The European Constitution: A Semiotics Analysis of Ideology, Identity and Global Commun in Present-Day Europe

Article

Abstract

This paper proposes an analysis of the European Constitution from the perspective of its conditions of possibility. The focus is on the conditions that subtend the European constitution, the conditions, the premises that make the European Constitution possible. In the present context of discourse “possibility” is understood in the sense of Kantian critique. But here critique is based on Reasonableness rather than on Reason—in fact a thesis orienting this essay is that the human being to survive and to survive well must quickly change from a rational animal into a reasonable animal. Is the European constitution possible? Where must we search for the necessary conditions that support the European constitution (1) in common historical and cultural traditions, in common practices, in common social behaviours or (2) merely in a shared decision, an accord, a contract, a convention? There exists a third possibility: the idea that Europe has no future without a European constitution founded on awareness that all European Nations participate in a common destiny, which in the era of globalization is the destiny the whole world, indeed of life over the whole planet. Such participation must be based on the logic of otherness and reasonableness of which the human being alone as a semiotic animal is capable. As a semiotic animal, that is, an animal capable of metasemiosis, reflection and critical consciousness, the human being is responsible for all of life over the planet.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin, W. 1986 [1931]. The destructive character. In Reflections. Walter Benjamin. Essays, aphorisms, autobiographical writings, ed. P. Demetz, 301–303 (8h ed., Eng. Trans: Jephcott, E.). New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calvino, I. 1988. Lezioni americane, 59. Milan: Garzanti.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Council of the European Union. 2003. Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications o the European Communities.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derrida, J. 2003. Voyous. Paris: Galilée.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    European Coordination Centre for Research, Documentation in Social Sciences. 1990. L’Acte final d’Helsinki. Wilhelmsfeld: Gottfried Egert Verlag.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    European Commission. 1995. Green Book on Innovation. typescrpt, see European Commission website.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Levinas, E. 1988. À l’Heure des Nations. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit. English edition: Levinas, E. 1994. In the time of the Nations (trans: Smith, M. B.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levinas, E. 1974. Autrement qu’être ou au-dela de l’essence. The Hague: Nijhoff; English edition: Levinas, E. 2000. Otherwise than being or beyond essence (trans: Lingis, A.). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levinas, E. 1993. The rights of man and the rights of the other. In Outside the subject, 116–125 (trans: Smith, M. B.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marx, K. 1959 [1844]. Private property and communism. In Economic and philosophic manuscripts (trans: Milligan, M.). Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marx, K. 1970 [1875]. Critique of the Gotha Programme. In Marx/Engels selected works vol. 3, 13–30. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marx, K. 1973 [1857–1861]. Outlines of the critique of political economy (trans: Nicolaus, M.). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morin, E. 1987. Penser l’Europe. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morris, C. 1948. The open self. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Security Council. 2002. The National Security Strategy of the United States of America. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rossi-Landi, F. 1982. Ideologia, ed. A. Ponzio. Rome: Meltemi.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rossi-Landi, F. 1994 [1972]. Semiotica e ideologia, ed. A. Ponzio. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schaff, A. 1992. Umanesimo ecumenico, ed. A. Ponzio (1t ed. in Spanish, 1991). Bari: Adriatica.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Schaff, A. 1998. Meditazioni, ed. A. Ponzio (Italian translation from Spanish edition 1997). Bari: Edizioni dal Sud.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sebeok, T. A. 1991. Semiosis and semiotics: What lies in their future? In A sign is just a sign, 97–99. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sebeok, T. A. 2001. Global semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Villain-Gandossi, C., K. Bochmann, M. Metzeltin, and C. Shäffner. 1990. The concept of Europe in the process of the CSCE. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Pratiche linguistiche e analisi di testiFacoltà di Lingue e Letterature Straniere, Università di BariBariItaly

Personalised recommendations