Sex Roles

, Volume 55, Issue 9–10, pp 621–632 | Cite as

Living the Image: A Quantitative Approach to Delineating Masculinities

Original Article

Abstract

Authors have repeatedly argued that a nearly exclusive focus on the dominant form of masculinity limits our knowledge of masculinity. Qualitative masculinities researchers have revealed multiple masculine forms, but quantitative researchers have not yet assessed them. This study adopted a social identity approach to examine endorsement of ten typically male images (Average Joe, Businessman, Family Man, Jock, Nerd, Player, Rebel, Sensitive New-Age Guy, Stud, Tough Guy) and their connections to gender norms and traits. Data from 340 male and 348 female adults revealed that identification with each image was related to a particular pattern of norm conformity and trait endorsement. Patterns varied by sex. Findings suggested that distinctions across images may be assessed quantitatively. Implications for quantitative research on masculinities were discussed.

Keywords

Masculinity Gender roles Stereotypes Social identity Gender differences 

References

  1. Ashmore, R. D., Del Boca, F. K., & Beebe, M. (2002). “Alkie,” “Frat Brother,” and “Jock”: Perceived types of college students and stereotypes about drinking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 885–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. L., Eccles, J. S., & Stone, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the princess? Young adult pathways linked to adolescent activity involvement and social identity. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 429–455.Google Scholar
  3. Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., & Bourguignon, D. (2003). We are one and I like it: The impact of ingroup entitativity on ingroup identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 735–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. David, D. & Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint for manhood and what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1–48). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  6. Deutsch, F. M. & Saxon, S. E. (1998). Traditional ideologies, nontraditional lives. Sex Roles, 38, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eccles, J. S. & Barber, B. L. (1999). Student council, volunteering, basketball, or marching band: What kind of extracurricular involvement matters? Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 10–43.Google Scholar
  8. Eckes, T. (1994). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37–60.Google Scholar
  9. Edwards, G. H. (1992). The structure and content of the male gender role stereotype: An exploration of subtypes. Sex Roles, 27, 533–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faludi, S. (1999). Stiffed: The betrayal of the American man. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  11. Gilmore, D. D. (1990). Manhood in the making: Cultural concepts of masculinity. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Good, G. E., Thomson, D. A., & Brathwaite, A. D. (2005). Men and therapy: Critical concepts, theoretical frameworks, and research recommendations. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61, 699–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, R. J. & Ashmore, R. D. (1998). Taking and developing pictures in the head: Assessing the physical stereotypes of eight gender types. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 1609–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hammond, W. P., & Mattis, J. S. (2005). Being a man about it: Manhood meaning among African American men. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 6, 114–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hare-Mustin, R. T. & Marecek, J. (1990). On making a difference. In R. T. Hare-Mustin & J. Marecek (Eds.), Making a difference: Psychology and the construction of gender (pp. 1–21). New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kashima, Y., Kashima, E., Chiu, C.-Y., Farsides, T., Gelfand, M., Hong, Y.-Y., et al. (2005). Culture, essentialism, and agency: Are individuals universally believed to be more real entities than groups? European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 147–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kimmel, M. (1996). Manhood in America: A cultural history. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  19. Klapp, O. E. (1962). Heroes, villains and fools: Reflections of the American character. San Diego, CA: Aegis.Google Scholar
  20. Levant, R. F. (1996). The new psychology of men. Professional Psychology, Research and Practice, 27, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levant, R. F., Richmond, K., Majors, R. G., Inclan, J. E., Rossello, J. M., Heesacker, M., et al. (2003). A multicultural investigation of masculinity ideology and alexithymia. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 4, 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). The seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  23. Madon, S. (1997). What do people believe about gay males? A study of stereotype content and strength. Sex Roles, 37, 663–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mahalik, J. R., Locke, B. D., Ludlow, L. H., Diemer, M. A., Scott, R. P. J., Gottfried, M., et al. (2003). Development of the conformity to masculine norms inventory. Journal of Men & Masculinity, 4, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahalik, J. R., Morray, E. B., Coonerty-Femiano, A., Ludlow, L. H., Slattery, S. M., & Smiler, A. P. (2005). Development of the conformity to feminine norms inventory. Sex Roles, 52, 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCreary, D. R., Newcomb, M. D., & Sadava, S. W. (1998). Dimensions of the male gender role: A confirmatory analysis in men and women. Sex Roles, 39, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Messner, M. A. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
  28. Morawski, J. G. (1985). The measurement of masculinity and femininity: Engendering categorical realities. Journal of Personality, 53, 196–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pecora, N. (1992). Superman/superboys/supermen: The comic book hero as socializing agent. In S. Craig (Ed.), Men, masculinity and the media (pp. 61–77). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  31. Pleck, J. H., Sonenstein, F. L., & Ku, L. C. (1994). Attitudes toward male roles: A discriminant validity analysis. Sex Roles, 30, 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pope, H. G., Jr., Olivardia, R., Gruber, A., & Borowiecki, J. (1999). Evolving ideals of male body image as seen through action toys. Eating Disorders, 26, 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sinn, J. S. (1997). The predictive and discriminant validity of masculinity ideology. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smiler, A. P. (2004). Thirty years after gender: Concepts and measures of masculinity. Sex Roles, 50, 15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smiler, A. P. (2006). Conforming to masculine norms: Evidence for validity among non-undergraduates and women. Sex Roles (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Spence, J. T. & Helmreich, R. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates and antecedents. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  37. Stone, M. R., Barber, B. L., & Eccles, J. S. (2001). Adolescent “crowd” clusters: An adolescent perspective on persons and patterns. Paper presented at the Society for Research on Child Development, Minneapolis, MN (April).Google Scholar
  38. Taylor, N. & McGarty, C. (2001). The role of subjective group memberships and perceptions of power in industrial conflict. Journal of community and applied social psychology, 11, 389–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Terman, L. M. & Miles, C. C. (1936). Sex and personality: Studies in masculinity and femininity. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. Thoits, P. A. & Virshup, L. K. (1997). Me’s and we’s: Forms and functions of social identities. In R. D. Ashmore & L. Jussim (Eds.), Self and identity: Fundamental issues (pp. 106–133). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Turner, J. C. (1999). Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In N. Ellemers, R. Spears & B. Doosje (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 6–34). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  42. Turner, J. C., Brown, R. J., & Tajfel, H. (1979). Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9, 187–204.Google Scholar
  43. Wetherell, M. & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wheeler, S. C. & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: A review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yzerbyt, V. & Rocher, S. (2002). Subjective essentialism and the emergence of stereotypes. In C. McGarty, V. Yzerbyt & R. Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of meaningful beliefs about social groups (pp. 38–66). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologySUNY OswegoOswegoUSA

Personalised recommendations