Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 9–10, pp 561–575 | Cite as

Money, Housework, Sex, and Conflict: Same-Sex Couples in Civil Unions, Those Not in Civil Unions, and Heterosexual Married Siblings

  • Sondra E. Solomon
  • Esther D. Rothblum
  • Kimberly F. Balsam

Abstract

In this study we examined the division of finances, the division of household tasks, relationship maintenance behaviors, sexual activity, monogamy, and conflict among same-sex couples who had had civil unions in Vermont, same-sex couples who had not had civil unions recruited from their friendship circles, and married heterosexual couples recruited from among their siblings. Married heterosexuals had a more traditional, gendered division of finances, household tasks, and relationship maintenance behaviors, even though the heterosexuals were all siblings or in-laws of lesbians or gay men. Sexual orientation was a stronger predictor of the division of household tasks than was income difference within couples. Lesbians reported less frequent sexual activity than married heterosexual women, and gay men were less monogamous than married heterosexual men. Gay men in civil unions differed on a few variables from gay men not in civil unions, but there were no differences among lesbians.

Key Words

civil unions same-sex couples lesbian couples gay male couples sexual orientation division of housework division of finances relationship maintenance behaviors 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, sex. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
  2. Bussell, D. A., & Reiss, D. (1993). Genetic influences on family process: The emergence of a new framework for family research. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (2nd ed., pp. 1611–181). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dibble, S., Roberts, S. A., & Nussey, B. (2004). Breast Cancer Risk Profiles between Lesbians and their Heterosexual Sisters. Women’s Health Issues, 14, 60–68.Google Scholar
  4. Dunne, G. A. (1997). Lesbian lifestyles: Women’s work and the politics of sexuality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, G. A. (1998). Living “difference”: Lesbian perspectives on work and family life. New York: Harrington Park Press.Google Scholar
  6. Eskridge, W. N. (2001). Equality practices: Civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Feinberg, M., & Hetherington, E. M. (2001). Differential parenting as a within-family variable. Journal of Family Psychology, 15, 22–37.Google Scholar
  8. Hickson, F. C. I., Davies, P. M., Hunt, A. J., Weatherburn, P., McManus, T. J., & Coxon, A. P. M. (1992). Maintenance of open gay relationships: Some strategies for protection against HIV. AIDS Care, 4, 409–419.Google Scholar
  9. Kurdek, L. A. (1989). Relationship quality in gay and lesbian cohabiting couples: A 1-year follow-up study. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 39–59.Google Scholar
  10. Loulan, J. (1988). Research on the sex practices of 1566 lesbians and the clinical implications. Women and Therapy, 7, 221–234.Google Scholar
  11. McCormick, N. B. (1994). Sexual salvation: Affirming women’s sexual rights and pleasures. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Peplau, L. A., Fingerhut, A., & Beals, K. P. (2004). Sexuality in the relationships of lesbians and gay men. In J. Harvey, A. Wenzel, & S. Sprecher (Eds.). Handbook of sexuality in close relationships (pp. 349–369). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Peplau, L. A., & Spalding, L. R. (2000). The close relationships of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals. In C. Hendrick & S. S. Hendrick (Eds.), Close relationships: A sourcebook (pp. 111–124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Rothblum, E. D., Balsam, K. F., & Mickey, R. M. (2004). Brothers and sisters of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals as a demographic comparison group: An innovative research methodology to examine social change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40, 283–301.Google Scholar
  15. Rothblum, E. D., Balsam, K. F., Solomon, S. E., & Factor, R. J. (in press). Siblings and sexual orientation: Products of alternative families or the ones who got away? Journal of GLBT Family Studies.Google Scholar
  16. Rothblum, E. D., & Brehony, K. A. (1993). Boston marriages: Romantic but asexual relationships among contemporary lesbians. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  17. Rothblum, E. D., & Factor, R. J. (2001). Lesbians and their sisters as a control group: Demographic and mental health factors. Psychological Science, 12, 63–69.Google Scholar
  18. Schachter, F. F. (1985). Sibling deidentification in the clinic: Devil versus angel. Family Process, 24, 415–427.Google Scholar
  19. Solomon, S. E., Rothblum, E. D., & Balsam, K. F. (2004). Pioneers in partnership: Lesbian and gay male couples compared with those not in civil unions, and married heterosexual siblings. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 275–286.Google Scholar
  20. Strasser, M. (2002). On same-sex marriage, civil unions, and the rule of law: Constitutional interpretation at the crossroads. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sondra E. Solomon
    • 1
  • Esther D. Rothblum
    • 1
  • Kimberly F. Balsam
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology, John Dewey HallUniversity of VermontBurlington
  2. 2.University of WashingtonSeattle

Personalised recommendations