Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Are Doors Being Opened for the “Ladies’’ of College Sports? A Covariance Analysis

  • 358 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine sports symbols of colleges and universities for evidence of sexism and to identify factors that differentiated schools with andwithout sexist nicknames for their athletic teams. Data on team names and eight measures of women’s athleticism were collected from 112 colleges and universities for the 2000–2001 academic year. MANCOVA results revealed that women’s athleticism was stronger at schools with nonsexist nicknames for seven of the eight measures, although only one statistically significant difference was observed. Schools with nonsexist nicknames had a significantly higher percentage of assistant coaches who were women. Discussion focuses on why there may be more athletic opportunities and athletic resources for women at schools with nonsexist nicknames.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acosta, R. V., & Carpenter, L. J. (1990). Women in intercollegiate sport: 1977–1990. New York: Brooklyn College.

  2. Agthe, D. E., & Billings, R. B. (2000). The role of football profits in meeting Title IX gender equity regulations and policy. Journal of Sport Management, 14, 28–40.

  3. Archer, M., & Cohen, R. (1997). Leaving women out in left field: Sports metaphors, women, and legal discourse. Women and Language, 20, 2–6.

  4. Billings, A. C., Halone, K. K., & Denham, B. E. (2002). Man that was a pretty shot: An analysis of gendered broadcast commentary surrounding the 2000 men’s and women’s NCAA final four basketball championships. Mass Communication and Society, 5, 295–315.

  5. Coakley, J. (2001). Sport and society: Issues and controversies (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

  6. Cohen, J. (1995, August 15). The first Indian. Sports Illustrated, p. 84.

  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  8. Curry, T. J. (1991). Fraternal bonding in the locker room. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 119–135.

  9. Curry, T. J. (1998). Beyond the locker room: Campus bars and college athletes. Sociology of Sport Journal, 3, 205–215.

  10. Dolle, R. (1991). Sexist sticks and stones. Journal of Environmental Health, 53, 32.

  11. Duncan, M. C. (1993). Representation and the gun that points backwards. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 42–46.

  12. Durkheim, E. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1912)

  13. Eitzen, D. S. (2003). Fair and foul: Beyond the myths and paradoxes of sport (2nd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

  14. Eitzen, D. S., and Zinn, M. B. (1989). The de-athleticization of women: The naming and gender marking of collegiate sport teams. Sociology of Sport Journal, 6, 362–370.

  15. Eitzen, D. S., and Zinn, M. B. (1993). The sexist naming of collegiate athletic teams and resistance to change. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 17, 34–41.

  16. Fish, M., and Milliron, D. A. (1999, December 14). Football trumps all: From coaches compensation to sports budgets, football programs get the lion’s share of everything in high schools across Georgia. Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. E1.

  17. Fuller, J. R., & Manning, E. A. (1987). Violence and sexism in college mascots and symbols: A typology. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 15, 61–64.

  18. Greene, K., & Rubin, D. L. (1991). Effects of gender inclusive/exclusive language in religious discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 10, 81–98.

  19. Hasbrook, C. A. (1988). Female coaches—why the declining numbers and percentages? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 59, 59–63.

  20. Henley, N. M. (1987). This new species that seeks a new language: On sexism in language and language change. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in transition (pp. 3–27). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  21. Higgs, C. T., & Weiller, K. H. (1994). Gender bias and the 1992 summer Olympic games: An analysis of television coverage. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 18, 234–246.

  22. Johnson, M. E., & Dowling-Guyer, S. (1996). Effects of inclusive vs. exclusive language on evaluations of the counselor. Sex Roles, 34, 407–419.

  23. Klein, M.-L. (1988). Women in the discourse of sports reports. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 23, 139–152.

  24. Kleinman, S. (2002). Why sexist language matters. Qualitative Sociology, 25, 299–304.

  25. Knoppers, A. (1989). Coaching : An equal opportunity occupation? Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 60, 36–43.

  26. Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper & Row.

  27. Lerner, H. L. (1988). Women in therapy. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

  28. Marx, K., & Engles, F. (1963). The communist manifesto (E. Paul & C. Paul, Trans.). New York: Russell & Russell. (Original work published 1848)

  29. Massey, J. (1975). You’ve come a long way, baby—so tell it like it is! A report on sex bias in textbooks. Educational Horizons, 54, 94–98.

  30. McClendon, M. J. (1994). Multiple regression and causal analysis. Itasca, IL: Peacock.

  31. McConnell, A. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1996). Women as men and people: Effects of gender-marked language. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 1004–1013.

  32. McMinn, M. R., Lindsay, S. F., Hannum, L. E., & Troyer, P. K. (1990). Does sexist language reflect personal characteristics? Sex Roles, 23, 389–396.

  33. Merritt, R. D., & Kok, C. J. (1995). Attribution of gender to a gender-unspecified individual: An evaluation of the people = male hypothesis. Sex Roles, 33, 145–157.

  34. Messner, M. A., Duncan, M. C., & Jensen, K. (1993). Separating the men from the girls: The gendered language of televised sports. Gender and Society, 7, 121–137.

  35. Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1977). Words and women: New language in new times. Garden City, NY: Doubleday/Anchor.

  36. Miller, C., & Swift, K. (1980). The handbook of nonsexist writing. New York: Lippincott & Crowell.

  37. Miller, P., & Miller, R. (1995). The invisible woman: Female sports journalists in the workplace. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 72, 883–889.

  38. Nuessel, F. (1994). Objectionable sport team designations. Names, 42, 101–119.

  39. Pacey, P. L. (1982). Equal opportunity for women in intercollegiate sports: Financial aid and family background as major influences on female participation in competitive programs. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 41, 257–268.

  40. Sagas, M., Cunningham, G. B., Wigley, B. J., & Ashley, F. B. (2000). Internet coverage of university softball and baseball websites: The inequity continues. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 198–205.

  41. Speer, S. A. (2002). Sexist talk: Gender categories, participants’ orientations, and irony. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 347–377.

  42. Spender, D. (1980). Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

  43. Stahura, K., & Greenwood, M. (2001). Occupational employment patterns within women’s intercollegiate athletics: Revisiting homologous reproduction. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, A-110.

  44. Stangl, J., & Kane, M. J. (1991). Structural variables that offer explanatory power for the underrepresentation of women coaches since Title IX: The case of homologous reproduction. Sociology of Sport Journal, 8, 47–60.

  45. Staurowsky, E. J. (2000). An act of honor or exploitation? The Cleveland Indians’ use of the Louis Francis Sockalexis story. Sociology of Sport Journal, 17, 307–330.

  46. Stevens, J. (1992). Applied multivariate analysis for the social sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  47. Thornburg, E. G. (1995). Metaphors matter: How images of battle, sports, and sex shape the adversary system. Wisconsin Women’s Law Review, 10, 225–281.

  48. Van Den Bergh, N. (1987). Renaming: Vehicle for empowerment. In J. Penfield (Ed.), Women and language in transition (pp. 130–136). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

  49. Videon, T. M. (2002). Who plays and who benefits: Gender, interscholastic athletics, and academic outcomes. Sociological Perspectives, 45, 415–444.

  50. Whorf, B. L. (1956). The name of the situation as affecting behavior. In B. L. Whorf (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality (pp. 135–137). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  51. Wilkinson, M. (1976). Romantic love: The great equalizer? Sexism in popular music. Family Coordinator, 25, 161–166.

  52. Wong, G. M. (1994). Essentials of amateur sports (2nd ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.

  53. Yasser, R., McCurrdy, J., & Goplerud, C. (1997). Sports law: Cases and materials (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Russell E. Ward Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ward, R.E. Are Doors Being Opened for the “Ladies’’ of College Sports? A Covariance Analysis. Sex Roles 51, 697–708 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0719-9

Download citation

  • sports symbols
  • team nicknames
  • college sports
  • sexism