Sex Roles

, Volume 51, Issue 11–12, pp 719–730 | Cite as

Objectification Theory as It Relates to Disordered Eating Among College Women

  • Tracy L. TylkaEmail author
  • Melanie S. Hill


Objectification theory (B. L. Fredrickson & T. A. Roberts, 1997) demonstrates how sociocultural variables work together with psychological variables to predict disordered eating. Researchers have tested models that illustrate how certain constructsof objectification theory predict disordered eating, but a more comprehensive model that integrates a combination of constructs central to the theory (i.e., sexual objectification; self-objectification; body shame; poor interoceptive awareness of hunger, satiety, and emotions) has not yet been examined. In this study, we incorporated these variables within an inclusive model based on the assertions of B. L. Fredrickson and T. A. Roberts (1997) and examined it with 460 college women. Structural equation modeling analyses suggested that the model provided a good fit to the data and supported most propositions set forth by objectification theory and the eating disorders literature.

eating disorders objectification theory body image college women 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blascovich, J., Brennan, K., Tomaka, J., Kelsey, R. M., Hughes, P., Coad, M. L., & Adlin, R. (1992). Affect intensity and cardiac arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brookings, J. B., & Wilson, J. F. (1994). Personality and family-environment predictors of self-reported eating attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 313–326.Google Scholar
  4. Brownlow, B. S. (1997). The relationship between objectification, body image disturbances, and disordered eating: Investigating race, socioeconomic status, acculturation, and self-objectification as mediators. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costanzo, P. R., & Woody, E. Z. (1985). Domain-specific parenting styles and their impact on the child’s development of particular deviance: The example of obesity proneness. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 3, 425–445.Google Scholar
  7. Crandall, C. S. (1988). Social contagion of binge eating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolan, B., & Gitzinger, I. (1995). Why women? Gender issues and eating disorders. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K. (1999). Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex Roles, 40, 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206.Google Scholar
  11. Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garner, D. M. (1991). Eating Disorder Inventory-2 manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  13. Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1979). The Eating Attitudes Test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9, 273–279.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, M. S, & Fischer, A. F. (2004). Examining objectification theory: Sexual objectification’s link with self-objectification and moderation by sexual orientation and age in White women. Manuscript in preparation, University of Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
  15. Hirschmann, J. R., & Munter, C. H. (1995). When women stop hating their bodies. New York: Fawcett Columbine.Google Scholar
  16. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Hyde, J. S. (1991). Half the human experience (4th ed.). Lexington, MA: D.C. HeathGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaschak, E. (1992). Engendered lives: A new psychology of women’s experiences. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  19. Kashubeck-West, S., & Mintz, L. B. (2001). Eating disorders in women: Etiology, assessment, and treatment. Counseling Psychologist, 29, 627–634.Google Scholar
  20. Katkin, E. S. (1985). Blood, sweat, and tears: Individual differences in autonomic self-perception. Psychophysiology, 22, 125–137.Google Scholar
  21. Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Kilbourne, J. (1994). Still killing us softly: Advertising and the obsession with thinness. In P. Falon, M. Katzman, & S. C. Wooley (Eds.), Feminist perspectives on eating disorders (pp. 395–418). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Laquatra, T. A., & Clopton, J. R. (1994). Characteristics of alexithymia and eating disorders in college women. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landrine, H., Klonoff, E. A., Gibbs, J., Manning, V., & Lund, M. (1995). Physical and psychiatric correlates of gender discrimination: An application of the Schedule of Sexist Events. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 473–492.Google Scholar
  25. Lerner, H. G. (1993). The dance of deception: Pretending and truth-telling in women’s lives. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  26. Leung, F., Geller, J., & Katzman, M. (1996). Issues and concerns associated with different risk models for eating disorders. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 19, 249–256.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, M. (1992). Shame: The exposed self. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  28. Maine, M. (2000). Body wars: Making peace with women’s bodies. Carlsbad, CA: Gürze Books.Google Scholar
  29. Mazzeo, S. E. (1999). Modification of an existing measure of body image preoccupation and its relationship to disordered eating in female college students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McKinley, N. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1996). The Objectified Body Consciousness Scale: Development and validation. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 181–215.Google Scholar
  31. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Perceived sexist events and feminist identity development attitudes: Links to women’s psychological distress. Counseling Psychologist, 30, 44–65.Google Scholar
  32. Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2003). A concomitant examination of the relations of perceived racist and sexist events to psychological distress for African American women. Counseling Psychologist, 31, 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morry, M. M., & Staska, S. L. (2001). Magazine exposure: Internalization, self-objectification, eating attitudes, and body satisfaction in male and female university students. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 33, 269–279.Google Scholar
  34. Muehlenkamp, J. J., & Saris-Baglama, R. N. (2002). Self-objectification and its psychological outcomes for college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 371–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  36. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Girgus, J. (1994). The emergence of gender differences in depression during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 424–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Noll, S. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). A mediational model linking self-objectification, body shame, and disordered eating. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 623–636.Google Scholar
  38. Parsons, E. M., & Betz, N. E. (2001). The relationship of participation in sports and physical activity to body objectification, instrumentality, and locus of control among young women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pike, K. M. (1995). Bulimic symptomatology in high school girls: Toward a model of cumulative risk. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 373–396.Google Scholar
  40. Pipher, M. (1994). Reviving Ophelia: Saving the selves of adolescent girls. Carlsbad, CA: Gurze Books.Google Scholar
  41. Slater, A., & Tiggemann, M. (2002). A test of objectification theory in adolescent girls. Sex Roles, 46, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stice, E., Nemeroff, C., & Shaw, H. (1996). A test of the dual pathway model of bulimia nervosa: Evidence for restrained-eating and affect regulation mechanisms. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 340–363.Google Scholar
  43. Stice, E., Ziemba, C., Margolis, J., & Flick, P. (1996). The dual-pathway model differentiates bulimics, subclinical bulimics, and controls: Testing the continuity hypothesis. Behavior Therapy, 27, 531–549.Google Scholar
  44. Striegel-Moore, R. H., & Cachelin, F. M. (2001). Etiology of eating disorders in women. Counseling Psychologist, 29, 635–661.Google Scholar
  45. Striegel-Moore, R. H., Silberstein, L. R., & Rodin, J. (1986). Toward an understanding of risk factors for bulimia. American Psychologist, 41, 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, J. K., & Heinberg, L. J. (1999). The media’s influence on body image disturbance and eating disorders: We’ve reviled them, now can we rehabilitate them? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tiggemann, M., & Slater, A. (2001). A test of objectification theory in former dancers and non-dancers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tribole, E., & Resch, E. (1995). Intuitive eating. New York: St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
  50. Tylka, T. L. (2001). Building and examining a multidimensional model of eating disorder continuum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Akron, Ohio.Google Scholar
  51. Tylka, T. L., & Subich, L. M. (1999). Exploring the construct validity of the eating disorder continuum. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 46, 268–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wear, R. W., & Pratz, O. (1987). Test–retest reliability for the Eating Disorder Inventory. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 6, 767–769.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Ohio State UniversityMarion
  2. 2.State University of New York at New PaltzNew Paltz

Personalised recommendations