Sex Roles

, Volume 55, Issue 3–4, pp 187–195 | Cite as

Upsetting Behavior: Reactions to Personal and Bystander Sexual Harassment Experiences

  • Robert T. Hitlan
  • Kimberly T. Schneider
  • Benjamin M. Walsh
Original Article


The current research was designed to examine objective and contextual factors related to the appraisal of potentially sexually harassing situations. Working female participants (n = 208) from a mid-sized southwestern university completed a workplace experiences survey in small groups. The majority of participants were Hispanic/Latina (77.9%). We predicted that characteristics of personal harassment experiences (e.g., number of distinct types of behaviors experienced, frequency, duration) and bystander harassment experiences would contribute independently to how upset women were by their own sexual harassment experiences. Results indicated that characteristics of personal harassment experiences and bystander experiences did predict how upset women were by their own gender harassment and by unwanted sexual attention experiences. Results are discussed in terms of the importance of considering multiple types of workplace stressors (e.g., personal and bystander sexual harassment experiences) and their relation to the appraisal process.


Sexual harassment Bystander harassment Appraisal Workplace stress 


  1. Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (Un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology, vol. 2 (4th ed., pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152–174). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (1980). Guidelines on discrimination because of sex (Sect. 1604.11). Federal Register, 45, 74676–74677.Google Scholar
  6. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). (1990, March 19). Policy guidance no. N-915-050: Current issues of sexual harassment. Washington, District of Columbia.Google Scholar
  7. Feldman, D. C., Doerpinghaus, H. I., & Turnley, W. H. (1994). Managing temporary workers: A permanent HRM challenge. Organizational Dynamics, 23, 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fitzgerald, L. F., & Hesson-McInnis, M. (1989). The dimensions of sexual harassment: A structural analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35, 309–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Magley, V. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5–28). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  13. Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glomb, T. M., Munson, L. J., Hulin, C. L., Bergman, M. E., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 14–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gruber, J. E., & Bjorn, L. (1982). Blue-collar blues: The sexual harassment of women autoworkers. Work and Occupations, 9, 271–298.Google Scholar
  16. Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Hesson-McInnis, M. S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 877–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56, 607–631.Google Scholar
  19. James, K., & Khoo, G. (1991). Identity-related influences on the success of minority workers in primarily nonminority organizations. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 13, 169–192.Google Scholar
  20. Judge, T. A. (1990). Job satisfaction as a reflection of disposition: Investigating the relationships and its effects on employee adaptive behaviors. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.Google Scholar
  21. Keashly, L., Trott, V., & MacLean, L. M. (1994). Abusive behavior in the workplace: A preliminary investigation. Violence and Victims, 9, 341–357.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kenig, S., & Ryan, J. (1986). Sex differences in levels of tolerance and attribution of blame for sexual harassment on a university campus. Sex Roles, 15, 535–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (Eds.) (1994). No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community. Washington, District of Columbia: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  24. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Lipari, R. N., & Lancaster, A. R. (2003). Armed forces 2002 sexual harassment survey [DMDC Report no. 2003-026]. Arlington, Virginia: Defense Manpower Data Center.Google Scholar
  26. Loy, P., & Stewart, L. P. (1984). The extent and effect of sexual harassment of working women. Sociological Focus, 17, 31–43.Google Scholar
  27. Morrow, P. C., McElroy, J. C., & Phillips, C. M. (1994). Sexual harassment behaviors and work related perceptions and attitudes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 295–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robinson v. Jacksonville Shipyards, Inc., 760 F. Supp. 1486 (M.D. Fla. 1991).Google Scholar
  29. Rogers, J. K., & Henson, K. D. (1997). “Hey, why don’t you wear a shorter skirt?: Structural vulnerability and the organization of sexual harassment in temporary clerical employment. Gender and Society, 11, 215–237.Google Scholar
  30. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914–922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider, K. T. (1996). Bystander stress: Effects of sexual harassment on victims’ co-workers. In J Schmidtke (Chair), Responses to sexual harassment. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, ON (August).Google Scholar
  32. Schneider, K. T., Hitlan, R. T., & Radhakrishnan, P. (2000). An examination of the nature and correlates of ethnic harassment experiences in multiple contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 3–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schneider, K. T., & Swan, S. (1994). Job-related, psychological, and health-related outcomes of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, Tennessee (April).Google Scholar
  34. Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, A., & Stewart, A. J. (1983). Approaches to studying racism and sexism in Black women’s lives. Journal of Social Issues, 39, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. US Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1988). Sexual harassment in the federal government: An update. Washington, District of Columbia: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  37. US Merit Systems Protection Board (USMSPB). (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Trends, progress, and continuing challenges. Washington, District of Columbia: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  38. Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989). Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity. Psychological Review, 96, 234–254.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Weitz, J. (1952). A neglected concept in the study of job satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 5, 201–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert T. Hitlan
    • 1
    • 3
  • Kimberly T. Schneider
    • 2
  • Benjamin M. Walsh
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA
  2. 2.Illinois State UniversityNormalUSA
  3. 3.University of Northern IowaCedar FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations