Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 11–12, pp 743–756

Coercion in Intimate Partner Violence: Toward a New Conceptualization

Article

Abstract

For decades, battered women’s advocates have placed coercive control squarely at the center of their analysis of intimate partner violence. Yet, little work has been done to conceptualize and measure the key construct of coercive control. In this article, we apply French and Raven’s social power model to a conceptualization of coercive control in intimate partner violence relationships. Central elements of the model include: social ecology; setting the stage; coercion involving a demand and a credible threat for noncompliance; surveillance; delivery of threatened consequences; and the victim’s behavioral and emotional response to coercion. These elements occur in spiraling and overlapping sequences to establish an overall situation of coercive control. The implications of this model for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

intimate partner violence coercion development and validation measurement 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acierno, R., Resnick, H., Kilpatrick, D. G., Saunders, B., & Best, C. L. (1999). Risk factors for rape, physical assault, and posttraumatic stress disorder in women: Examination of differential multivariate relationships. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 13(6), 541–563.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, J., Johnson, R., Koziol-McLain, J., & Lowenstein, S. R. (1995). Domestic violence against women: Incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1763–1767.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual DSM-IV-TR. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, J. (2000). Sex differences in physical aggression to partners: A reply to Frieze (2000), O’Leary (2000), and White, Smith, Koss, & Figueredo (2000). Psychological Bulletin, 126(5), 697–702.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachman, R., & Saltzman, L. (1995). Violence against women: Estimates from the redesigned survey, Special Report. (No. NCJ-154348). Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  6. Bergman, B., & Brismar, B. (1991). Suicide attempts by battered wives. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 83, 380–384.Google Scholar
  7. Berk, R., Berk, S., Loseke, D., & Rauma, D. (1983). Mutual combat and other family victim myths. In D. Finkelhor, D. Gelles, G. Hotaling, & M. Straus (Eds.), The Dark Side of Families (pp. 197–212). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell, J. (1993). Men, women and aggression. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Campbell, J., Snow Jones, A., Dienemann, J., Kub, J., Schollenberger, J., O’Campo, P., Carlson Gielen, A., & Wynne, C. (2002). Intimate partner violence and physical health consequences. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 1157–1163.Google Scholar
  10. Campbell, J. C. (2002). Health consequences of intimate partner violence. The Lancet, 359, 1331–1336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell, J. C., & Lewandowski, L. A. (1997). Mental and physical health effects of intimate partner violence on women and children. Anger, aggression, and violence, 20, 353–369.Google Scholar
  12. Coker, A. L., Smith, P. H., Bethea, L., King, M. R., & McKeown, R. E. (2000). Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence. Archives of Family Medicine, 9(451–457).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dekeseredy, W. S., Schwartz, M. D., & Bergen, R. K. (Ed.) (1998). Male peer support and woman abuse in postsecondary school courtship: Suggestions for new directions in sociolgical research. Issues in intimate violence (pp. 83–96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Dobash, R., Dobash, R., Wilson, M., & Daly, M. (1992). The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems, 39, 71–91.Google Scholar
  15. Dutton, D. G., & Painter, S. (1993). Emotional attachments in abusive relationships: A test of traumatic bonding theory. Violence & Victims, 8(2), 105–120.Google Scholar
  16. Dutton, M. A. (1996). Battered women’s strategic response to violence: The role of context. In J. L. Edleson & Z. Eisikovits (Eds.), Future interventions with battered women and their families. (pp. 105–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Dutton, M. A. (2003, October). Determinants and Social Context of Battered Women’s Threat Appraisal. Paper presented at the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  18. Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L. A., & Bennett, L. (1999). Court-involved battered women’s responses to violence: The role of psychological, physical, and sexual abuse. Violence & Victims, 14(1), 89–104.Google Scholar
  19. Dutton, M. A., Goodman, L. A., Weinfurt, K., & Vankos, N. (2001). IPV Threat Appraisal. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  20. Dutton, M. A., Haywood, Y., & El-Bayoumi, G. (1997). Impact of violence on women’s health. In Health care for women: Psychological, social, and behavioral influences. (pp. 41–56). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  21. Edleson, J. L., & Tolman, R. M. (1992). Intervention for men who batter: An ecological approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Follingstad, D., Wright, S., Lloyd, S., & Sebastian, J. (1991). Sex differences in motivations and effects in dating violence. Family Relations, 40, 51–57.Google Scholar
  23. Follingstad, D. R., Brennan, A. F., Hause, E. S., Polek, D. S., & Rutledge, L. L. (1991). Factors moderating physical and psychological symptoms of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 6, 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In Studies in Social Power. (pp. 150–167). Oxford, England: University of Michigan, Oxford, England.Google Scholar
  25. Gelles, R., & Straus, M. (1988). Intimate violence: The causes and consequences of abuse in the American family. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
  26. Gold, S. N. (2000). Not trauma alone: Therapy for child abuse survivors in family and social context. New York, NY: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Gondolf, E. W. (1999). MCMI-III results for batterer program participants in four cities: Less “pathological” than expected. Journal of Family Violence, 14(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gondolf, E. W., & Heckert, D. A. (2003). Determinants of women’s perceptions of risk in battering relationships. Violence & Victims, 18(4), 371–386.Google Scholar
  29. Goodman, L. A., Dutton, M. A., Weinfurt, K., & Cook, S. (2003). The intimate partner violence strategies index: Development and application. Violence & Victims, 9(2), 163–186.Google Scholar
  30. Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1996). A large sample empirical typology of male spouse abusers and its relationship to dimensions of abuse. Violence & Victims, 11(4), 277–292.Google Scholar
  31. Hamberger, L. K., Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., & Tolin, D. F. (1997). An empirical classification of motivations for domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 3(4), 401–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hass, G. A., Dutton, M. A., & Orloff, L. E. (2000). Lifetime prevalence of violence against Latina immigrants: Legal and policy implications. International Review of Victimology, 7(1–3), 93–113.Google Scholar
  33. Holtzworth-Monroe, A., Smutzler, N., & Bates, L. (1997). A brief review of the research on husband violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 2(3), 285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2003). Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time? Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 71, 728–740). US: American Psychological Assn, US, http://www.apa.org.Google Scholar
  35. Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Rehman, U., & Herron, K. (2000). General and spouse-specific anger and hostility in subtypes of martially violent men and nonviolent men. Behavior Therapy, 31(4), 603–630.Google Scholar
  36. Hudek-Knezevic, J., & Kardum, I. (2000). The effects of dispositional and situational coping, perceived social support, and cognitive appraisal on immediate outcome. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16(3), 190–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson, M. (1995). Patriarchal terrorism and common couple violence: Two forms of violence against women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 283–294.Google Scholar
  38. Johnson, M. P., & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62(4), 948–963.Google Scholar
  39. Kaslow, N. J., Thompson, M. P., Meadows, L. A., Jacobs, D., Chance, S., Gibb, B., Bornstein, H., Hoolins, L., Rashid, A., & Phillips, K. (1998). Factors that mediate and moderate the link between partner abuse and suicidal behavior in African American women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 533–540.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kessler, R. C., Sonnega, A., Bromet, E., Hughes, M., & Nelson, C. B. (1995). Posttraumatic stress disorder in the National Comorbidity Study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 1048–1060.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kilpatrick, D. G., Acierno, R., Resnick, H. S., Saunders, B. E., & Best, C. L. (1997). A 2-year longitudinal analysis of the relationships between violent assault and substance use in women. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 834–847.Google Scholar
  42. Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  44. Lobel, T. E., & Gilat, I. (1998). The relationship between perceived probability of personal harm and distressful reactions during the Gulf War. International Journal of Stress Management, 5(2), 93–102.Google Scholar
  45. Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Mechanic, M. B., Weaver, T. L., & Resick, P. A. (2000). Intimate partner violence and stalking behavior: Exploration of patterns and correlates in a sample of acutely battered women., Violence & Victims, 15, 55–72). US: Springer Publishing, http://www.springerpub.com.
  47. Molidor, C., & Tolman, R. (1998). Gender and contextual factors in adolescent dating violence. Violence Against Women, 4(2), 180–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Molm, L. D. (1997). Coercive poser in social exchange. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. O’Leary, D. (2000). Are women really more aggressive than men in intimate relationships: Comment on Archer. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 685–689.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. O’Leary, K. D., Malone, J., & Tyree, A. (1994). Physical aggression in early marriage: Prerelationship and relationship effects. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 594–602.Google Scholar
  51. Piotrkowski, C. S., & Brannen, S. J. (2002). Exposure, threat appraisal, and lost confidence as predictors of PTSD symptoms following September 11, 2001. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72(4), 476–485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior & Personality, 7(2), 217–244.Google Scholar
  53. Raven, B. H. (1993). The bases of power: Origins and recent developments. Journal of Social Psychology, 49(4), 227–251.Google Scholar
  54. Resnick, H. S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Dansky, B. S., Saunders, B. E., & Best, C. L. (1993). Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 984–991.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Riger, S., Ahrens, C., & Blickenstaff, A. (2001). Measuring interference with employment and education reported by women with abusive partners: Preliminary data. In Psychological Abuse in Violent Domestic Relations. (pp. 119–133). New York, NY: Springer, http://www.springerpub.com.
  56. Rusbult, C. E., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001). Commitment and relationship maintenance mechanisms. In Close Romantic Relationships: Maintenance and Enhancement. (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ, US: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  57. Saunders, D. (1986). When battered women use violence: Husband-abuse or self-defense? Victims and Violence, 1, 47–60.Google Scholar
  58. Stein, M. B., & Kennedy, C. (2001). Major depressive and post-traumatic stress disorder comorbidity in female victims of intimate partner violence. Journal of Affective Disorders, 66(2, 3), 133–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Straus, M., & Gelles, R. (1990). Violence in American families: Risk factors and adaptations to violence in 8,145 families. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Tolman, R. (1989). The development of a measure of psychological maltreatment of women by their male partners. Violence and Victims, 4, 173–189.Google Scholar
  61. Tolman, R. (1999). The validation of the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory. Violence and Victims, 14, 25–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Walsh, F. (1982). Normal family processes. New York, NY, US: Guilford.Google Scholar
  63. Weissman, M. M., Bruce, M. L., Leaf, P. L., Florio, L. P., & Holzer, C. I. (1991). Affective disorders. In L. N. Robins & D. A. Regier (Eds.), Psychiatric disorders in America: The Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (pp. 53–80). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  64. Zlotnick, C., Kohn, R., Peterson, J., & Pearlstein, R. (1998). Partner physical victimization in a national sample of American families. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(1), 156–166.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashington
  2. 2.Boston CollegeChestnut Hill
  3. 3.Department of PsychiatryGeorgetown University Medical CenterWashington

Personalised recommendations