Face to Face



Peirce shows how he presupposes that a ‘most general science of semeiotic’ is entirely a matter of culture. Semiotics unfolds even beyond the debate on specific differences between nature and culture. The expression ‘semiotics of culture’ entails all components of a true pleonasm. Pierce finds his parallel in the philosophy of Hegel and both philosophers consider the close ties between expressiveness and consciousness as a specifically human, cultural and spiritual activity. That viewpoint leads not only to linguistic but also to other expressive phenomena, among which the body. Faces are perhaps the most outstanding bodily carriers of expression, so that Peirce’s analyses of Thirdness relate to the human face, not as a natural but as a cultural datum, in particular an artifice. A face-to-face relationship is embedded in a regulative discourse rather than an ethical appeal or other metaphysical dimensions. Three cases show various degrees of artificiality with different semiotic implications: Tilda Swinton’s appearance at the recent 2008 Oscar ceremony, the body art of Orlan and the first 2005 facial transplant of Isabelle Dinoire. The three do not only show how the human face is an artifice, but also how realities can appear to be fictitious within patterns of semiotic nature. Any sign can be a correlative to a fictitious world!


  1. 1.
    Agamben, G. 1991. Language and death. The place of negativity. Minneapolis: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akman, K. 2006. Orlan and the work of art in the age of hyper-mechanical organic reproduction. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies 3 (1): 1. Also at www.ubishops.ca/baudrillardstudies/Vol3_1/akman.htm.
  3. 3.
    Binswanger, L. 1942. Grundformen und Erkenntnis menschlichen Daseins. Zürich: M. Niehans Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Broekman, Jan M. 1996. Intertwinements of law and medicine. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broekman, Jan M. 2007. Trading signs. Semiotic practices in law and medicine. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 20 (3): 223–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broekman, Jan M., and H. Foox Michael. 2008. Binding words unfolding selves. New York: IIS Publishing Cie/iUniverse.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clark, A. 2003. Natural-born cyborgs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eco, U. 1979. A theory of semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Edelman, Gerald M., and G. Tononi. 2000. A universe of consciousness. How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Esser, J. 1969. Wesen und Wert der Rechtsfiktionen. Frankfurt/M: Klostermann.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hegel, G.W.F. 1967. Jenaer Realphilosophie, Vols. I & II. Hamburg: F Meiner.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kevelson, R. 1988. The law as a system of signs. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuczynski, A. 2008. Extreme makeover. New York Times Style Magazine Fashion & Beauty, April.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levinas, E. 1961. Totalite et Infini. Essai sur L’extériorité. Series Phaenomenologica, Vol. 8. Den Haag: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Levinas, E. 1963. Difficile Liberté. Paris: Michel.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levinas, E. 1972. Humanisme de l’Autre Homme. Montpellier: Fata Morgana.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Levi-Strauss, Cl. 1962. La Pensée Sauvage. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peirce, Ch. S. 1998. Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913), Edited by The Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    White, James B. 1973. The legal imagination. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dickinson School of LawPenn State UniversityCarlisleUSA

Personalised recommendations