Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 55, Issue 3–4, pp 173–185 | Cite as

Images of Men and Women in Mobile Phone Advertisements: A Content Analysis of Advertisements for Mobile Communication Systems in Selected Popular Magazines

  • Nicola Döring
  • Sandra Pöschl
Original Article

Abstract

The present study was designed to analyze gender stereotypes in print advertisements for mobile communication systems in German popular magazines intended for men, women, and general readership. Depictions of both women and men are addressed. A total of 288 depictions were examined using Goffman’s (Gender advertisements, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1979) framework for content analysis. Other variables studied were the setting in which men and women are depicted and the different types of magazines in which the advertisements appeared. It is shown that certain means of emphasizing stereotypes (such as Feminine Touch) are still widely used, at least in mobile phone advertising, whereas others have decreased in frequency since Goffman’s time (for example, Function Ranking).

Keywords

Gender stereotypes Content analysis Print advertisements Technology 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Franziska Fellenberg for her contribution as a reliability coder.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2001). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.). Washington, District of Columbia: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  2. Becker, A. E., Burwell, R. A., Gilman, S. E., Herzog, D. B., & Hamburg, P. (2002). Eating behaviours and attitudes following prolonged exposure to television among ethnic Fijian adolescent girls. British Journal of Psychiatry, 180, 509–514.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Belknap, P., & Leonard, W. M. (1991). A Conceptual Replication and Extension of Erving Goffman’s Study of Gender Advertisements. Sex Roles, 25, 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, P., & Milic, M. (2002). Goffman’s gender advertisements revisited: Combining content analysis with semiotic analysis. Visual Communication, 1, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carter, C., & Steiner, L. (2004). Introduction to critical readings: Media and gender. In C. Carter & L. Steiner (Eds.), Critical readings: Media and gender (pp. 1–10). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Craig, S. (1992). Men’s men and women’s women: How TV commercials portray gender to different audiences. In R. Kemper (Ed.), Issues and effects of mass communication: Other voices (pp. 89–100). San Diego, California: Capstone.Google Scholar
  7. First, A. (1998). Nothing New Under the Sun? A Comparison of Images of Women in Israeli Advertisements in 1979 and 1994. Sex Roles, 38, 1065–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Furnham, A., & Mak, T. (1999). Sex-role stereotyping in television commercials: A review and comparison of 14 studies done on five continents over 25 years—statistical data included. Sex Roles, 41, 413–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Furnham, A., & Thomson, L. (1999). Gender role stereotyping in advertisements on two British radio stations. Sex Roles, 40, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher, M. (2004). The impact of monitoring media images of women. In C. Carter & L. Steiner (Eds.), Critical readings: Media and gender (pp. 148–161). Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ganahl, D. J., Prinsen, T. J., & Netzley, S. B. (2003). A content analysis of prime time commercials: A contextual framework of gender representation. Sex Roles, 49, 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerbner, G. & Gross, L. (1973). Cultural indicators: The social reality of television drama. Pennsylvania University, Philadelphia. Annenberg School of Communications.Google Scholar
  13. Goffmann, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Haddon, L. (2000, June). The social consequences of mobile telephony: Framing questions. Paper presented at the seminar ‘Sosiale Konsekvenser av Mobiltelefoni’ organised by Telenor, Oslo, Norway .Google Scholar
  15. Kang, M.-E. (1997). The portrayal of women’s images in magazine advertisements: Goffman’s gender analysis revisited. Sex Roles, 37, 979–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lavine, H., Sweeney, D., & Wagner, S. H. (1999). Depicting women as sex objects in television advertising: Effects on body dissatisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1049–1058.Google Scholar
  17. Lazier, L. & Kendrick, A. L. (1993). Women in Advertisements: Sizing up the Images, Roles and Functions. In P. J. Creedon (Ed.), Women in mass communication (pp. 199–219). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Lindner, K. (2004). Images of women in general interest and fashion magazine advertisements from 1955 to 2002. Sex Roles, 51, 409–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McLaughlin, T. L., & Goulet, N. (1999). Gender advertisements in magazines aimed at African Americans: A comparison to their occurrence in magazines aimed at Caucasians. Sex Roles, 40, 61–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Murtagh, G. M. (2002). Seeing the “rules”: Preliminary observations of action, interaction, and mobile phone use. In B. Brown (Ed.), Wireless world: Social and international aspects of the mobile age (pp. 81–91). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Neto, F., & Pinto, I. (1998). Gender stereotypes in Portuguese television advertisements. Sex Roles, 39, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research, & Evaluation, 9, Article 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media Design and Media Psychology, Institute for Media and Communication StudiesTechnische Universität IlmenauIlmenauGermany

Personalised recommendations