Intracultural Awareness in Legal Language—Silvio Berlusconi’s Iconography of Law

Article

Abstract

Against the assumption that legal and normative systems are coextensive with geopolitical units and national spaces, the article advocates for the need to study how different legal and normative semiospheres, within the same geopolitical unit and national space, often give rise to ‘normolects’ that are transversal to socio-economic classes, ethnicities, and cultural lifestyles. The concept of legal and normative ‘imaginaries’ is useful to come to terms with the legal and normative semiotic ideology of such normolects, including their non-verbal dimension and legal-normative semiotic ideologies. More generally, the article prompts legal scholars, and particularly semioticians of law, not to focus exclusively on inter-cultural awareness in legal-normative language but to concentrate also on intra-cultural awareness. As a case study, the article analyses a drawing through which the former Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi visualized and advertised for a bill of reform of the Italian judicial system by his Minister of Justice, Angelino Alfano. The semiotic analysis of this visual artifact casts new light on the controversial political and judicial figure of Mr Berlusconi. The drawing is read as a visual embodiment of the conflict between two different legal and normative ideologies within the present-day Italian political and judicial arena. The paradoxes that underpin this iconography of law and mar a rational confrontation of legal-normative arguments in contemporary Italy are uncovered.

Keywords

Legal and normative systems Legal and normative ideologies Normolects Legal and normative imaginaries Intercultural awareness Intracultural awareness Silvio Berlusconi Contemporary Italy Iconography of law Judicial reform 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank the two anonymous reviewers of the article for their excellent suggestions.

References

  1. 1.
    Cain, Maureen. 1974. The main themes of Marx’ and Engels’ sociology of law. British Journal of Law and Society 1(2): 136–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Consorti, Pierluigi. 2009. Nuovi razzismi e diritto interculturale. Dei principi generali e dei regolamenti condominiali nella società multiculturale. Stato, Chiese e pluralismo confessionale. http://www.statoechiese.it/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=293&Itemid=41. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  3. 3.
    Crow, Matthew S., and Marc Gertz. 2008. Sentencing policy and disparity: Guidelines and the influence of legal and democratic subcultures. Journal of Criminal Justice 36(4): 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Durie, ET. 2005. The rule of law, biculturalism and multiculturalism. Waikato law review: Taumauri, 13: 41–45. http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=650116721192887;res=IELHSS>. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  5. 5.
    Easton, Susan. 2008. Marx and Law. Farnham (Surrey): Ashgate.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eco, Umberto. 2003. Dire quasi la stessa cosa: Esperienze di traduzione. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glass, Arthur. 2001. Multiculturalism, law and the right to culture. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 24, 3. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/UNSWLJ/2001/71.html. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  8. 8.
    Heritier, Paolo. 2011. Tra il sacro e l’individuale: l’immaginario estetico–giuridico. In Immaginario (Imaginary), monographic issue of Lexia (new series), 7–8, ed. Massimo Leone, 419–436. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Imbriano, Umberto. 2010. Morale e diritto nel dialogo di civiltà. Fondamenti epistemologici dell’intesa per una giustizia interculturale. Phd Thesis in “Filosofia del diritto: arte e tecnica della giurisprudenza-ermeneutica dei diritti dell’uomo”, University of Naples “Federico II”, unpublished.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Landowski, Eric. 2011. De quoi l’imaginaire est–il le nom ? In Immaginario (Imaginary), monographic issue of Lexia (new series), 7-8, ed. Massimo Leone, 63-90. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leone, Massimo. 2009. The semiotic therapy of religious law. The International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 24(3): 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leone, Massimo. 2009. The paradox of shibboleth: Immunitas and communitas in language and religion. In Natura umana e linguaggio, monographic issue of RIFLRivista italiana di filosofia del linguaggio, 1, ed. Giusy Gallo. http://www.rifl.unical.it/news/base.php?subaction=showfull&id=1252453101. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  13. 13.
    Leone, Massimo. 2009. Sustainable religions in contemporary cities: A semiotic approach. International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic, and Social Sustainability 5(3): 47–59.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leone, Massimo. 2010. La sfera e il linguaggio—Topologie della cultura. In Forme e formalizzazione, ed. Elisabetta Gola, and Gian Pietro Storari, 67–74. Cagliari: CUEC.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leone, Massimo. 2010. Legal controversies about the establishment of new places of worship in multicultural cities: A semiogeographic analysis. In Prospects in legal semiotics, ed. Anne Wagner, and Jan Broekman, 217–237. Berlin and New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leone, Massimo, ed. 2010. Analisi delle cultureCulture dell’analisi (Analysis of culturesCultures of analysis), monographic issue of Lexia, 5–6. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leone, Massimo. 2010. On my accent: Signs of belonging in present-day multicultural societies. In Analisi delle cultureCulture dell’analisi (Analysis of cultures—Cultures of analysis), monographic issue of Lexia, 5–6, ed. Massimo Leone, 415–450. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leone, Massimo. 2010. Semiotic ideology and its metamorphoses. In Metamorphoses of the world: Traces, shadows, reflections, echoes, and metaphors, ed. Daina Teters, 133–146. Riga: Riga Technical University.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leone, Massimo. 2011. The reasonable audience of religious hatred: The semiotic ideology of anti-vilification laws in Australia. In Law and religion in public life: The contemporary debate, ed. Nadir Hosen, and Richard Mohr, 112–134. New York and Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leone, Massimo. 2011. Dall’ideologia linguistica all’ideologia semiotica: Sulla smentita. Esercizi filosofici 6(1): 318–328.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leone, Massimo, ed. 2011. Immaginario (Imaginary), monographic issue of Lexia (new series), 7–8. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Leone, Massimo. 2011. Semiotica dell’attraversamento. E/C. On-line Journal of the Italian Association for Semiotic Studies. www.ec-aiss.it Accessed on 5 Feb 2012.
  23. 23.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. Hearing and belonging: On sounds, faiths, and laws. In Perspectives in legal communication (law, language, and communication series), ed. Vijay K. Bhatia, Anne Wagner, Christoph Haffner, and Lindsay Miller, 183–198. Farnham (Surrey): Ashgate.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. Dalla semiotica della frontiera alla fenomenologia dell’attraversamento. In Lotman e la semiotica della cultura, eds Laura Gherlone, and Isabella Pezzini. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. Introduction to the semiotics of belonging. Semiotica (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. Sémiotique du sentiment d’appartenance. Nouveaux Actes Sémiotiques, 21 Feb 2012. http://revues.unilim.fr/nas/. Accessed 20 Jun 2012.
  27. 27.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. Quanta and qualia in the semiotic theory of culture. In Festschrift for Roland Posner, ed. Ernest W.B.Hess-Lüttich. Tubingen: Narr (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Leone, Massimo. 2012. The iconography of the Giving of the Law: A semiotic overview. In Law, culture, and visual studies, 4 vols, eds Anne Wagner, and Richard K. Sherwin. Berlin and New York: Springer (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lotman, Iuriĭ Mikhaĭlovich. 2001. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture, Engl. trans. Ann Shukman. London: Tauris.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lotman, Iuriĭ Mikhaĭlovich. 2009. Culture and explosion, ed. Marina Grishakova; transl. Wilma Clark. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maass, Anne, et al. 2000. Intimidating buildings: Can courthouse architecture affect perceived likelihood of conviction? Environment and behaviour 32(5): 674–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mammone, Andrea, and Giuseppe A. Veltri (eds.). 2010. Italy today: The sick man of Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Mohr, Richard and Contini, Francesco. 2010. Architectures of enunciation: Reassembling the legal. Paper delivered at the third justice environments conference, UWS, AIJA, Sydney, 20–22 May 2010. www.justiceenvironments.edu.au. Accessed on 5 Feb 2012.
  34. 34.
    Newell, James. 2010. The politics of Italy: Governance in a normal country. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Örücü, Esin. 2010. Diverse cultures and official laws: Multiculturalism and Euroscepticism? Utrecht Law Review, 6, 3. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1714430. Accessed 5 Feb 2012.
  36. 36.
    Payrow Shabani, Omid A., ed. 2007. Multiculturalism and law: A critical debate. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pinelli, Cesare. 2008. La ricerca della giusta distanza e la prospettiva del diritto interculturale. Daimon. Annuario di diritto comparato delle religioni 8: 65–95.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Resnik, Judith, and Dennis Curtis. 2011. Representing justice: Invention, controversy, and rights in city-states and democratic courtrooms. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ricca, Mario. 2008. Dike meticcia. Rotte di diritto interculturale. Rubbettino: Soveria Mannelli, CZ.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rosenbloom, Jonathan D. 1998. Social ideology as seen through courtroom and courthouse architecture. Columbia Journal of Law & the Arts 22: 463.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sampson, Robert J., and Bartusch Dawn Jeglum. 1998. Legal cynicism and (Subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & society review 32(4): 777–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Silbey, Susan S. 1992. Making a place for cultural analyses of law. Law and social inquiry 17(1): 39–48.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Spitzer, Steven. 1983. Marxist perspectives in the sociology of law. Annual review of sociology 9: 103–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Viroli, Maurizio. 2012. The liberty of servants: Berlusconi’s Italy, c2012. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wojciechowski, Bartosz. 2010. Philosophical approach to the interculturality of criminal law (Series: DIA-LOGOS. Schriften zu Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften - Volume 12). Frankfurt am Main et al.: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yee, Sienho, and Jacques-Yvan Morin. 2009. Multiculturalism and international law: Essays in honour of Edward McWhinney. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di FilosofiaUniversità di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations