Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 5–6, pp 399–406 | Cite as

Body Hair Removal: The ‘Mundane’ Production of Normative Femininity

  • Merran Toerien
  • Sue Wilkinson
  • Precilla Y. L. Choi


Although women’s body hair removal is strongly normative across contemporary Western cultures, only two studies of ‘mundane’ depilation have been published, and they were based on data from the US (Basow, 1991) and Australia (Tiggemann & Kenyon, 1998), respectively. The present survey, comprised of a sample of 678 women, extends this work. We investigated UK practices, a wider array of body regions and removal methods, and the relationship between depilation and age. Over 99% of participants reported removing some hair, most commonly from the underarms, legs, pubic area, and eyebrows. Shaving and plucking were the most common removal methods. Significant relationships between age and leg, pubic, and facial depilation were found. Results document the normativity of hair removal, and we argue that hair removal is part of the taken-for-granted work of producing an ‘acceptable’ femininity.


body hair depilation femininity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barth, J. H., Catalan, J., Cherry, C. A., & Day, A. (1993). Psychological morbidity in women referred for treatment of hirsutism. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 37, 615–619.Google Scholar
  2. Bartky, S. L. (1998). Foucault, femininity, and the modernization of patriarchal power. In R. Weitz (Ed.), The politics of women’s bodies: Sexuality, appearance, and behaviour (pp. 25–45). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Basow, S. A. (1991). The hairless ideal: Women and their body hair. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 83–96.Google Scholar
  4. Basow, S. A., & Braman, A. C. (1998). Women and body hair: Social perceptions and attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 637–645.Google Scholar
  5. Bem, S. L. (1978/1987). Probing the promise of androgyny. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), The psychology of women: Ongoing debates (pp. 206–225). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bornstein, K. (1994). Gender outlaw: On men, women, and the rest of us. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brace, N., Kemp, R., & Snelgar, R. (2000). SPSS for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Brownmiller, S. (1984). Femininity. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
  9. Chapkis, W. (1986). Beauty secrets: Women and the politics of appearance. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, W. (1971). Hair: Sex society symbolism. London: Aldus Books.Google Scholar
  11. Cramer, D. (1994). Introducing statistics for social research: Step-by-step calculations and computer techniques using SPSS. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body: Gender politics and the construction of sexuality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrante, J. (1988). Biomedical versus cultural constructions of abnormality: The case of idiopathic hirsutism in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 12, 219–238.Google Scholar
  14. Ferriman, D., & Gallwey, J. D. (1961). Clinical assessment of body hair growth in women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 21, 1440–1447.Google Scholar
  15. Firth, R. (1973). Hair as private asset and public symbol. In R. Firth (Ed.), Symbols public and private (pp. 262–298). London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  16. Freedman, R. (1986). Beauty bound. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gay and lesbian information. (2002). Retrieved November 25, 2003, from
  18. Gillette pins hopes on its new Venus women’s shaving system. (2000, November 11). Retrieved June 10, 2003, from
  19. Goodison, L. (1992). Moving heaven and earth: Sexuality, spirituality and social change. London: Pandora Press.Google Scholar
  20. Great Britain Central Statistical Office & Great Britain Office for National Statistics. (2002). Social trends (p. 32). London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  21. Greer, G. (1970). The female eunuch. London: MacGibbon and Kee.Google Scholar
  22. Hope, C. (1982). Caucasian female body hair and American culture. Journal of American Culture, 5, 93–99.Google Scholar
  23. Howell, D. C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.Google Scholar
  24. Howitt, D., & Cramer, D. (2000). An introduction to statistics for psychology: A complete guide for students. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, R. (2002, May 18). Bush whacked. The Spectator. Retrieved November 25, 2003, from
  26. Kitzinger, C., & Willmott, J. (2002). ‘The thief of womanhood‘: Women’s experiences of polycystic ovarian syndrome. Social Science and Medicine, 54, 349–362.Google Scholar
  27. Rabinowitz, S., Cohen, R., & Le Roith, D. (1983). Anxiety and hirsutism. Psychological Reports, 53, 827–830.Google Scholar
  28. Schweigert, W. A. (1994). Research methods and statistics for psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  29. Simpson, N. (1986). Unwanted hair. British Medical Journal, 293, 348–349.Google Scholar
  30. Synnott, A. (1993). The body social: Symbolism, self and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Tiggemann, M., & Kenyon, S. J. (1998). The hairlessness norm: The removal of body hair in women. Sex Roles, 39, 873–885.Google Scholar
  32. Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2003). Gender and body hair: Constructing the feminine woman. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(4), 333–344.Google Scholar
  33. Toerien, M., & Wilkinson, S. (2004). Exploring the depilation norm: A qualitative questionnaire study of women’s body hair removal. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1, 69–92.Google Scholar
  34. Whelehan, I. (2000). Overloaded: Popular culture and the future of feminism. London: Women’s Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wolf, N. (1991). The beauty myth: How images of beauty are used against women. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merran Toerien
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
  • Sue Wilkinson
    • 1
  • Precilla Y. L. Choi
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Social SciencesLoughborough UniversityUK
  2. 2.MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social MedicineUniversity of BristolUK
  3. 3.Centre for Ageing, Rehabilitation, Exercise and SportVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  4. 4.MRC Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social MedicineUniversity of BristolBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations