Advertisement

Desperately Seeking ‘Justice’ in Classical Chinese: On the Meanings of Yi

  • Deborah CaoEmail author
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

This essay sets out to search for an equivalent Chinese word to the English word ‘justice’ in classical Chinese language, through ancient Chinese philosophical texts, imperial codes and idioms. The study found that there does not seem to be a linguistic sign for ‘justice’ in classical Chinese, and further, yi resembles ‘justice’ in some ways and has been used sometimes to translate  ‘justice’, but yi is a complex concept in traditional Chinese philosophy with multiple meanings and it is dissimilar to ‘justice’ in their semantic and pragmatic meanings in Chinese and English legal culture. While ‘justice’ is a keyword and fundamental to Western law, yi is not a legal word or concept in classical Chinese in traditional China. Given its complexity, yi does not have a one-to-one equivalent in English. It sometimes carries a sense of ‘righteousness’ and occasionally ‘justice’, but yi and ‘justice’ are not equivalent. In view of these, it becomes understandable that the translations of yi in contemporary Chinese usage vary ranging from ‘friendship and justice’ to ‘greater good’, among others. The meaning of yi is still uncertain and context sensitive as it was two thousand years ago.

Keywords

Chinese law Legal language Classical Chinese Justice Legal meaning 

References

  1. 1.
    Staunton, S.G.T. 1810/1966. Ta Tsing Leu Lee, trans. Taipei: Ch’eng-Wen Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    André, J.S. 2004. But do they have a notion of justice? The Translator 10 (1): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cao, D. 2018. Chinese language in law: Code red. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jones, W.C. 1994. The great Qing code, trans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, G. 2016. Castration and connection: Kinship organization among Ming Eunuchs. Ming Studies 74: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lu, T. 2002. Persons, roles and minds: Identity in Peony Pavilion and Peach Blossom Fan. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnston, I. 2010. The Mozi: a complete translation. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang, W. 2016. In search of the way. Edinburgh University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Legge, J. 1970. The Chinese classics: With a translation, critical and exegetical notes, prolegomena, and copious indexes. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall, D.L., and R.T. Ames. 1987. Thinking through confucius. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng, C.-Y. 1997. Can we do justice to all theories of justice? In Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives,ed. Ron Bontekoe and Marietta Stepaniants, Honolulu, University of Hawai’i Press, 181-198. In Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, R. Bontekoe and M. Stepaniants, Editors. 1997, University of Hawai’i Press: Honolulu. p. 181–198.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van Norden, B. 2017. Mencius. In The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Peerenboom, R.P. 1990. Confucian justice: Achieving a humane society. International Philosophical Quarterly 117 (1): 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xiao, Y. 1997. Trying to do justice to the concept of justice in confucian ethics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy 24: 521–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Turner, K. 1992. Rule of law ideals in early China? Journal of Chinese Law 6 (2): 1–44.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alford, W.P. 1984. Of arsenic and old laws: Looking anew at criminal justice in late imperial China. California Law Review 72 (6): 1180–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wan, M.B. 2015. Court case Ballads: Popular ideals of justice in late Qing and Republican China. In Chinese law: Knowledge practice and transformation, 1530 s to 1950s, ed. L. Chen and M. Zelin, 287–320. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Humanities, Languages and Social ScienceGriffith UniversityNathan, BrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations