Sex Roles

, Volume 55, Issue 9–10, pp 693–702

College Men, Their Magazines, and Sex

Original Article

Abstract

Relations between reading Lad magazines and pornographic magazines and the beliefs and attitudes that are consistent with their content were explored in two independent surveys of college undergraduate men (n = 91 and 68, respectively). The impact of reading such magazines on men’s sexual self-schema was also examined. The results indicated a relationship between reading Lad magazines and endorsement of permissive sexual attitudes independent of actual sexual behavior. Reading Lad magazines was also associated with expectations of greater sexual variety and a more aggressive sexual self-schema. Reading pornographic magazines was found to be associated with permissive attitudes. Neither reading pornographic magazines nor reading lad magazines was related to aggressive attitudes.

Keywords

College men Lad magazines Pornographic magazines Sexual attitudes 

References

  1. Allen, M., D’Alessio, D., & Brezgel, K. (1995). A meta-analysis summarizing the effects of pornography: II. Aggression after exposure. Human Communication Research, 22(2), 258–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, M., Emmers, T., Gebhardt, L., & Giery, M. A. (1995). Exposure to pornography and acceptance of rape myths. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althusser, L. (1987). Lenin and philosophy. (B. Brewster, Trans.). London, UK: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D. (1999). Men’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 645–661.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andre, T., Dietsch, C., & Cheng, Y. (1991). Sources of sex education as a function of sex, coital activity, and type of information. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16, 215–240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aubrey, J. S., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety versus timing: Gender differences in college students’ sexual expectations as predicted by exposure to sexually oriented television. Communication Research, 30(4), 432–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beggan, J. K., & Allison, S. T. (2001). What do Playboy playmates want? Implications of expressed preferences in the construction of the “unfinished” masculine identity. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 10(1), 1–38.Google Scholar
  8. Beggan, J. K., & Allison, S. T. (2003). “What sort of man reads Playboy?”: The self-reported influence of Playboy on the construction of masculinity. Journal of Men’s Studies, 11(2), 189–206.Google Scholar
  9. Berger, J. (1972). Ways of seeing. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  10. Buerkel-Rothfuss, N. L., & Strouse, J. S. (1997). Media exposure and perceptions of sexual behaviors: The cultivation hypothesis moves to the bedroom. In B. S. Greenberg, J. D. Brown, & N. L. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.), Media, sex and the adolescent (pp. 225–247). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217–230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calfin, M. S., Carroll, J. L., & Shmidt, J. (1993). Viewing music videotapes before taking a test of premarital sexual attitudes. Psychological Reports, 72, 475–481.Google Scholar
  13. Davis, C. M., & Bauserman, R. (1993). Exposure to sexually explicit materials: An attitude change perspective. Annual Review of Sex Research, 4, 121–209.Google Scholar
  14. DeLameter, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality: Theories and research (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dietz, P. E., & Evans, B. (1982). Pornographic imagery and prevalence of paraphilia. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 139(11), 1493–1495.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  17. Huesmann, L. R. (1997). Observational learning of violent behavior: Social and biosocial processes. In A. Raine (Ed.), Biosocial bases of violence (pp. 69–88). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Huston, A. C., Wartella, E., & Donnerstein, E. (1998). Measuring the effects of sexual content in the media: A report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Jones, M. E., Russell, R. L., & Bryant, F. B. (1998). The structure of rape attitudes for men and women: A three-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karges, K. (Ed.) (2005). Gale directory of publications and broadcast media: An annual guide to publications and broadcasting stations (140th ed.). Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale.Google Scholar
  21. Lanis, K., & Covell, K. (1995). Images of women in advertisements: Effects on attitudes related to sexual aggression. Sex Roles, 32(9/10), 639–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MacKay, N. J., & Covell, K. (1997). The impact of women in advertisements on attitudes toward women. Sex Roles, 36(9/10), 573–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Malamuth, N. M. (1998). The confluence model as an organizing framework for research on sexually aggressive men: Risk moderators, imagined aggression, and pornography consumption. In R. G. Geen & E. Donnerstein (Eds.), Human aggression: Theories, research, and implications for social policy (pp. 229–245). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Malamuth, N. M., Addison, T., & Koss, M. (2000). Pornography and sexual aggression: Are there reliable effects and can we understand them? Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 26–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Malamuth, N. M., & McIlwraith, R. D. (1988). Fantasies and exposure to sexually explicit magazines. Communication Research, 15(6), 753–771.Google Scholar
  26. Matacin, M. L., & Burger, J. M. (1987). A content analysis of sexual themes in Playboy cartoons. Sex Roles, 17(3/4), 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Myers, P. N., & Biocca, F. A. (1992). The elastic body image: The effect of television advertising and programming on body image distortions in young women. Journal of Communication, 42(3), 108–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sampson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 870–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sprecher, S. (1998). Premarital sexual permissiveness scale. In C. Davis (Ed.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures (pp. 499–500). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Taylor, L. D. (2005a). All for him: Articles about sex in American lad magazines. Sex Roles, 52(3/4), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, L. D. (2005b). Effects of visual and verbal sexual television content and perceived realism on attitudes and beliefs. The Journal of Sex Research, 42(2), 130–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zillmann, D., & Bryant, J. (1982). Pornography, sexual callousness, and the trivialization of rape. Journal of Communication, 32(4), 10–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationUniversity of California, DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations