Sex Roles

, Volume 53, Issue 1–2, pp 143–151 | Cite as

Married Women’s Situational Use of Last Names: An Empirical Study



Situational last name use was examined in a sample of 600 married women who responded to a mail survey. The sample was selected from the faculty and staff of a state university in the Midwest with over-sampling of women whose last name differed from their husband’s last name. Overall, 12% of married women reported situational last name use. Women from all last name choices (e.g., changed to husband’s, kept birth surname) reported situational surname use, but the most common occurrence of this practice was among hyphenators. Situational users were most likely to use their husband’s last name in family situations and their birth surname in professional situations. Factors that increase situational last name use included full-time employment, higher levels of educational attainment, and an older age at marriage. Situational last name use by married women can be seen as a manifestation of ambiguity over identity with family and non-family roles.

Key Words

married women’s surnames situational last name use marital roles women’s roles 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1991). The consequences of divorce for attitudes toward divorce and gender roles. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 306–322.Google Scholar
  2. Amato, P., & Booth, A. (1995). Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality. American Sociological Review, 60, 58–66.Google Scholar
  3. Argue, A., Johnson, D. R., & White, L. K. (1999). Age and religiosity: Evidence from a three-wave panel analysis. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 38, 423–435.Google Scholar
  4. Bernard, J. (1981). The female world. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, J. (1982). The future of marriage (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Booth, A., Johnson, D., White, L., & Edwards, J. (1991). Marital instability over the life course: Methodology report and code book for a three wave panel study. Lincoln, NE: Department of Sociology, University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  7. Brightman, J. (1994). Why wives use their husband’s names. Asmerican Demographics, 16, 9–10.Google Scholar
  8. Duggan, A., Cota, A., & Dion, K. (1993). Taking thy husband’s name: What might it mean? Names, 41, 87–102.Google Scholar
  9. Ellison, C., & Bartkowski, J. (2002). Conservative protestantism and division of labor among married couples. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 950–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etaugh, C., Bridges, J., Cummings-Hill, M., & Cohen, J. (1999). Names can never hurt me: The effects of surname use on perceptions of married women. Psychology of Women Quaraterly, 23, 819–823.Google Scholar
  11. Forbes, G., Adams-Curtis, L., White, K., & Hamm, N. (2002). Perceptions of married women and married men with hyphenated surnames. Sex Roles, 46, 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foss, K., & Edson, B. (1989). What’s in a name? Accounts of married women’s name choices. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53, 356–373.Google Scholar
  13. Fox, J. (1997). Applied regression analysis, linear models, and related methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Grasmick, H. W., Wilcox, L. P., & Bird, S. (1990). The effects of religious fundamentalism and religiosity on preference for traditional family values. Sociological Inquiry, 60, 352–369.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, L., & Jensen, J. (1993). Family values, religiosity and gender. Psychological Reports, 73, 429–430.Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, D., & Scheuble, L. (1995). Women’s marital naming in two generations: A national study. Journal of Marriage and Family, 57, 724–732.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, D., & Scheuble, L. (1996, August). Women’s marital name choice: Determinants and effects. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  18. Johnson, D., & Scheuble, L. (1997, August). What should we call our kids? Choice of children’s surname when the mother and father have different last names. Paper Presented at the American Sociological Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Kline, S., Stafford, L., & Mikosovic, J. (1996). Women’s surnames: Decisions, interpretations and association with relational qualities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13, 593–617.Google Scholar
  20. Morgan, M. (1987). The impact of religion on gender-role attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 301–310.Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, J. C. (1985). Gender and communication. Dubuque, IA: Brown.Google Scholar
  22. Pedersen-Pietersen, L. (1997, March 16). To have and to hyphenate: The marriage name game. New York Times, p. F 11.Google Scholar
  23. Peterson, L., & Donnenwerth, G. (1997). Secularization and the influence of religion on beliefs about premarital sex. Social Forces, 75, 1071–1088.Google Scholar
  24. Ritzer, G. (1996). Sociological theory (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  25. Roscow, I. (1994). Lessons from the museum: Claude Monet and social roles. Gerontologist, 34, 292–298.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Omi, M. (1997). The name of the maiden. Wisconsin’s Women’s Law Journal, 12, 253–299.Google Scholar
  27. Scheuble, L., & Johnson, D. (1993). Marital name change: Plans and attitudes of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 747–754.Google Scholar
  28. Stannard, U. (1984). Manners make laws: Married women’s names in the United States. Names, 32, 114–128.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, L., & Walker, A. (1989). Gender in families: Women and men in marriage, work and parenthood. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51, 845–871.Google Scholar
  30. Twenge, J. (1997). Mrs. his name. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 417–429.Google Scholar
  31. Vanderbilt, A. (1972). Amy Vanderbilt’s etiquette: The guide to gracious living. New York: Random House-Doubleday.Google Scholar
  32. Weitzman, L. (1981). The marriage contract: Spouses, lovers and the law. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  33. Winship, C., & Radbill, L. (1994). Sampling weights and regression analysis. Sociological Methods and Research, 23, 230–257.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe Pennsylvania State University
  2. 2.Department of Sociology211 Oswald Tower, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park

Personalised recommendations