Advertisement

Gay Visibility and the Law in Hong Kong

  • Marco WanEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

This article draws on the ‘visual turn’ in legal studies to argue for the centrality of visibility in the analysis of the regulation of gay and lesbian identities, with a specific focus on Hong Kong. Part I gives an overview of the ways in which gay visibility operates within the cityscape of Hong Kong. Parts II and III then focus on the case of Cho Man Kit v. Broadcasting Authority to examine the ways in which questions of visibility emerge in the courtroom.

Keywords

Law and film Law and visual culture Gay rights Freedom of expression Documentary Cho Man Kit Hong Kong 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Cora Chan, Andrew Counter, and Ernest Lim for their comments on a draft of this article.

References

  1. 1.
    Adler, L. 2009. The Gay Agenda. Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 16: 147–217.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beachy, R. 2015. Gay Berlin: Birthplace of a modern identity. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bersani, L. 1987. Is the Rectum a Grave? 43(1987): 197–222.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks, P. 2016. Scott v. Harris: The Supreme Court’s reality effect. Law & Literature 29(1): 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook, M. 2008. London and the culture of homosexuality, 1885–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chauncey, G. 1994. Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the Gay Male World, 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danay, R. 2005. Leung v. Secretary for Justice: Privacy, equality and the hypersexualised homosexual stereotype. Hong Kong Law Journal 35: 545–568.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Feigenson, N. 2013. Visual common sense. In Law, culture and visual studies. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gamson, J. 1998. Tabloid talk shows and sexual nonconformity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodrich, P. 2017. Pictures as precedents: The visual turn and the status of figures in judgments. In New directions in law and literature, ed. Elizabeth S. Anker and Bernadette Meyler. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grierson, John. 1933. The documentary producer. In The documentary film reader: History, theory, criticism, ed. J. Kahana. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hennessy, R. 1994. Queer visibility in commodity culture. Cultural Critique 29: 31–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nichols, B. 1991. Representing reality: Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nussbaum, M. 2010. From disgust to humanity: Sexual orientation and constitutional law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sherwin, R. 2000. When law goes pop: The vanishing line between law and popular culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silbey, J. 2004. Judges as film critics: New approaches to filmic evidence. Michigan Journal of Law Reform 39: 493–572.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walters, S. 2001. All the rage: The story of gay visibility in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoshino, K. 2006. Covering: The hidden assault on our civil rights. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Cases

  1. 19.
    Cho Man Kit v. Broadcasting Authority [2008] HKEC 783.Google Scholar
  2. 20.
    Leung Chun Kwong v. Secretary for the Civil Service and Another [2018] HKCA 318.Google Scholar
  3. 21.
    QT v. Director of Immigration [2018] HKCFA 29.Google Scholar
  4. 22.
    Secretary of Justice v. Yau Yuk Lung Zigo [2007] HKCFA 50.Google Scholar
  5. 23.
    T v. Commissioner of Police [2014] HKCFA 71.Google Scholar

Journalistic Sources

  1. 24.
    Amnesty International. 4th February 2016. Anti-discrimination Legislation is Crucial to Ensure the Rights of LGBTI People in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Free Press. Google Scholar
  2. 25.
  3. 26.
    Editorial. 30th June, 2006. An Uphill Battle for Gay Rights. South China Morning Post.Google Scholar
  4. 27.
    Gold, M. 14th November 2017. Being Gay in Hong Kong Means Straddling Two Worlds. 1843 Magazine.Google Scholar
  5. 28.
    Grundy, T. 25th September 2016. Love is Love: Over 10,000 Attend Hong Kong’s Pink Dot LGBT Diversity and Equality Carnival’. Hong Kong Free Press.Google Scholar
  6. 29.
    Lau, C. 4th July 2018. ‘Giant step Forward for Equality’ In Hong Kong as Same-sex Couples Win Right to Spousal Visas in Court of Final Appeal. South China Morning Post.Google Scholar
  7. 30.
    Vines, S. 13th July 2018. Why is the Government So Determined to Maintain LGBT Discrimination?. ejinsight.com.Google Scholar
  8. 31.
    Wu, V and Yiu, P. 31st October 2017. ‘Hong Kong to Host 2022 Gay Games as LGBT Acceptance Grows in Parts of Asia’. Reuters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations