Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 57, Issue 1–2, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Gender Role Beliefs and Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men in Chile and the U.S.

  • Angela J. Nierman
  • Suzanne C. Thompson
  • Angela Bryan
  • Amanda L. Mahaffey
Brief Report

Abstract

We compared the relationship between gender role beliefs and antigay prejudice in Chile and the United States. Participants were Chilean and American university students. In Study 1, Chileans were more prejudiced than Americans, and men were more prejudiced than women. In Study 2, gender role beliefs mediated cultural and sex differences in prejudice. Chileans held more traditional gender role beliefs and were more antigay than Americans. Men were more prejudiced than women, particularly in their attitudes toward gay men. Further, sex differences in attitudes toward lesbians and gay men were completely mediated by gender role beliefs. Nationality differences in attitudes toward lesbians were completely mediated, and nationality differences in attitudes toward gay men were partially mediated, by gender role beliefs.

Keywords

Gender roles Prejudice Cross-cultural Sex differences 

References

  1. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.Google Scholar
  2. Crandall, C. S., D’Anello, S., Sakallı, N., Lazarus, E., Nejtardt, G. W., & Feather, N. T. (2001). An attribution-value model of prejudice: Anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fiske, S. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination at the seam between the centuries: Evolution, culture, mind, and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fuller, N. (1998). Reflexiones sobre el machismo en América Latina [Reflections on machismo in Latin America]. In T. Valdés & J. Olavarría (Eds.), Masculinidades y Equidad de Género en América Latina (pp. 258–266). Santiago, Chile: FLACSO-Chile.Google Scholar
  5. Gentry, G. S. (1986). Development of scales measuring social distance toward male and female homosexuals. Journal of Homosexuality, 13(1), 75–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heine, S. J., Lehman, D. R., Peng, K., & Greenholtz, J. (2002). What’s wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales? The reference-group effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 903–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herek, G. M. (1987). Religious orientation and prejudice: A comparison of racial and sexual attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herek, G. M. (1993a). On heterosexual masculinity: Some psychical consequences of the social construction of gender and sexuality. In L. Garnets & D. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male experience (pp. 316–330). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Herek, G. M. (1993b). The context of antigay violence: Notes on cultural and psychological heterosexism. In L. Garnets & D. Kimmel (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on lesbian and gay male experiences (pp. 90–107). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Herek, G. M. (2000). Sexual prejudice and gender: Do heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men differ? Journal of Social Issues, 56, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herek, G. M. (2002). Gender gaps in public opinion about lesbians and gay men. Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 40–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kerr, P. S., & Holden, R. R. (1996). Development of the gender-role beliefs scale (GRBS). Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11(5), 3–16.Google Scholar
  14. Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., & Martin, C. E. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  15. Kite, M. E., & Deaux, K. (1987). Gender beliefs systems: Homosexuality and implicit inversion theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1996). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 336–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kite, M. E., & Whitley, B. E. (1998). Do heterosexual men and women differ in their attitudes toward homosexuality? A conceptual and methodological analysis. In G. M. Herek (Ed.), Stigma and sexual orientation: Understanding prejudice against lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals (pp. 39–61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques. Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 1–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sakallı, N. (2002). The relationship between sexism and attitudes toward homosexuality in a sample of Turkish college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 42(3), 53–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sears, J. T. (1998). The impact of culture and ideology on the construction of gender and sexual identities: Developing a critically based sexuality curriculum. In H.S. Shapiro & D.E. Purpel (Eds.), Critical social issues in American education: Transformation in a postmodern world (2nd ed., pp. 213–229). Mahwah, N. J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  21. Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological Methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.Google Scholar
  22. United Nations Human Development Report (2004). Human development indicators. Gender empowerment measure (GEM). Retrieved October 9, 2006 from http://hdr.undp.org/docs/statistics/indices/index_tables.pdf.
  23. United Nations Statistics Division (2005). Statistical databases. Statistics and indicators on women and men. Table 5f. Women administrative and managerial workers. Retrieved October 9, 2006 from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/indwm/ww2005/tab5f.htm.
  24. Weiner, B., Perry, R. P., & Magnusson, J. (1988). An attributional analysis of reactions to stigmas. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 738–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Whitley, B. E. (1990). The relationship of heterosexuals’ attributions for the causes of homosexuality to attitudes toward lesbians and gay men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 369–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitley, B. E. (2001). Gender-role variables and attitudes toward homosexuality. Sex Roles, 45, 691–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela J. Nierman
    • 1
    • 3
  • Suzanne C. Thompson
    • 1
  • Angela Bryan
    • 2
  • Amanda L. Mahaffey
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPomona CollegeClaremontUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Colorado at BoulderBoulderUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations