Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Gender, Belief in the Sexual Double Standard, and Sexual Talk in Heterosexual Dating Relationships

Abstract

This study was focused on the extent to which sex, gender, and attitudes toward sexuality influenced the amount and quality of sexual communication within 698 heterosexual dating couples. Women reported more dyadic sexual negotiation but less sexual negotiation efficacy than their male partners, and individuals with less traditional attitudes toward gender roles and sexuality indicated that they discussed more sexual issues and disclosed more sexual information with their partners. Couples with more dyadic sexual communication and sexual assertiveness (but lesser negotiation efficacy) reported increased relational satisfaction. We frame the findings from a script perspective, and our results suggest that individuals who self-disclose important information about sexual issues contribute to the effectiveness of sexual communication in a dating relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Afifi, W. A. (1999). Harming the ones we love: Relational attachment and perceived consequences as predictors of safe sex behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 198–206.

  2. Brown, N. R., & Sinclair, R. C. (1999). Estimating number of lifetime sexual partners: Men and women do it differently. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 292–297.

  3. Buysse, A., & Ickes, W. (1999). Communication patterns in laboratory discussions of safer sex between dating and nondating partners. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 121–134.

  4. Byers, E. S. (1996). How well does the traditional sexual script explain sexual coercion? Review of a program of research. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 8, 7–25.

  5. Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-discourse within dating relationships. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 180–189.

  6. Caron, S. L., Davis, C. M., Halteman, W. A., & Stickle, M. (1993). Predictions of condom-related behaviors among first-year college students. Journal of Sex Research, 30, 252–259.

  7. Catania, J. A., Coates, T. J., Kegeles, S., Fullilove, M. T., Peterson, J., Marin, B., Siegel, D., & Hulley, S. (1992). Condom use in multi-ethnic neighborhoods of San Francisco: The population-based AMEN (AIDS in multi-ethnic neighborhoods) study. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 284–287.

  8. Cohen, D. J., & Bruce, K. E. (1997). Sex and mortality: Real risk and perceived vulnerability. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 279–291.

  9. Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 13–26.

  10. Cupach, W. R., & Comstock, J. (1990). Satisfaction with sexual communication in marriage: Links to sexual satisfaction and dyadic adjustment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7, 179–186.

  11. DeLamater, J. (1987). Gender differences in sexual scenarios. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Females, males, and sexuality (pp. 127–139). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  12. Duffy, S. M., & Rusbult, C. E. (1986). Satisfaction and commitment in homosexual and heterosexual relationships. Journal of Homosexuality, 12, 1–23.

  13. Edgar, T., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1993). Expectations for sexual interaction: A cognitive test of the sequencing of sexual communication behaviors. Health Communication, 5, 239–261.

  14. Faulkner, S. L., & Greene, K. (2002, November). Sexual self-disclosure in heterosexual dating relationships. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.

  15. Faulkner, S. L., & Mansfield, P. K. (2002). Reconciling messages: The process of sexual talk for Latinas. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 310–328.

  16. Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58, 29–53.

  17. Gagnon, J. H. (1990). The explicit and implicit use of the scripting perspective in sex research. Annual Review of Sex Research, 1, 1–43.

  18. Gentry, M. (1998). The sexual double standard: The influence of number of relationships and level of sexual activity on judgments of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 505–511.

  19. Giffin, K. (1998). Beyond empowerment: Heterosexualities and the prevention of AIDS. Social Science and Medicine, 46, 151–156.

  20. Gomez, C. A., & Marin, B. V. (1996). Gender, culture, and power: Barriers to HIV-prevention strategies for women. Journal of Sex Research, 33, 355–362.

  21. Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., Yep, G. A., & Petronio, S. (2003). Privacy and disclosure of HIV in interpersonal relationships: A sourcebook for researchers and practitioners. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  22. Herold, S. E., & Way, L. (1988). Sexual self-disclosure among university women. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 1–14.

  23. Hurlbert, D. E. (1991). The role of assertiveness in female sexuality: A comparative study between sexually aggressive and sexually nonassertive women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 17, 183–190.

  24. Hynie, M., & Lydon, J. E. (1995). Women's perceptions of female contraceptive behavior: Experimental evidence of the sexual double standard. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 563–581.

  25. Hynie, M., Lydon, J. E., Cote, S., & Wiener, S. (1998). Relational sexual scripts and women's condom use: The importance of internalized norms. Journal of Sex Research, 35, 370–380.

  26. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  27. Lock, S. E., Ferguson, S. L., & Wise, C. (1998). Communication of sexual risk behavior among late adolescents. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 20, 273–294.

  28. Marin, B. V. (1996). Cultural issues in HIV prevention for Latinos: Should we try to change gender roles? In S. Oskamp & S. C. Thompson (Eds.), Understanding and preventing HIV risk behavior: Safer sex and drug use (pp. 157–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  29. Metts, S., & Fitzpatrick, M. A. (1992). Thinking about safer-sex: The risky business of ‘know your partner’ advice. In T. Edgar, M. A. Fitzpatrick, & V. S. Freimuth (Eds.), AIDS: A communication perspective (pp. 1–19). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  30. Metts, S., & Spitzberg, B. H. (1996). Sexual communication in interpersonal contexts: A script-based approach. In B. R. Burleson (Ed.), Communication yearbook 19 (pp. 49–91). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  31. Milhausen, R. R., & Herold, E. S. (1999). Does the sexual double standard still exist? Perceptions of university women. Journal of Sex Research, 36, 361–368.

  32. Morokoff, P. J. (2000). A cultural context for sexual assertiveness in women. In C. B. Travis & J. W. White (Eds.), Sexuality, society and feminism (pp. 299–319). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.

  33. Morokoff, P. J., Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Whitmire, L., Grimley, D. M., Gibson, P. R., & Burkholder, G. J. (1997). Sexual assertiveness scale (SAS) for women: Development and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 790–804.

  34. Muehlenhard, C. L., & Hollabaugh, L. C. (1988). Do women sometimes say no when they mean yes? The prevalence and correlates of women's token resistance to sex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 872–879.

  35. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

  36. O'Sullivan, L. F. (1995). Less is more: The effects of sexual experience on judgments of men's and women's personality characteristics and relationship desirability. Sex Roles, 33, 159–180.

  37. O'Sullivan, L. F., & Byers, S. E. (1992). College students' incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 29, 435–446.

  38. Quina, K., Harlow, L. L., Morokoff, P. J., Burkholder, G., & Deiter, P. J. (2000). Sexual communication in relationships: When words speak louder than actions. Sex Roles, 42, 523–549.

  39. Rubin, L. (1990). Erotic wars: What happened to the sexual revolution? New York: Fanar, Straus, & Giroux.

  40. Seal, D. W. (1997). Interpartner concordance of self-reported sexual behavior among college dating couples. Journal of Sex Research, 34, 39–55.

  41. Simon, W., & Gagnon, J. H. (1987). A sexual scripts approach. In J. H. Geer & W. T. O'Donohue (Eds.), Theories of human sexuality (pp. 363–383). New York: Plenum.

  42. Sprecher, S. (1989). Premarital sexual standards for different categories of individuals. Journal of Sex Research, 26, 232–248.

  43. Sprecher, S., McKinney, K., & Orbuch, T. L. (1991). The effect of current sexual behavior on friendship, dating, and marriage desirability. Journal of Sex Research, 28, 387–408.

  44. Troth, A., & Peterson, C. C. (2000). Factors predicting safer-sex talk and condom use in early sexual relationships. Health Communication, 12, 195–218.

  45. Wheeless, L. R., & Parsons, L. A. (1995). What you feel is what you might get: Exploring sexual communication apprehension and sexual communication satisfaction. Communication Research Reports, 12, 39–45.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Kathryn Greene.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greene, K., Faulkner, S.L. Gender, Belief in the Sexual Double Standard, and Sexual Talk in Heterosexual Dating Relationships. Sex Roles 53, 239–251 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-5682-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • gender sexual attitudes
  • disclosure
  • heterosexual dating couples
  • sexual scripts
  • sexual self-disclosure
  • sexual talk