Sex Roles

, Volume 52, Issue 1–2, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Adolescent Girls’ and Boys’ Science Peer Relationships and Perceptions of the Possible Self as Scientist

Article

Abstract

Girls’ tend to have less peer support for their science interests than do boys, which may contribute to gender differences in science motivation. The effect of science peer relationships on adolescents’ visions of their possible personal future lives as scientists was studied in 161 female and 163 male gifted high school students who participated in summer science enrichment programs. Student reports of having positive science peer relationships were associated with more positive expectations of the possible personal self as scientist prior to the programs, and both program-related and nonprogram-related science peer relationships were associated with changes in the possible self at posttesting and at 6 month follow-up. These relations held for both male and female students. At follow-up, girls reported a stronger social niche with fellow program participants and stronger science peer relationships than did boys. Implications of the findings are discussed within the larger gendered societal context for science achievement.

KEY WORDS:

gender differences in science attitudes science motivation science peers possible self in science 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Institutes for Research. (1998). Gender gaps. When schools still fail our children. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 3–27.Google Scholar
  3. Bazler, J. A., Spokane, A. R., Ballard, R., & Fugate, M. S. (1993). The Jason Project experience and attitudes toward science as an enterprise and career. Journal of Career Development, 20, 101–112.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, B. B. (1990). Peer groups and peer cultures. In S. S. Feldman & G. R. Elliott (Eds.), At the threshold: The developing adolescent (pp. 171–196). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Catsambis, S. (1995). Gender, race, ethnicity, and science education in the middle grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 243–257.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, A. (1997). National science education standards: Looking backward and forward. Elementary School Journal, 97, 299–313.Google Scholar
  7. Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 423–438.Google Scholar
  8. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609.Google Scholar
  9. Erb, T. O., & Smith, W. (1984). Validation of the Attitude Toward Women in Science Scale for early adolescents. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21, 391–397.Google Scholar
  10. Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science and Education, 83, 55–75.Google Scholar
  11. Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63, 103–115.Google Scholar
  12. Gallagher, J. J. (1993). An intersection of public policy and social science: Gifted students and education in mathematics and science. In L. A. Penner, G. M. Batsche, H. M. Knoff, & D. L. Nelson (Eds.), The challenge in mathematics and science education: Psychology’s response (pp. 15–47). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  13. Goodenow, C., & Grady, K. E. (1993). The relationship of school belonging and friends’ values to academic motivation among urban adolescent students. Journal of Experimental Education, 62, 60–71.Google Scholar
  14. Greenfield, T. A. (1996). Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 901–933.Google Scholar
  15. Guzzetti, B. J., & Williams, W. O. (1996). Gender, text, and discussion: Examining intellectual safety in the science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 5–20.Google Scholar
  16. Jacobs, J. E., Finken, L. L., Griffin, N. L., & Wright, J. D. (1998). The career plans of science-talented rural adolescent girls. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 681–704.Google Scholar
  17. Jovanovic, J., & King, S. S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35, 477–496.Google Scholar
  18. Kahle, J. B., & Lakes, M. K. (1983). The myth of equality in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 131–140.Google Scholar
  19. Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 542–557). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Kahle, J. B., Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Riley, D. (1993). Gender differences in science education: Building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28, 379–404.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, A. (1988). Option choice for girls and boys. Research in Science and Technological Education, 6, 5–23.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, V. E., Marks, H. M., & Byrd, T. (1994). Sexism in single-sex and coeducational independent secondary school classrooms. Sociology of Education, 67, 92–120.Google Scholar
  23. Linn, M. C., Lewis, C., Tsuchida, I., & Songer, N. B. (2000). Beyond fourth-grade science: Why do U.S. and Japanese students diverge? Educational Research, 29, 4–14.Google Scholar
  24. Lips, H. M. (1992). Gender- and science-related attitudes as predictors of college students’ academic choices. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 40, 62–81.Google Scholar
  25. Lips, H. M. (1995). Through the lens of mathematical/scientific self-schemas: Images of students’ current and possible selves. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, 1671–1699.Google Scholar
  26. Lips, H. M. (2000). College students’ visions of power and possibility as moderated by gender. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 39–43.Google Scholar
  27. Manis, J. D., Thomas, N. G., Sloat, B. F., & Davis, C. G. (1989). An analysis of factors affecting choice of majors in science, mathematics, and engineering at the University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Center for Education of Women Research Reports.Google Scholar
  28. Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41, 954–969.Google Scholar
  29. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2001). Digest of Educational Statistics, 2000. Chapter 3. Postsecondary Education, 2000. Retrieved June 27, 2002, from http://www.nces.ed.gov/ pubs 2001/digest/dt257.html
  30. Phillips, K. A., Barrow, L. H., & Chandrasekhar, M. (2002). Science career interests among high school girls one year after participation in a summer science program. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 8, 235–247.Google Scholar
  31. Potter, E. F., & Rosser, S. V. (1992). Factors in life science: Textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 669–686.Google Scholar
  32. Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.Google Scholar
  33. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74, 1–18.Google Scholar
  34. Simpson, R. D., & Troost, K. M. (1982). Influences on commitment to and learning of science among adolescent students. Science Education, 66, 763–781.Google Scholar
  35. Stake, J. E. (2003). Understanding male bias against girls and women in science. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 1–17.Google Scholar
  36. Stake, J. E., & Mares, K. R. (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088.Google Scholar
  37. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.Google Scholar
  38. Talton, E. L., & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes toward science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69, 19–24.Google Scholar
  39. Terry, J. M., & Baird, W. E. (1997). What factors affect attitudes toward women in science held by high school biology students? School Science and Mathematics, 97, 78–86.Google Scholar
  40. Updegraff, K. A., McHale, S. M., & Crouter, A. C. (1996). Gender roles in marriage: What do they mean for girls’ and boys’ school achievement? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 25, 73–88.Google Scholar
  41. Ware, N. C., & Lee, V. E. (1988). Sex differences in choice of college science majors. American Educational Research Journal, 25, 593–614.Google Scholar
  42. Weinburgh, M. (1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Institute for Women’s and Gender StudiesUniversity of MissouriSt. Louis
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MissouriSt. Louis
  3. 3.Department of Psychology and Institute for Women’s and Gender StudiesUniversity of MissouriSt. Louis

Personalised recommendations