Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 54, Issue 1–2, pp 95–111 | Cite as

The Relationship of Job Attribute Preferences to Employment, Hours of Paid Work, and Family Responsibilities: An Analysis Comparing Women and Men

  • Elizabeth A. Corrigall
  • Alison M. Konrad
Article

Abstract

We used 1997 International Social Survey Programme data from 14 countries to examine the relationship of job attribute preferences to family responsibilities, employment, and paid work hours. Separate regression analyses for women and men examined whether family responsibilities (marriage, children, spousal employment, and housework responsibility) predicted job attribute preferences. Many family responsibilities were significant predictors of men's and women's extrinsic and intrinsic preferences. Family responsibilities also predicted women's flexibility preferences. We next examined whether job attribute preferences were associated with employment and weekly paid work hours when family responsibilities were controlled. Job attribute preferences showed several significant relationships to women's and men's employment and several significant relationships to women's paid work hours.

Key Words

job attribute preferences work and family work values 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aldous, J. (1996). Family careers: Rethinking the developmental perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alwin, D. F., Braun, M., & Scott, J. (1992). The separation of work and family: Attitudes toward women's labour-force participation in Germany, Great Britain, and United States. European Sociological Review, 8, 13–37.Google Scholar
  3. Baxter, J., & Kane, E. W. (1995). Dependence and interdependence: A cross-national analysis of gender inequality and gender attitudes. Gender and Society, 9, 193–215.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3, S33–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, P. E., & Moen, P. (1999). Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 995–1007.Google Scholar
  6. Beutell, N. J., & Brenner, O. C. (1986). Sex differences in work values. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 28, 29–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bianchi, S. M., Milkie, M. A., Sayer, L. C., & Robinson, J. P. (2000). Is anyone doing the housework? Trends in the gender division of household labor. Social Forces, 79, 191–228.Google Scholar
  8. Borg, I. (1991). On the relationship between importance and satisfaction ratings on job aspects. Applied Psychology, 40, 81–92.Google Scholar
  9. Braun, M., Scott, J., & Alwin, D. F. (1994). Economic necessity or self-actualization? Attitudes toward women's labour-force participation in East and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 10, 29–47.Google Scholar
  10. Burn, S. M., & Probert, J. (1993). Components of and support for the male gender role: A survey research study. Unpublished manuscript, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, P. N., & Bianchi, S. M. (1999, December). Marriage, children, and women's employment: What do we know? Monthly Labor Review, pp. 22–31.Google Scholar
  12. Coleman, M. T., & Pencavel, J. (1993a). Changes in work hours of male employees. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 262–283.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, M. T., & Pencavel, J. (1993b). Trends in market work behavior of women since 1940. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46, 653–676.Google Scholar
  14. Coltrane, S. (2000). Research on household labor: Modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1208–1233.Google Scholar
  15. de Vaus, D., & McAllister, I. (1991). Gender and work orientation: Values and satisfaction in Western Europe. Work and Occupations, 18, 72–93.Google Scholar
  16. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  17. Einhorn, B. (1993). Cinderella goes to market: Citizenship, gender and women's movements in East Central Europe. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  18. Emrick, C. G., Denmark, F. L., & Den Harten, D. N. (2004). Cross-cultural differences in gender egalitarianism: Implications for societies, organizations, and leaders. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies (pp. 343–394). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. General Social Science Infrastructure Services. (2005a, January 11). Introduction to ISSP. Retrieved August 23, 2005 from http://www.gesis.org/en/data_service/issp/introduction.htm.
  20. General Social Science Infrastructure Services. (2005b, January 11). Work Orientations II. Retrieved August 23, 2005 from http://www.gesis.org/en/data_service/issp/data/list_cdbk_pdf.htm.
  21. Gornick, J. C., Meyers, M. K., & Ross, K. E. (1998). Public policies and employment of mothers: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 35–54.Google Scholar
  22. Gregory, A. (1990). Are women different and why are women thought to be different? Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gutek, B. A. (1993). Changing the status of women in management. Applied Psychology, 42, 301–311.Google Scholar
  24. Hales, L. W., & Waggoner, J. (1985, October). Measuring the work values of public school administrators. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 18, 108–117.Google Scholar
  25. Heinen, J. (1990). The impact of social policy in the behaviours of women workers in Poland and East Germany. Critical Social Policy, 10, 79–91.Google Scholar
  26. House, R. J., & Javidan, M. (2004). Overview of GLOBE. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta. (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 societies (pp. 9–28). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Jencks, C., Perman, L., & Rainwater, L. (1988). What is a good job? A new measure of labor market success. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1322–1357.Google Scholar
  28. Johnson, M. K. (2001). Change in job values during the transition to adulthood. Work and Occupations, 28, 315–345.Google Scholar
  29. Kalleberg, A., & Rosenfeld, R. A. (1990). Work and the family in the labor market: A cross-national, reciprocal analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 331–346.Google Scholar
  30. Kaufman, G., & Uhlenberg, P. (2000). The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces, 78, 931–949.Google Scholar
  31. Kirchmeyer, C. (1992). Nonwork participation and work attitudes: A test of scarcity vs. expansion models of personal resources. Human Relations, 45, 775–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kolinsky, E. (1991). Women in the new Germany. Politics and Society in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, 3, 1–22.Google Scholar
  33. Konrad, A. M. (2003). Family demands and job attribute preferences: A 4-year longitudinal study of women and men. Sex Roles, 49, 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Konrad, A. M., Corrigall, E., Lieb, P., & Ritchie, J. E., Jr. (2000). Sex differences in job attribute preferences among managers and business students. Group and Organization Management, 25, 108–131.Google Scholar
  35. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Major, V. S., Klein, K. J., & Ehrhart, M. G. (2002). Work time, work interference with family, and psychological distress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 427–436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Mannheim, B., & Schiffrin, M. (1984). Family structure, job characteristics, rewards and strains as related to work-role centrality of employed and self-employed professional women with children. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 83–101.Google Scholar
  38. Martire, L. M., & Stephens, M. A. P. (2003). Juggling parent care and employment responsibilities: The dilemmas of adult daughter caregivers in the workforce. Sex Roles, 48, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mottaz, C. (1986). Gender differences in work satisfaction, work-related rewards and values, and the determinants of work satisfaction. Human Relations, 39, 359–378.Google Scholar
  40. Pascual, L., Haynes, O. M., Galperín, C. Z., & Bornstein, M. H. (1995). Psychosocial determinants of whether and how much new mothers work. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 314–330.Google Scholar
  41. Pencavel, J. (1998). The market work behavior and wages of women 1975–1994. Journal of Human Resources, 33, 771–804.Google Scholar
  42. Perkins, H. W., & DeMeis, D. K. (1996). Gender and family effects on the “second shift” domestic activity of college-educated wives. Gender & Society, 10, 78–93.Google Scholar
  43. Posner, B. Z., & Powell, G. N. (1990). A longitudinal investigation of work preferences among college graduates. Psychological Reports, 66, 1125–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ragins, B. R., & Sundstrom, E. (1989). Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 51–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rothbard, N. P. (2001). Enriching or depleting? The dynamics of engagement in work and family roles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655–684.Google Scholar
  46. Ruderman, M. N., Ohlott, P. J., Panzer, K., & King, S. N. (2002). Benefits of multiple roles for managerial women. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 369–386.Google Scholar
  47. Sandquist, K. (1992). Sweden's sex-role scheme and commitment to gender equality. In S. Lewis, D. N. Izraeli, & H. Hootsman (Eds.), Dual-earner families: International perspectives (pp. 80–98). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Schmidt, M. G. (1993). Gendered labour force participation. In F. Castles (Ed.), Families of nations: Patterns of public policy in Western nations, (pp. 179–237). Brookfield VT: Darmouth.Google Scholar
  49. Shelton, B. A. (1992). Men, women, and time: Gender differences in paid work, housework, and leisure. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  50. Treas, J., & Widmer, E. D. (2000). Married women's employment over the life course: Attitudes in cross-national perspective. Social Forces, 78, 1409–1436.Google Scholar
  51. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1991). Doing gender. In J. Lorber & S. A. Farrell (Eds.), The social construction of gender (pp. 13–37). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Wheeler, K. G., & Miller, J. G. (1990). The relation of career and family factors to the expressed minimum percentage pay increase required for relocation. Journal of Management, 16, 825–834.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self viewed cross-culturally. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Penn State Worthington ScrantonDunmore
  2. 2.Richard Ivey School of BusinessUniversity of Western OntarioNorth, LondonCanada
  3. 3.Penn State Worthington ScrantonDunmore

Personalised recommendations