Sex Roles

, Volume 56, Issue 5–6, pp 265–273 | Cite as

Sexism, Hostility toward Women, and Endorsement of Beauty Ideals and Practices: Are Beauty Ideals Associated with Oppressive Beliefs?

  • Gordon B. Forbes
  • Linda L. Collinsworth
  • Rebecca L. Jobe
  • Kristen D. Braun
  • Leslie M. Wise
Original Article


Relationships between the endorsement of Western beauty ideals and practices and measures of hostility toward women and sexism were studied in 159 college men and 194 college women. The participants were predominately 18 or 19 years of age and of European American ethnicity. Correlations were computed between five factor analytically derived measures of beauty ideals and practices, two measures of the thin body ideal, and the following measures: Hostility toward Women Scale (HTWS; Lonsway & Fitzgerald, 1995), Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS; Spence & Helmreich, 1978), and the two subscales of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI; Glick & Fiske, 1996): hostile sexism (ASI-H) and benevolent sexism (ASI-B). It was found that endorsement of Western beauty ideals and practices was associated with hostility toward women, traditional sexism, hostile sexism, and, to a lesser extent, benevolent sexism. Results support feminist critiques of beauty practices as oppressive.


Beauty ideals Sexism Hostility toward women 



The authors are indebted to our colleagues in the Millikin University English Department whose generous support made this research possible. We also thank Jaehee Jung, Kelly Haas, and Jessica LeClaire for their assistance.


  1. Banner, L. (1983). American beauty. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  2. Bartky, S. L. (1990). Femininity and domination: Studies in the phenomenology of repression. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bordo, S. (1993). Unbearable weight: Feminism, western culture, and the body. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  6. Check, J. V. K., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. (1985). On hostile ground. Psychology Today, pp. 56–58, 60–61. (April)Google Scholar
  7. Dworkin, A. (1974). Woman hating. New York, Dutton.Google Scholar
  8. Etcoff, N. (1999). Survival of the prettiest: The science of beauty. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. H., Rade, B., & Jaberg, P. (2001). Body dissatisfaction in women and men: The role of gender-typing and self-esteem. Sex Roles, 44, 461–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., & White, K. B. (2004). First and second generation measures of sexism, rape myths and related beliefs, and hostility toward women: Their interrelationships and association with college students’ experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion. Violence Against Women, 10, 236–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garner, D. M., Garfinkel, P. E., Schwartz, D., & Thompson, M. (1980). Cultural expectations of thinness in women. Psychological Reports, 47, 483–491.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison, K. (2003). Television viewers’ ideal body proportions: The case of the curvaceously thin woman. Sex Roles, 48, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, L. (1992). Physical appearance and gender: Sociobiological and sociocultural perspectives. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jeffreys, S. (2005). Beauty and misogyny: Harmful cultural practices in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Lehrman, K. (1997). The lipstick proviso. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  19. Lonsway, K. A., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical reexamination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. H. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ogden, C. L., Fryar, C. D., Carroll, M. D., & Flegal, K. M. (2004). Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960–2002. [Advance data from vital and health statistics; no. 347.] Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  22. Rodin, J., Silberstein, L. R., & Striegel-Moore, R. H. (1984). Women and weight: A normative discontent. In T. B. Sonderegger (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol 32. Psychology and gender (pp. 267–307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  23. Rozin, P. & Fallon, A. (1988). Body image, attitudes toward weight, and misperceptions of figure preferences of the opposite sex: A comparison of men and women in two generations. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 97, 342–345.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scott, B. A. (1997). Beauty myth beliefs: Theory, measurement, and the use of a new construct. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, 1997). Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 58, 459.Google Scholar
  25. Spence, J. T. (1998). Commentary. Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes: A work in progress. [Commentary.] Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 353–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1972). The attitudes toward women scale: An objective instrument to measure the attitudes toward the rights and roles of women in contemporary society. JSAS: Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 2, 66–67 (Ms. No. 153).Google Scholar
  27. Spence, J. T., & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  28. Stunkard, A. J., Sorenson, T., & Schulsinger, F. (1983). Use of the Danish adoption register for the study of obesity and thinness. In S. Kety, L. P. Rowland, R. L. Sidman, & S. W. Matthysse (Eds.), The genetics of neurological and psychiatric disorders (pp. 115–120). New York: Raven.Google Scholar
  29. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gordon B. Forbes
    • 1
    • 3
  • Linda L. Collinsworth
    • 1
  • Rebecca L. Jobe
    • 2
  • Kristen D. Braun
    • 1
  • Leslie M. Wise
    • 1
  1. 1.Millikin UniversityDecaturUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyWalden UniversityMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Rio RanchoUSA

Personalised recommendations