Symbolism of the Spirit of the Laws: A Genealogical Excursus to Legal and Political Semiotics

Article

Abstract

The spirit of the laws is a symbol reflecting the ontological status and transcendental ideals of the system of positive law. The article analyses historical links between the romantic philosophy of the spirit of the nation (Volksgeist), which subsumed Montesquieu’s general spirit of the laws under the concept of ethnic culture, and recent politics of cultural and ethnic identity. Although criticising attempts at legalising ethnic collective identities, the article does not simply highlight the virtues of demos and the superiority of civic culture against the vices of ethnos and the regressive nature of ethnic politics of identity. Instead, the author argues that the civil democratic concept of political identity is part of the more general process of social differentiation: unlike the pre-political ethnic concept of identity, it can be converted to generalised democratic procedures and thus dismantle the totalitarian claims of cultural identity politics.

References

  1. 1.
    Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The civic culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aron, Raymond. 1965. Main currents in sociological thought 1: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx, Tocqueville, the sociologists and the revolution of 1848. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauman, Zygmunt. 1999. In search of politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bayart, Jean-Francois. 1996. L’illusion identitaire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cassirer, Ernst. 1953. The philosophy of symbolic forms, vol. 1. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Castells, Manuel. 2004. The information age: Economy, society and culture, vol. II (The Power of Identity). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cotterrell, Roger. 1992. The sociology of law: An introduction. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cotterrell, Roger. 1996. Some aspects of the communication of constitutional authority. In Law as Communication, ed. D. Nelken, 129–151. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dahrendorf, Ralf. 1998. A precarious balance: Economic opportunity, civil society, and political liberty. In The essential communitarian reader, ed. A. Etzioni, 73–96. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Descombes, Vincent. 1980. Modern French philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Durkheim, Émile. 1960. Montesquieu and Rousseau: Forerunners of sociology. Chicago: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Elshtain, Jean B. 1995. In common together: Unity, diversity, and civic virtue. In Toward a global civil society, ed. M. Walzer, 77–98. Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Finkielkraut, Alain. 1995. The defeat of the mind. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gellner, Ernest. 1987. Culture, identity, and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gellner, Ernest. 1998. Language and solitude: Wittgenstein, Malinowski and the Habsburg dilemma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. The European nation state. Ratio Juris 9: 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hampson, Norman. 1983. Will & circumstance: Montesquieu, Rousseau, and the French revolution. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hegel, Georg W.F. 1967. Hegel’s philosophy of right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hegel, Georg W.F. 1977. Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hegel, Georg W.F. 1977. Lectures on the philosophy of world history: Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hegel, Georg W.F. 1987. Lecture on the philosophy of religion, vol. II: Determinate religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hodge, Robert, and Gunther Kress. 1988. Social semiotics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hypollite, Jean. 1974. Genesis and structure of Hegel’s phenomenology of spirit. Evanson: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jackson, Bernard (ed.). 1994. Legal semiotics and the sociology of law. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kenny, Michael. 2004. The politics of identity: Liberal political theory and the dilemmas of difference. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1952. Race and history. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Loughlin, Martin. 1992. Public law and political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luhmann, Niklas. 1998. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft, Erster Teilband. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mährlein, Christopher. 2000. Volksgeist und Recht: Hegels Philosopphie der Einheit und ihre Bedeutung in der Rechtswissenschaft (Epistemata). Würzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Maine, Henry. 1883. Early law and custom. New York: Holt and Comp.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meinecke, Friedrich. 1972. Historism: The rise of a new historical outlook. London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Montesquieu, Charles. 1989. The spirit of the laws. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Plato. 1961. The collected dialogues of Plato. Eds. E. Hamilton and H. Cairns. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Přibáň, Jiří. 2007. Legal symbolism: On law, time and European identity. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ricoeur, Paul. 1961. La civilisation universelle et les cultures nationales, Esprit. October, Paris.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Santas, Gerasimos. 2002. Goodness and justice: Plato, Aristotle, and the moderns. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schnapper, Dominique. 1998. Community of citizens: On the modern idea of nationality. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Selznick, Philip. 1992. The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shklar, Judith. 1987. Montesquieu. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tam, Henry. 1998. Communitarianism: A new agenda for politics and citizenship. London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Taylor, Charles. 1985. Philosophical papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Taylor, Charles. 1989. Cross-purposes: The liberal communitarian debate. In Liberalism, the moral life, ed. N.L. Rosenblum, 159–182. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Taylor, Charles. 1992. Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Ed. A. Guttman. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Timasheff, Nicholas S. 1974. An introduction to the sociology of law. Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Touraine, Alain. 2000. Can we live together?. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    von Gierke, Otto. 1958. Natural law and the theory of society: 1500 to 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    von Herder, Johann G. 1969. Yet another philosophy of history concerning the development of mankind. In J.G. Herder on social and political culture, Trans. and ed. F.M. Barnard, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    von Herder, Johann G. 2002. How philosophy can become more universal and useful for the benefit of the people. In Philosophical writings, Trans. and ed. M.N. Forster, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    von Moser, Friedrich C. 1766. Von dem Deutschen national-Geist.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    von Savigny, Friedrich K. 1975. Of the vocation of our age for legislation and legal science. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wagner, Anne, Tracey Summerfield, and Farid S.B. Vanegas. 2005. Introduction: Law’s garden of forking paths. In Contemporary issues of the semiotics of law, ed. Anne Wagner, Tracey Summerfield, and Farid S.B. Vanegas, 1–16. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Waldron, Jeremy. 2000. Cultural identity and civic responsibility. In Citizenship in diverse societies, ed. W. Kymlicka, and W. Norman, 155–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Welsch, Wolfgang. 1996. Vernunft: Die zeitgenössische Vernunftkritik und das Konzept der transversalen Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Witteveen, Willem J. 1999. Significant, symbolic and symphonic laws. In Semiotics and legislation: Jurisprudential, institutional and sociological perspectives, ed. Schooten van Hanneke, 27–70. Liverpool: Deborah Charles Publications.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wundt, Wilhelm. 1916. Elements of folk psychology: Outlines of a psychological history of the development of mankind. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Žižek, Slavoj. 2001. Did somebody say totalitarianism? Five interventions in the (Mis)use of a notion. London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations