Advertisement

Hefa Quanyi: More than a Problem of Translation. Linguistic Evidence of Lawfully Limited Rights in China

  • Michele MannoniEmail author
Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

This essay addresses the legal meanings of the phrase hefa quanyi (lawful or legitimate rights and interests), an important Chinese legal phrase that is frequently found in many Chinese laws and legal documents, and whose interpretation is claimed by various scholars to affect the alienability of people’s rights. It first challenges the existing translations of the phrase into Italian and English. It secondly delves into its history and etymology, studying the legal meanings that the phrase has had in the various texts of the Constitution of China. It is suggested that hefa quanyi is not the semantic and legal equivalent of Western ‘rights and interests’, but rather that the phrase retains its etymological meaning of ‘power and negatively-connoted profit’. It is further argued that the adjective hefa (lawful) in the phrase is used to impose constraints on the rights and interests that the Chinese people are entitled to.

Keywords

Rights and interests Rights in China Limitations to rights Legal semiotics Legal translation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of a 3-year research project on Chinese legal language that I carried out at the University of Perugia, Italy, under the co-supervision of Professor Deborah Cao (Griffith University, Australia), to whom I am deeply grateful for her generous guidance and advice. An earlier version of the paper was presented at a roundtable at the Institute of History and Philology of the Academia Sinica of Taipei in February 2018 during my stay as a visiting scholar. I would like to thank the participants for their feedback and suggestions. The fund Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Perugia (2015–2018), which enabled me to carry out the project in Chinese legal language is also gratefully acknowledged. A special word of thank goes to Professor Ester Bianchi (University of Perugia) for her treasurable support and confidence.

References

  1. 1.
    Fang Liufang 方流芳. 2017. Fanyi he Wailai Falü Shuyu 翻译和外来法律术语 [“Translation and foreign legal terminology”]. WeChat (messaging app). Falü Yuyan Xue 法律语言学 [“Legal Linguistics”] subscription account.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Number of monthly active WeChat users from 2nd quarter 2010 to 2nd quarter 2017 (in millions). 2017. The Statistics Portalhttps://www.statista.com/statistics/255778/number-of-active-wechat-messenger-accounts/. Accessed 30 Dec 2017.
  3. 3.
    Zhongguo Caipan Wenshu Wang 中国裁判文书网 [‘China judgements database’]. http://wenshu.court.gov.cn/. Corpus. Accessed Aug 2016–March 2017.
  4. 4.
    Jiangsu sheng Baohu he Cujin Huaqiao Touzi Tiaoli 江苏省保护和促进华侨投资条例 (Regulation of Jiangsu Province on Protecting and Promoting Investment by Overseas Chinese). 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beida Fabao 北大法宝 (Lawinfochina). http://www.pkulaw.cn/. Legal database.
  6. 6.
    Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xianfa (2004) 中华人民共和国宪法 (2004) (2004 Constitution of the People’s Republic of China).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Keith, Ronald C. 1995. The New Relevance of “Rights and Interests”: China’s Changing Human Rights Theories. China Information X: 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Svensson, Marina. 2002. Debating Human Rights in China: A Conceptual and Political History. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benney, Jonathan. 2013. Defending Rights in Contemporary China. Oxon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Formichella, Laura, and Enrico Toti. 2013. Leggi tradotte della Repubblica Popolare Cinese: Legge sui contratti [Translation of the laws of the People’s Republic of China: The Contract Law]. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Naftali, Orna. 2014. Children, Rights and Modernity in China: Raising Self-Governing Citizens. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yuwen, Li. 2016. The Judicial System and Reform in Post-Mao China: Stumbling Towards Justice. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cao, Deborah, and Michele Mannoni. 2017. Are There ‘Illegal Rights’ in Chinese Law? On the Meanings of Feifa Quanyi. The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 5 (1): 190–204.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cjcl/cxx010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mannoni, Michele, and Deborah Cao. tba. On the meaning of feifa quanyi in Chinese legal language: A semiotic and corpus analysis. Linguistics and the Human Sciences(forthcoming: tba).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li, Charles N., and Sandra A. Thompson. 1989. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Popovič, Anton. 1975. La scienza della traduzione: aspetti metodologici, la comunicazione traduttiva [The science of translation: methods and translation communication; original title: Problemy hudozestvennogo perevoda (Teória umleckého prekladu)]. Milano: Hoepli.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Agar, Michael. 1994. Language Shock: Understanding The Culture Of Conversation. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun Dawei 孙大为 et al., ed. 2013. Xinbian Changyong Falü Cidian 新编常用法律词典 (Legal Dictionary-New Edition). Beijing 北京: Zhongguo Fazhi Chubanshe 中国法制出版社.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Han Dayuan 韩大元, and Qin Qiang 秦强. 2008. Xianfa Wenben zhong “Hefa” yici de Guifan Fenxi 宪法文本中“合法”一词的规范分析 (‘An analysis of the word ‘hefa’ in the Chinese Constitution’). Zhongzhou Xuekan 中州学刊 4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Breccia, Umberto, et al. 2011. Diritto privato [Private law]. Torino: UTET.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    British Law Report Corpus (BLaRC). http://flax.nzdl.org/greenstone3/flax?a=fp&sa=collAbout&c=BlaRC&if=. Corpus. Accessed 15 April 2017.
  22. 22.
    Rapalje, Stewart, and Robert L. Lawrence. 1997. A Dictionary of American and English Law: With Definitions of the Technical Terms of the Canon and Civil Laws : Also, Containing a Full Collection of Latin Maxims, and Citations of Upwards of Forty Thousand Reported Cases in which Words and Phrases Have Been Judicially Defined Or Construed. Union, NJ: The Lawbook Exchange Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pozzo, Barbara, and Valentina Jacometti (eds.). 2006. Multilingualism and the Harmonisation of European Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ferrari, Giuseppe Franco. 2008. Introduction to Italian Public Law. Milan: Giuffrè Editore.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cappelletti, Mauro, John Henry Merryman, and Joseph M. Perillo. 1967. The Italian Legal System: An Introduction. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Access to Justice in Italy. 2016. Access to justice in Europe: an overview of challenges and opportunities. http://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/1534-access-to-justice-2011-country-IT.pdf. Accessed 8 Oct 2016.
  27. 27.
    Pizzorusso, Alessandro. 1992. Italian Studies in Law: A Review of Legal Problems. Leiden, Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ledda, Franco. 1999. Agonia e Morte Ingloriosa dell’Interesse Legittimo [The agony and disgraced death of Italian illegitimate interest]. Foro Amministrativo: 2713-ff.p.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Cordero, Franco. 2006. Procedura penale [Criminal law]. Milan: Giuffrè Editore.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cao, Deborah. 2017. Chinese Language in Law-Code Red. Maryland: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    WTO Analytical Index. 2007. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Svarverud, Rune. 2001. The Notions of ‘Power’ and ‘Rights’. In New Terms for New Ideas: Western Knowledge and Lexical Change in Late Imperial China, ed. Michael Lackner, Iwo Amelung, and Joachim Kurtz, 125–143. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Defoort, Carine. 2008. The Profit That Does Not Profit: Paradoxes with Li in Early Chinese Texts. Asia Major (Academia Sinica) 21 (3): 153–181.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zhonghua Renmin Zhengzhi Xieshang Huiyi Gongtongg Gangling 中华人民政治协商会议共同纲领 (“Common Program of the Chinese People’s Consultative Conference”). 1949.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Xianfa (1982) 中华人民共和国宪法 (1982) (1982 Constitution of the People’s Republic of China).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Keith, Ronald C., and Zhiqiu Lin. 2001. Law and Justice in China’s New Marketplace. Hampshire, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang Qianfan 張千帆. 2016. Xianzheng Changshi 憲政常識 [The basis of constitutionalism]. Hong Kong: City University of HK Press.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hoijer, Harry. 1954. The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. Language in Culture, Proceedings of a Conference… reprinted in 1969 in Readings in Anthropology, Vol. 1, Morton H. Fried (ed.), 219–231. New York: Crowell: 92–105.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Berlin, Brent, and Paul Kay. 1991. Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Dedrick, Don. 1998. Naming the Rainbow: Colour Language, Colour Science, and Culture. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cao, Deborah. 2017. On the universality of “rights”: Absence and presence of “rights” in the Chinese language. Intercultural Pragmatics.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0012.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Literature and LanguagesUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations