Parent’s Social Support for Children’s Outdoor Physical Activity: Do Weekdays and Weekends Matter?
- 937 Downloads
In this study we examined the relationships among parental social supportive behaviors for children’s weekday and weekend outdoor physical activity (OPA). Thirty-nine girls and 29 boys 8 to 11 years wore pedometers for 7 days. Sixty-five mothers and 50 fathers responded to a social support questionnaire about OPA that was comprised of four dimensions: encouragement, playing with, use of activity as family recreation, and watch. After controlling for age and sport participation, regression analyses indicated that mothers’ use of activity as recreation was positively associated with girls’ weekday OPA. On the weekend, fathers’ play with son was positively related to OPA. The effectiveness of family-based activity interventions depends on when parents have opportunities to be present for their child’s activity and gender differences in the support provided.
KeywordsPedometer Family Children Health-related parenting practices
We would like to extend our appreciation to the children and parents who made this study possible. Further, we would like to recognize the school administrators who graciously allowed us into their school. We could not have accomplished our work without all of their assistance.
- Brustad, R. J. (1993). Who will go out and play? Parental and psychological influences on children’s attraction to physical activity. Pediatric Exercise Science, 5, 210–223.Google Scholar
- Christiansen, S. L., & Palkovitz, R. (2001). Why the “Good Provider” role still matters: Providing as a form of paternal involvement. Journal of Family Issues, 22(1), 84–106.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Harrold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: Applying the Eccle’s expectancy value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7–35.Google Scholar
- Fagot, B. L. (1994). Peer relations and the development of competence in boys and girls. In C. Leaper (Ed.), Childhood segregation: Causes and consequences (pp. 53–66). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2005). Family socialization, gender, and sport motivation and involvement. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 27, 3–31.Google Scholar
- Hewlett, B. S. (2003). Fathers in forager, farmer, and pastoral cultures. In M. E. Lamb (Ed.), The role of fathers in child development (pp. 182–195). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A., & Machung, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Le Masurier, G. C., Beighle, A., Corbin, C. B., Darst, P. W., Morgan, C., Pangrazi, R. P., et al. (2005). Pedometer-determined physical activity levels of youth. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 2(2), 159–168.Google Scholar
- O’Loughlin, J., Paradis, G., Kishchuk, N., Barnett, T., & Renaud, L. (1999). Prevalence and correlates of physical activity behaviors among elementary schoolchildren in multiethnic, low income, inner-city neighborhoods in Montreal, Canada. Annals of Epidemiology, 9(7), 397–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perry, C. L., Crockett, S. J., & Pirie, P. (1987). Influencing parental health behavior: Implications of community assessments. Health Education, 18(5), 68–77.Google Scholar
- Raudsepp, L., & Viira, R. (2000). Influence of parents’ and siblings’ physical activity on activity levels of adolescents. European Journal of Physical Education, 5(2), 169–178.Google Scholar
- Roberts, C. (2005). Cooking with kids—Safely!—Cooking-tips: URL http://www.free-health-information.com/cooking-tips/40491.shtml.
- Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputations of missing values. Stata Journal, 4(3), 227–241.Google Scholar
- US Census Bureau (2000). American factfinder. Retrieved 10-18-04.Google Scholar