Advertisement

Exploring the Myth of the Bobby and the Intrusion of the State into Social Space

  • Mark Brunger
Article
  • 204 Downloads

Abstract

This paper aims to increase the reader’s understanding of how the notion of the ‘bobby on the beat’ has been elevated to iconic, if not mythical, status within British policing. In doing so, the article utilises the semiotic idea of myth, as conceptualized by Roland Barthes, to explore how through representations of the ‘bobby on the beat’ police officers have been projected in a more avuncular re-assuring role to a public fearful of crime, which fails to do service to the signifying practices that accompany and embody the visible police patrol. Indeed, police patrol work secures social space for the State and although it does re-assure anxious members of society that their social world is safe and secure, for others, it further illustrates how their social space is fragile and troubled. On another level, the ‘bobby’ narrative has also been harnessed as part of a broader mythologizing of ‘Englishness’ and quintessential British characteristics.

Keywords

Policing Semiotics of social space Myth Roland Barthes 

References

  1. 1.
    Ascoli, D. 1979. The queen’s peace: The origins and development of the Metropolitan police, 1829–1979, Hamilton.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahn, C. 1974. The reassurance factor in police patrol. Criminology 12: 338–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barley, S. 1983. Semiotics and the study of organizational and occupational cultures. American Sociological Quarterly 28: 393–413.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barthes, R. 2009 [1972]. Mythologies. London: Vintage books.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baudrillard, J. 1994. Simulacra and simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bittner, E. 1973. The functions of the police in modern society: A review of background factors, current practices, and possible role models, University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casey, L. 2008. Engaging communities in fighting crime: A review by louise casey. Available: http://cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/cabinetoffice/corp/assets/publications/crime/cc_full_report.pdf.
  8. 8.
    Castells, M. 1996. The rise of the network society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. I. Cambridge, MA; Oxford, UK, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chaney, D. 1993. Fictions of collective life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clarke, R.V., and J.M. Hough. 1984. Crime and police effectiveness, Home office research study 79. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cohen, S. 1985. Visions of social control: Crime punishment and classification. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Critchley, T.A. 1967. A history of police in England and Wales 900–1966. London: Constable & Company.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Du Gay, P., Hall, S., Janes, L., Mackay, H., and K. Negus 1997. Doing cultural studies: The story of the Sony Walkman, Sage.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Durkheim, E. 1961. Moral education. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eco, U. 1976. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Archer.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gordon, P. 1984. White law. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greer, C., and E. McLaughlin. 2012. This is not justice: Ian tomlinson institutional failure and the press politics of outrage. British Journal of Criminology 52: 274–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hall, S. 1997. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. Sage: The Open University.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hancock, L. 2012. ‘Securitization, urban policy and the ‘community’. Collegium vol 11: 23–45.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hawkes, T. 1977. Structuralism and semiotics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Herbert, S. 1997. Policing space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles police department. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Office, Home. 2004. Building safer communities. London, HMSO: Beating Crime.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Office, Home. 2005. Neighbourhood policing: You’re police Your Community Our Commitment. Home Office, London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Office, Home. 2008. From the neighbourhood to the national: Policing our communities together. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Home Office. 2010. Policing in the 21st century-reconnecting police and the people. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jefferson, T. 1990. The case against paramilitary policing. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johnston, L., and C. Shearing. 2003. Governing security: Explorations in policing and justice. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lee, J.A. 1981. Some structural aspects of police deviance in relations with minority groups. In Organizational police deviance, ed. Shearing C, Toronto.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lentz, S.A., and R.H. Chaires. 2007. The invention of peel’s principles: A study of policing. Textbook history. Journal of Criminal Justice 35: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lewis, Paul, Newburn, T., Taylor, M., Mcgillivray, C., Greenhill, A., Frayman, H., and Proctor, R. 2011. Reading the riots: investigating England’s summer of disorder. Reading the riots, The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Guardian, London, UK. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/46297/1/Reading%20the%20riots%28published%29.pdf.
  32. 32.
    Lidichi, H. 1997. The Poetics and the Politics of Exhibiting other Cultures’. In Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, ed. S. Hall. Sage: The Open University.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Loader, 1997. Policing and the social: Questions of symbolic power. The British Journal of Sociology 48(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Loader, I., and A. Mulcahy. 2003. Policing and the condition of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Manning, P.K. 1977. Police work. Long Grove: Waveland.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Manning, P.K. 1987. Semiotics and fieldwork, Qualitative Research methods series, Sage University Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manning, P.K. 2012. Drama, the police and the sacred.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    McLaughlin, E., and K. Murji. 1997. The Future Lasts a long Time: Public Police work and the Managerialist Paradox. In Policing futures, ed. P. Francis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    McLaughlin, E. 2007. The new policing. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Millie, A. 2012. Police stations architecture and public reassurance. British Journal of Criminology 52: 1092–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    MORI (2005) Annual London Survey 2004: Final Topline 11th January 2005, London: London.gov.uk, http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor/annual_survey/docs/als05_topline.pdf.
  42. 42.
    Morgan, R., and T. Newburn. 1997. The future of policing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    National Reassurance Policing Programme (NRPP) (2005) The national reassurance policing programme, London: Home Office http://www.reassurancepolicing.co.uk.
  44. 44.
    Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Povey, K. 2001. Open all hours: A thematic inspection report on the role of police visibility and accessibility in public reassurance. London: HMIC.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Reiner, R. 1992. Policing a post-modern society. The Modern Law Review 55(6): 761–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Reiner, R. 1995. Myth and Modernity: Reality and Unreality in the English Model of Policing. In Comparisons in policing: An international perspective, ed. J.P. Brodeur. Avebury: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Reiner, R. 2000. The politics of the police, 3rd ed. Harvester Wheatsheaf: Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Savage, S. 2007. Neighbourhood policing and the reinvention of the constable. Policing 1(2): 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Scraton, P. 1985. The state of the police, Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Scraton, P. 1987. Editors introduction, law & order and the authoritarian state: Readings in critical criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Scraton, P., and K. Chadwick. 1996. The Theoretical and Political priorities of Critical criminology. In Criminological perspectives, ed. J. Muncie, E. McLaughlin, and M. Langan. CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Storch, R.D. 1975. The plague of blue locusts: Police reform and popular resistance in Northern England, 1840–1857, International Review of Social History, 20.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Taylor, D. 1997. The new police in 19th century england: Crime conflict and control, Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    The Daily Mail. 2011. Where are all our bobbies? One in four Britons has NEVER seen a police officer on the beat, 18 November 2011. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062963/Police-visibility-One-Britons-seen-police-officer-beat.html.
  56. 56.
    Wakefield, A. 2006. The value of foot patrol: A review of research, The police foundation/London. http://www.police-foundation.org.uk/uploads/catalogerfiles/the-value-of-foot-patrol/foot_patrol.pdf.
  57. 57.
    Woodward, K. 1997. Motherhood: Identities, Meanings and Myths. In Identity and difference, ed. K. Woodward. CA: Sage/The Open University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Law and Criminal Justice StudiesCanterbury Christ Church UniversityKentUK

Personalised recommendations