Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 9–10, pp 727–738 | Cite as

Research Productivity, Gender, Family, and Tenure in Organization Science Careers

  • Teresa J. Rothausen-Vange
  • Janet H. Marler
  • Patrick M. Wright
Article

Abstract

In a sample of 162 associate professors of organization science, women in more research-oriented departments had published significantly more during their assistant professor periods than did those in less research-oriented departments, whereas this effect was not observed for men. In more research-oriented departments, men were more likely to have had families (partners and/or dependents) in their assistant professor periods than were women. Patterns in the data suggest that women published more than men in more research-oriented departments but less than men in less research-oriented departments. Findings are discussed in light of person–organization fit theories, gender theories, academic productivity, and gender differences research.

Key Words

productivity promotion gender tenure family academic careers self-selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armenti, C. (2004). May babies and posttenure babies: Maternal decisions of women professors. The Review of Higher Education, 27, 211–231.Google Scholar
  2. Aryee, S., & Luk, V. (1996). Balancing two major parts of adult life experience: Work and family identity among dual-earner couples. Human Relations, 49, 465–487.Google Scholar
  3. Bailyn, L. (1993). Breaking the mold. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bedeian, A. G. (1996). Lessons learned along the way: Twelve suggestions for optimizing career success. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life (pp. 3–9). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Chacko, T. I. (1983). Job and life satisfactions: A causal analysis of their relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 163–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Committee on Women Faculty. (1999). A study on the status of women faculty in science at MIT. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  8. Doctoral Faculty Commission to AACSB International's Board of Directors. (2003). Sustaining Scholarship in Business Schools. St. Louis, MO: AACSB International—The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business.Google Scholar
  9. Erez, M. (1996). Rhythms of an academic's life: Crossing cultural boarders. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life (pp. 19–29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Estrada, M., Kacmar, K. M., & Hasselback, J. R. (1997, March). Diversity and the glass ceiling: The case of management faculty. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southwest Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  11. Federal Glass Ceiling Commission. (1997). The glass ceiling. In D. Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/women's place: An anthology (pp. 226–233). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  12. Friedman, S. D., & Greenhaus, J. H. (2000). Work and family: Allies or enemies? New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Gallos, J. V. (1996). On becoming a scholar: One woman's journey. In P. J. Frost & M. S. Taylor (Eds.), Rhythms of academic life (pp. 11–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Hasselback, J. R. (1995). Directory of management faculty. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Hewlett, S. A. (2002). Creating a life: Professional women and the quest for children. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  16. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Jacobs, J. A., & Winslow, S. E. (2004). The academic life course, time pressures, and gender inequality. Community, Work and Family, 7, 143–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, J. L., & Podsakoff, P. M. (1994). Journal influence in the field of management: An analysis using Salancik's index in a dependency network. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1392–1407.Google Scholar
  19. Kelly, E. (2000, February). Where do we find employer-sponsored child care? Paper presented at the second annual academic conference on Work and Family: Expanding the Horizons, San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  20. Kittay, E. F. (1995). Taking dependency seriously: The Family and Medical Leave Act considered in light of the social organization of dependency work and gender equality. Hypatia, 10, 8–29.Google Scholar
  21. Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593–641.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kulis, S., & Sicotte, D. (2002). Women scientists in academia: Geographically constrained to big cities, college clusters, or the coasts? Research in Higher Education, 43, 1–30.Google Scholar
  23. Long, J. S., Allison, P. D., & McGinnis, R. (1993). Rank advancement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity. American Sociological Review, 58, 703–722.Google Scholar
  24. Long, R. G., Bowers, W. P., Barnett, T., & White, M. C. (1998). Research productivity of graduates in management: Effects of academic origin and academic affiliation. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 704–714.Google Scholar
  25. Marczely, B. (1997). The role of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 and collective bargaining in maintaining gender discrimination in public higher education. Journal of Collective Negotiations, 26, 113–124.Google Scholar
  26. Mason, M. A., & Goulden, M. (2002). Do babies matter? The effect of family formation on the lifeline careers of academic men and women. Academe, November–December, 21–27.Google Scholar
  27. Moen, P. (Ed.). (2003). It's about time: Couples and careers. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moore, D. P., & Hass, M. (1990). When affirmative action cloaks management bias in selection and promotion decisions. Academy of Management Executive, 4, 84–90.Google Scholar
  29. Newman, J. M., & Cooper, E. (1993). Determinants of academic recognition: The case of the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O'Laughlin, E. M., & Bischoff, L. G. (2005). Balancing parenthood and academia: Work/family stress as influenced by gender and tenure status. Journal of Family Issues, 26, 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Park, S. H., & Gordon, M. E. (1996). Publication records and tenure decisions in the field of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pixley, J., & Moen, P. (2003). Couples career priorities. In P. Moen (Ed.), It's about time: Couples and careers (pp. 183–202). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  33. Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1994). Investigating the “glass ceiling” phenomenon: An empirical study of actual promotions to top management. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 68–86.Google Scholar
  34. Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 28–42.Google Scholar
  35. Rain, J. S., Lane, I. M., & Steiner, D. D. (1991). A current look at the job satisfaction/life satisfaction relationship: Review and future considerations. Human Relations, 44, 287–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Raymond, R. D., Sesnowitz, M. L., & Williams, D. R. (1993). Further evidence on gender and academic rank . Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 33, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Reingold, J. (2000, May 22). The MBA: It's still a guy thing. Business Week online, www.businessweek.com.Google Scholar
  38. Rosenberg, J., Perlstadt, H., & Phillips, W. R. F. (1997). ‘Now that we are here’: Discrimination, disparagement, and harassment at work and the experience of women lawyers. In D. Dunn (Ed.), Workplace/women's place: An anthology (pp. 247–259). Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
  39. Rothausen, T. J. (1994). Job satisfaction and the parent worker: The role of flexibility and rewards . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 44, 317–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rothausen, T. J. (1999). “Family” in organizational research: A review and comparison of definitions and measures. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 817–836.Google Scholar
  41. Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.Google Scholar
  42. Szafran, R. F. (1984). Universities and women faculty: Why some organizations discriminate more than others. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  43. van Anders, S. M. (2004). Why the academic pipeline leaks: Fewer men than women perceive barriers to becoming professors. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 51, 511–521.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why work and family conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Zuckerman, H., Cole, J. R., & Bruer, J. T. (Eds). (1991). The outer circle: Women in the scientific community. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teresa J. Rothausen-Vange
    • 1
    • 4
  • Janet H. Marler
    • 2
  • Patrick M. Wright
    • 3
  1. 1.University of St. ThomasMinneapolis
  2. 2.State University of New YorkAlbany
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityUSA
  4. 4.University of St. ThomasMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations