Sex Roles

, Volume 54, Issue 7–8, pp 575–583

The Role of Social Comparison and Body Consciousness in Women’s Hostility Toward Women

Original Paper

Abstract When confronted with images of attractive women, women who are hostile toward women (HTW) may demonstrate negative upward comparison, i.e., feel bad about themselves, or they may discount other women’s attractiveness. We examined the relations between women’s HTW and negative upward comparison, discounting, and body consciousness. The effect on HTW of viewing images of women also was examined. HTW was higher among those first exposed to the images than among those in a control condition. In general, analyses of the two conditions separately indicated that HTW was associated with devaluing the attractiveness of attractive and average-looking images, but not with negative upward comparison. In contrast to the association between HTW and discounting, body shame was consistently related to negative upward comparison, as well as to HTW.

Keywords

Hostility toward women Upward comparison Body consciousness 

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597–1611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blanton, H., Crocker, J., & Miller, D. T. (2000). The effects of in-group versus out-group social comparison on self-esteem in the context of a negative stereotype. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 519–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calogero, R. M. (2004). A test of objectification theory: The effect of the male gaze on appearance concerns in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caplan, P. (1981). Between women: Lowering the barriers. Toronto: Spectrum.Google Scholar
  5. Cashdan, E. (1998). Are men more competitive than women? British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 213–229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Check, J. V. P. (1988). Hostility toward women: Some theoretical considerations. In G. W. Russell (Ed.), Violence in intimate relationships (pp. 29–42). Great Neck, NY: PNA.Google Scholar
  7. Check, J. V. P., Malamuth, N. M., Elias, B., & Barton, S. A. (1985). On hostile ground. Psychology Today 56–61.Google Scholar
  8. Cowan, G., Neighbors, C., DeLaMoreaux, J., & Behnke, C. (1998). Women’s hostility toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowan, G., & Ullman, J. (2006). Ingroup rejection among women: The role of personal inadequacy. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  10. Crocker, J., & Luhtanen, R. (1990). Collective self-esteem and ingroup bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 60–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons, F. X., & Boney-McCoy, S. (1991). Self-esteem, similarity, and reactions to active versus passive downward comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 414–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gold, J. A., Thornton, B., & Audesse, R. J. (1999). Forms of competitive attitude and achievement in relation to disordered eating. Sex Roles, 40, 853–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grogan, S., Williams, Z., & Conner, M. (1996). The effects of viewing same-gender photographic models on body-esteem. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 569–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, K. (2001). Ourselves, our bodies: Thin-ideal media, self-discrepancies, and eating disorder symptomatology in adolescents. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 289–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, D. (2001). Social comparison and body image: Attractiveness comparisons to models and peers among adolescent girls and boys. Sex Roles, 45, 645–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kemmelmeier, M., & Oyserman, D. (2001). The ups and downs of thinking about a successful other: Self-construals and the consequences of social comparisons. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 311–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin, L. F., & Kulik, J. A. (2002). Social comparison and women’s body dissatisfaction. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 115–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lonsway, K., & Fitzgerald, L. (1995). Attitudinal antecedents of rape myth acceptance: A theoretical and empirical examination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 704–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Major, B. (1994). From social inequality to personal entitlement: The role of social comparisons, legitimacy, appraisals, and group membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, (Vol. 26, pp. 293–355). San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, M. C., & Gentry, J. W. (1997). Stuck in the model trap: The effects of beautiful models in ads on female preadolescents and adolescents. Journal of Advertising, 26, 19–33.Google Scholar
  25. Martin, M. C., & Kennedy, P. F. (1994). The measurement of social comparison to advertising models: A gender gap revealed. In J. A. Costa (Ed.), Gender issues and consumer behavior (pp. 104–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Motoko, M., & Fumiko, M. (2002). Effects of generalized self-efficacy and negative social comparison feedback on specific self-efficacy and performance. Psychological Reports, 90, 310–309.Google Scholar
  28. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Posavac, H. D., Posavac, S. S., & Posavac, E. J. (1998). Exposure to media images of female attractiveness and concern with body weight among young women. Sex Roles, 38, 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2004). Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved August 24, 2004, from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Interactive Mediation Tests Web site: http://www. unc.edu/∼preacher/sobel/sobel.htmlGoogle Scholar
  31. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Schimel, J., Greenberg, J., & Martens, A. (2003). Evidence that projection of a feared trait can serve a defensive function. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 969–979.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stice, E., & Shaw, H. E. (1994). Adverse effects of the media portrayed thin-ideal on women and linkages to bulimic symptomology. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 13, 288–308.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, J. K., & Heinberg, L. J. (1999). The media’s influence on body image disturbance and eating disorders: We’ve reviled them, now can we rehabilitate them? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wilcox, K., & Laird, S. (2000). The impact of media images of super-slender women on women’s self-esteem: Identification, social comparison, and self-perception. Journal of Research in Personality, 34, 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bianca N. Loya
    • 1
  • Gloria Cowan
    • 1
  • Christine Walters
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State UniversitySan BernardinoUSA

Personalised recommendations