men in primary teaching: An endangered species? Australian Catholic University. Available: http://www.aare.edu.au/99pap/but99238.htm.
  33. Martin, C. L. (1993). New Directions for assessing children’s gender knowledge. Developmental Review, 13,184–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin, A. (2003). Primary school boys’ identity formation and the male role model: An exploration of sexual identity and gender identity in the UK through attachment theory. Sex Education, 3, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martin, A. (2005, November 6). Wanted: Male teachers for young students. Chicago Tribune News, p. 1.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, C. L., & Halverson, C. F. (1981). A schematic processing model of gender typing in children. Child Development, 52, 1119–1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martino, J., & Blye, F. (2006). The tyranny of surveillance: male teachers and the policing of masculinities in a single sex school. Gender and Education, 18(1), 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Martino, W., & Meyenn, B. (2002). ‘War, guns, and cool, tough things’: Interrogating single-sex classes as a strategy for engaging boys in English. Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 303–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKenna, E. (1997). Gender differences in reading attitudes. Unpublished master’s thesis, Kean College of New Jersey.Google Scholar
  40. Merrett, F., & Wheldall, K. (1992). Teachers’ use of praise and reprimands to boys and girls. Educational Review, 44(1), 73–79.Google Scholar
  41. Millard, E. (1997). Differently literate. London: Palmer Press.Google Scholar
  42. Mills, M., Martino, W., & Lingard, B. (2004). Attracting, recruiting, and retaining male teachers: Policy issues in the male teacher debate. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25, 355–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Kennedy, A. M. (2003). Program in International Reading Literacy Study 2001 International Report: Institute of Educational Sciences’ study of reading literacy achievement in primary schools. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar
  44. Northern Alberta Reading Specialists’ Council (1991).Paired Reading: A reading practice approach. Kelowna, British Columbia: Filmwest.Google Scholar
  45. Ontario Public School Boards’ Association (2000). Fast reports: Are schools failing boys? Ontario Provincial School Boards’ Association Fast Reports, 12(24). Available: http://www.opsba.org/pubs/fast/2000/00-09-15.html.
  46. Pottorff, D. D., Phelps-Zientarski, D., & Skovera, M. E. (1996). Gender perceptions of elementary and middle school students about literacy at school and at home. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 203–211.Google Scholar
  47. Sakhnandan, L., Lee, B., & Kelleher, S. (2000). An investigation into gender differences in achievement: phase 2—School and classroom strategies. London: National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  48. Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  49. Shapiro, D. (1980). Primary children’s attitudes toward reading in male and female teachers’ classrooms: An exploratory study. Journal of Reading Behavior, 12(3), 155–157.Google Scholar
  50. Simpson, A., & Erickson, M. (1983). Teachers’ verbal and nonverbal communication patterns as a function of teacher race, student gender, and student race. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Skelton, C. (2003). Male primary teachers and perceptions of masculinity. Educational Review, 55, 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sokal, L. (2005). Answering the question, “Which boys?” A new lens for viewing boys’ literacy scores. English Quarterly, 37(2), 36–41.Google Scholar
  53. Sokal, L., Katz, H., Adkins, M., Grills, T., Stewart, C., Priddle, G., et al. (2005). Factors affecting inner-city boys’ reading: Are male teachers the answer? Canadian Journal of Urban Research, 14, 107–130.Google Scholar
  54. Sokal, L., Monette, J., McBey, S., & Wojcik, C. (2006, April). Factors affecting boys’ reading gains. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  55. Stake, J., & Katz, J. (1982). Teacher–pupil relationships in the elementary school classroom: Teacher-gender and pupil-gender differences. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 465–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Statistics Canada (2003). Education indicators in Canada (3rd ed.). Publication Number 81-852-XPE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada, November 25.Google Scholar
  58. Tenenbaum, H. R., & Leaper, C. (2002). Are parents’ gender schemas related to their children’s gender-related cognitions? Developmental Psychology, 38, 615–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tinklin, T., Croxford, L., Duckiln, A., & Frame, B. (2001). Gender and pupil performance in Scotland’s schools. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Education Department.Google Scholar
  60. Topping, K. (1987). Paired Reading: A powerful technique for parent use. The Reading Teacher, 40, 608–614.Google Scholar
  61. Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find at school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Sokal
    • 1
  • Herb Katz
    • 2
  • Les Chaszewski
    • 1
  • Cecilia Wojcik
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of WinnipegWinnipegCanada
  2. 2.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations