Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 7–8, pp 523–532 | Cite as

More Spousal Support for Men Than for Women: A Comparison of Sources and Types of Support

Article

Abstract

Types and sources of received support among 902 Costa Rican employees were examined; gender and age differences as well as associations with mental health were considered. Four types of support (advice giving, assistance, reassurance, and empathic listening) were measured as received from four sources, namely friends, family, spouses, and groups/organizations. Support types were not very distinct, therefore we aggregated sum scores across these variables. In contrast, sources were discriminant and had to be analyzed separately. An interaction between gender and age pointed to a larger discrepancy of received spousal support in middle-aged men and women than in younger ones. The older the women were, the less support they received from their spouses. In addition to this interaction, further gender differences emerged at the correlation level, where the association between spousal support and depression was significant for men only.

Keywords

social support women spouses work stress depression mental health 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles, 17, 737–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: Women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496–505). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, S., Underwood, S., & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measures and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL): A self-report inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L., & Call, J. (1986). UCLA Social Support Inventory (UCLA-SSI). Unpublished psychometric instrument. Los Angeles: University of California.Google Scholar
  8. DuPertuis, L. L., Aldwin, C. M., & Bossé, R. (2003). Does the source of support matter for different health outcomes? Findings from the normative aging study. Retrieved January 31, 2003, from http://hcd.ucdavis.edu/faculty/aldwin/Support.pdf.
  9. Fredrickson, B. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (1998). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 511–538). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 234–242.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenglass, E. R. (1982). A world of difference: Gender roles in perspective. Toronto: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychology, 19, 274–282.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hobfoll, S. E. (1986). Stress, social support, and women. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  14. Klauer, T., & Winkeler, M. (2002). Gender, mental health status, and social support during a stressful event. In G. Weidner, M. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series, Series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 223–236). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  15. Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Gender and age differences in social support: A study of East German refugees. In G. Weidner, M. S. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series 1: Life and behavioural sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 198–210). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, G., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256–275.Google Scholar
  17. Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340.Google Scholar
  18. Laireiter, A., & Baumann, U. (1992). Network structures and support functions: Theoretical and empirical analyses. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 33–55). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  19. Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1998): Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 445–462). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mickelson, K. D., Helgeson, V. S., & Weiner, E. (1995). Gender effects on social support provision and receipt. Personal Relationships, 2, 211–224.Google Scholar
  21. Newcomb, M. D. (1990). What structural equation modeling can tell us about social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 26–63). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Davila, J. (1997). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361–378.Google Scholar
  24. Power, M., Bullinger, M., Harper, A., & World Health Organization Quality of Life Group, Switzerland. (1999). The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychology, 18, 495–505.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127–138.Google Scholar
  26. Schröder, K. E. E., Schwarzer, R., & Endler, N. S. (1997). Predicting cardiac patients’ quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 231– 244.Google Scholar
  27. Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716–732.Google Scholar
  28. Schwarzer, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Kemeny, M. (1994). The multidimensional nature of received social support in gay men at risk of HIV infections and AIDS. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 319–339.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1992). Social support and mental health: A conceptual and empirical overview. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 435–458). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Thoits, P. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thoits, P. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Uno, D., Uchino, B. N., & Smith, T. W. (2002). Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends of cardiovascular reactivity in women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 9, 243– 262.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson, D., Clark, A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Wills, T. A., & Fegan, M. F. (2001). Social networks and social support. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 209–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–563.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Freie UniversitätBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Universidad Estatal a DistanciaCosta Rica
  3. 3.GesundheitspsychologieFreie UniversitätBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations