Advertisement

Domestic Courts’ Reading of International Norms: A Semiotic Analysis

  • Veronika FikfakEmail author
  • Benedict BurnettEmail author
Article
  • 160 Downloads

Abstract

This article focuses on a number of cases in international law in which US domestic courts have produced judgments that conflict with those given by the International Court of Justice. The nature of these courts’ judgments has been extremely closely tied to the interpretation given by the US national Executive to a certain international norm. This situation raises a number of questions, which can be broadly categorized into two spheres: the legal (regarding the overall legality of the courts’ decisions) and the semiotic (regarding the manner in which a ‘meaning’ for the norm has been claimed by the courts). In this article we aim to provide answers to a number of these questions, both from the standpoint of international law and from that of a reader-response model of semiosis. We also analyse the level of interdependency that exists between the two spheres.

Keywords

International law Reader-response Interpretative community Judicial independence Domestic court 

References

  1. 1.
    Barak, Ahron. 2005. Purposive interpretation in law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barak, Ahron. 2006. A judge in a democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bickel, Alexander. 1986. The least dangerous branch: The supreme court at the bar of politics. Yale: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carter, Linda E. 2005. Lessons from Avena: The inadequacy of clemency and judicial proceedings for violations of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 15 (2): 259–280.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Collier, John, and Vaughan Lowe. 1999. The settlement of disputes in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Côté, Pierre-André. 1999. L’interpretation des lois, 3e. Montréal: Thémis.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Criddle, Evan. 2004. The Vienna Convention on the law of treaties in US treaty interpretation. Virginia Journal of International Law 44 (2): 431–500.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Drinan, Cara. 2002. Note. Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations: Private enforcement in American courts after LaGrand. Stanford Law Review 54 (6): 1303–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dworkin, Ronald. 1982. Law as interpretation. Texas Law Review 60: 527–560.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eagleton, Terry. 1996. Literary theory: An introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eco, Umberto. 1979. The role of the reader: Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fish, Stanley. 1980. Is there a text in this class? The authority of interpretive communities. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Franck, Thomas. 1992. Political questions/judicial answers: Does the rule of law apply to foreign affairs? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koskenniemi, Martti. 2005. From apology to utopia: The structure of international legal argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Reprinted 2007).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madison, James. [1788] 1987. The federalist paper no. 47. The particular structure of the new government and the distribution of power among its different parts. In The federalist papers, ed. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, 302–307. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Driscoll, Cara. 2000. Execution of foreign nationals in Arizona: Violations of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Arizona State Law Journal 32 (1): 323–344.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shabtai, Rosenne. 1993. An international law miscellany. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shelton, Dinah. 2004. ICJ jurisdiction—Vienna Convention on Consular Relations—diplomatic protection—reparations (International Court of Justice). American Journal International Law 98 (3): 559–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trainer, Kelly. 2000. The Vienna Convention on Consular Relations in the United States courts. Transnational Law 13 (1): 227–271.Google Scholar

List of Cases

  1. 20.
    Arrêt GISTI, Conseil d’Etat 29 June 1990, Recueil des arrêts du Conseil d’Etat 171.Google Scholar
  2. 21.
    (Avena) Mexico v. United States, Merits, ICJ Reports 2004.Google Scholar
  3. 22.
    Beaumartin v. France, judgment of 24 November 1994, Series A no. 296-B.Google Scholar
  4. 23.
    Breard v. Greene, 523 U.S. 371 (1998).Google Scholar
  5. 24.
    Chan v. Korean Airlines, 490 U.S. 122 (1986).Google Scholar
  6. 25.
    Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 26.
    Gordon v. State, 863 So. 2d 1215 (Fla. 2003).Google Scholar
  8. 27.
    Kolovrat v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 187 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 28.
    Federal Republic of Germany and LaGrand v. United States, 526 U.S. 111 (1999).Google Scholar
  10. 29.
    Federal Republic of Germany v. United States, Merits, ICJ Reports 2001.Google Scholar
  11. 30.
    Medellin v. Texas, 552 U.S. (2008).Google Scholar
  12. 31.
    Moyhernandez v. United States, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2005 WL 351115 S.D.N.Y., 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Paraguay v. United States, Order, ICJ Reports 1998, 248.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    Sumitomo Shoji America, Inc. v. Avagliano, 457 U.S. 176 (1982).Google Scholar
  15. 34.
    United States v. Ademaj, 170 F.3d 58 (1st Cir. 1999).Google Scholar
  16. 35.
    United States v. Banaban, 85 Fed. Appx. 395 (5th Cir. 2004).Google Scholar
  17. 36.
    United States v. De la Pava, 268 F.3d 157 (2nd Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
  18. 37.
    United States v. Emuegbunam, 268 F.3d 377 (6th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
  19. 38.
    United States v. Jimenez-Nava, 243 F.3d 192 (5th Cir. 2001).Google Scholar
  20. 39.
    United States v. Li, 206 F.3d 56 (1st Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
  21. 40.
    United States v. Lombera-Camorlinga, 206 F.3d 882 (9th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar
  22. 41.
    United States v. Page, 232 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 2000).Google Scholar

List of Conventions, Statutes and Constitutions

  1. 42.
    European Convention on Human Rights, 213 U.N.T.S. 222 (1950).Google Scholar
  2. 43.
    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 999 U.N.T.S. 171 (1967).Google Scholar
  3. 44.
    Statute of the International Court of Justice, 302 U.N.T.S. 251 (1958).Google Scholar
  4. 45.
    The Constitution of the United States of America.Google Scholar
  5. 46.
    Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, 596 U.N.T.S. 261 (1963).Google Scholar
  6. 47.
    Vienna Convention on Law of Treaties, 1155 U.N.T.S. 331 (1969).Google Scholar

Memoranda/Legislative History

  1. 48.
    Memorandum to the Attorney General. Application to Petition for Certiorari. 187a. (28 February 2005).Google Scholar
  2. 49.
    Restatement of the Law Third, Foreign Relations Law of the United States (Vols. 1–2) (1990).Google Scholar
  3. 50.
    Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, Executive Report 91-9: United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, Ninety-First Congress, first session. Committee hearing (5 October 1969).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lincoln CollegeUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations