Advertisement

Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 5–6, pp 337–346 | Cite as

Work, Leisure, and Support Groups: An Examination of the Ways Women with Infertility Respond to Pronatalist Ideology

  • Diana C. Parry
Article

Abstract

Pronatalism embodies the belief that a woman's social value is linked to her production of biological children (C. Morell, 2000). Conceiving and bearing children is literally impossible, however, for some of the 5 million women in the United States who struggle with infertility. Women negotiate their experiences with infertility within a pronatalist society, yet their experiences therein have been given little attention. Thus, the purpose of this research was to explore women's lived experiences with infertility in a pronatalist ideology. Active interviews with 32 participants who had experienced infertility revealed that the women were aware of a pronatalist ideology, which was manifested through insensitive comments or questions and unsolicited advice. The women responded by immersing themselves in their work, leisure activities/experiences, or support groups. The findings illustrate how pronatalist ideology is manifest in social interactions, but they also suggest how it may be resisted.

Keywords

feminist epistemology infertility pronatalism resistance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambert, A., Adler, P. A., Adler, P., & Detzner, D. F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 879–893.Google Scholar
  2. Aronson, D. E. (2000). Defining infertility. Public Health Reports, 115, 6.Google Scholar
  3. Boston Women's Health Book Collective. Our bodies, ourselves. (3rd ed.). (1998). New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  4. Daniluk, J. (1997). Helping patients cope with infertility. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 40, 661–672.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dupuis, S. (1998). Naked truths: Toward a reflexive methodology in leisure research. Leisure Sciences, 21, 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher, B. (1992). Against the grain: Lives of women without children. IRIS: A Journal About Women, 2, 46–51.Google Scholar
  7. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  8. Green, D., Woodward, S., & Hebron, E. (1990). Women's leisure: What leisure? Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Green, E. (1998). ‘Women doing friendship’: An analysis of women's leisure as a site of identity construction, empowerment, and resistance. Leisure Studies, 17, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Greil, A. L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Horvath, K. A. (1999). Infertility treatment: An argument for mandated coverage. Journal of Health Law, 32(3), 445–469.Google Scholar
  12. Iwasaki, Y., & Mannell, R. C. (2000). Hierarchical dimensions of leisure stress coping. Leisure Sciences, 22, 163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jordon, C., & Revenson, T. A. (1999). Gender differences in coping with infertility: A meta-analysis. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 22, 341–358.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaufman, B. J. (1992). Feminist facts: Interview strategies and political subjects in ethnography. Communication Theory, 2, 187–206.Google Scholar
  15. Morell, C. (2000). Saying no: Women's experiences with reproductive refusal. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schwandt, T. (2001). Dictionary of qualitative inquiry (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Shaw, S. M. (1994). Gender, leisure, and constraint: Toward a framework for the analysis of women's leisure. Journal of Leisure Research, 26, 8–22.Google Scholar
  18. Shaw, S. M. (2001). Conceptualizing resistance: Women's leisure as political practice. Journal of Leisure Research, 33, 186–201.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, D. (1990). The conceptual practices of power. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Spector, A. (2004). Psychological issues and interventions with infertile patients. Women and Therapy, 27, 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thompson, L. (1992). Feminist methodology for family studies. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 3–18.Google Scholar
  22. Ulrich, M., & Weatherall, A. (2000). Motherhood and infertility: Viewing motherhood through the lens of infertility. Feminism and Psychology, 10, 323–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wolf, N. (2001). (Misconceptions). Truth, lies, and the unexpected on the journey of motherhood. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  24. Woliver, L. R. (2002). The political geographies of pregnancy. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Recreation and Leisure StudiesUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations